Review 3 of 13
Price Paid:
$200.00
from local store Summary: Ignore reviews where reviewers refer to magazine reviews. This forum is for people who have used the lenses themselves. Yes the Zeiss Planar 1.4 was top dog in the Pop Photography review a few years ago.
The Planar is superb. So is the Summicron. I had a 10 year old Canadian 50 f2 pre ROM. The results: incredible fine detail with very fine gradients between objects in the frame. I don't know the exact technical terminology. But if you enlarge the negs to huge prints, the fine detail will astound you. If you just look at prints, the beauty of the tonal range and the perfect balance of all optical qualities (as opposed to pumping one or the other for visual effect) will be evident to anyone.
This is a superior lens that delivers beyond the measurable numbers.
It's not a mystique...it's just good. Other lenses do similar special things--Olympus 50 1.8, the 35 on the Konica Hexar AF, the currednt Voigtlander Nokton 50 1.5, the Nikkor 50 f2 AI and others. There is no mystique with any of them. The makers just got it right.
I doubt whether those who criticized this lens have used it. That's too bad because careless criticism can stop others from enjoying something special.
Some reviewers beat up Leica products because they're Leica and some reviewers revere Leica because they're Leica. This lens is great because someone made it great. Try it. Strengths: Brilliant optically in ways that will continue to delight and must be lived with to appreciate. Superbly made. Weaknesses: I have seen some with stiff focus, but that may be a function of age as I have seen the same problem in other manufacturers lenses. Maybe the cameras are less good, but that is strictly speaking not a lens flaw. Similar Products Used: 50's from Nikon, Olympus, Voigtlander (modern) Pentax and Canon FD. Lot's of great 50's out there Customer Service: No personal experience.
|