Tokina AT-X 235 AF PRO 20-35mm f/2.8 Reviews

Rating
Reviewed by:

spring
( Expert)

Review Date
September 11, 2006

Overall Rating
4 of 5

Value Rating
5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Review 1 of 25

Price Paid: $400.00 from Hongkong

Summary:

This is a ATXpro lens and hence has very good finishing appropriate for a pro-level equipment. Weight and size has complemented both digi-bodies as well as film bodies very nicely. Feels more expensive than it is.

Strengths:

Fine sharpness and contrasty. Lens is very well built and markings on body is clear, finished with a touch of class on tenture.
Nothing is better for a f2.8 spec-ed lens at this price. Of course nikkor 17-35mm/f2.8 rules but how many times more do you need to fork out? Eitherway most owners of the nikkor also used it at f4. This Tokina does not lose at f4 either.

Weaknesses:

got to master the MF/AF switch.
lens hood can be better.

Customer Service:

Not needed.

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:

ScentlessApprentice
( Professional)

Review Date
April 28, 2006

Overall Rating
5 of 5

Value Rating
5 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Visitors rate this review
2.50 of 5,
2 votes

Review 2 of 25

Price Paid: $259.00 from Adorama

Summary:

It is an extreamly sharp lens (or at least mine is). It is not quite as sharp as my 20mm Nikkor prime but it is FAR sharper than than my 24-85mm 2.8-4 and my 24-120mm 3.5-5.6 VR on the 24mm end of things. Even at 2.8 the lens is more than acceptable and sharper than I expected.

Focus is very fast and accurate.

I've found the color to be brilliant. There may be a very slight color difference from this lens to some of my other 2.8 Nikkor lenses, due to the different coatings they use.... its no big deal in my opinion. I think I only see it in my purples and blues... could be my imagination... very small.

I have not used it for any arcitectural work. So, I can't really comment on pin cusion or barrel distortion. Its there.... but acceptable for large group photos and such things.

Flare is more of an issue with this lens than with my 20mm prime.... for one obvious reason.... 20mm Nikon is a 52mm prime and the 20-35mm Tokina is a 77mm zoom. This is a fact of life.

I have no regrets on buying this lens. Dollar-for-dollar its the best 2.8 wide zoom out there for your Nikon, if you can only afford used lenes.

Strengths:

Sharp.

Build quality is second to none! It doesn't feel like a toy.

The bokeh is beautiful.

Weaknesses:

It is extreamly heavy! No joke. Pick up your camera and try to hold a 32oz glass jar of manaise in the same hand and you'll have an idea how heavy it is. Its over one and a third pounds! Two wide Nikkor primes would be lighter.

Focus Clutch really isn't quite there yet. If your like me, and don't plan on using that feature then its not really a drawback.

Similar Products Used:

Nikon AF 20mm 2.8
Nikon AF 28mm 2.8
Nikon AF 24-85mm 2.8-4
Nikon AF 24-120mm VR 3.5-5.6

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:

jonaschen
( Intermediate)

Review Date
December 1, 2005

Overall Rating
4 of 5

Value Rating
4 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Review 3 of 25

Price Paid: $210.00 from yahoo

Summary:

I bought this len simply because I need a wide zoom len and hesitate to pay more than 1200 for Nikkor 17-35(though I think it worth this price.) The focus speed is fast on my F100. The image is blur at wide opened aperture. It becomes better at f3.3 and getting better from f4.0 to f11. You can see my simply test for this len on http://www.fotop.net/jonaschen/tokina2035. Overall, I think this is a good len for this price. The construction looks professional.

Strengths:

zoom, low price, fast focus, construction quality

Weaknesses:

blur at f2.8

Similar Products Used:

Nikkor 20mm f2.8, Nikkor 35mm f2.0, Nikkor 18-35 f3.5

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:

PhotoJeff
( Expert)

Review Date
May 30, 2005

Overall Rating
5 of 5

Value Rating
5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5,
4 votes

Review 4 of 25

Price Paid: $195.00 from eBay

Summary:

I purchased this lens used on eBay as a replacement for three prime lenses I was tired of lugging around. THIS WAS MY FIRST NON OEM BRAND LENS PURCHASE EVER! I had heard about Tokina's reputation for good glass, so for less than $200.00, I decided to give it a try. Needless to say, I am VERY IMPRESSED with the sharpness and contrast. I use it on my N-90s, F-100, and D-70. The images produced on my D-70 are stunning! The lens is heavy, but I like that. I am so tired of all this plastic crap on the market today. I tend you "use" my equipment which means is often gets shoved in my bag with other equipment, therefore, it has to be heavy. The autofocus is very fast on my F-100 and a almost as fast on my D-70. For apporximately $200.00 used compared with the new Nikkor at over $1,000.00? It was a no brainer. Plus, I have shot both lenses and if you are intellectually honest? You cannot see any difference in picture quality in prints up to 8 X 12. Trust me on this one. Don't let the photo snobs convince you otherwise.

Strengths:

SOLID BUILD QUALITY sharpness contrast weight

Weaknesses:

weight does not focus quite as close as the 20-35mm nikkor

Similar Products Used:

20 mm 2.8 nikkor 24 mm 2.8 nikkor (still the sharpest ever) 20-35 2.8 nikkor 28-85 nikkor (almost worn out after 12 years and several thousand rolls of film) 24-84 nikkor DX (nice sharp lens for cheap plastic)

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:

andyR
( Intermediate)

Review Date
March 30, 2004

Overall Rating
3 of 5

Value Rating
2 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.67 of 5,
9 votes

Review 5 of 25

Price Paid: $350.00 from (price in UKP)

Summary:

A well-built, good looking lens (if that's important to you) that optically just doesn't cut it when measured against the cheap, second-hand wide angle primes that are available in the Pentax mount. Think hard about whether you actually need a zoom at this range, or if a smaller, lighter, sharper and probably cheaper prime or two would do the job instead.

Strengths:

Well-built, looks good? Flare control and vignetting on a par with primes I have used, best performance at 20mm

Weaknesses:

Muddy contrast from wide-open to f8 throughout zoom range; unacceptably soft and low-res at 'long' end even on 4x6 machine prints

Similar Products Used:

Sigma 24mm f2.8 (mf version) Pentax 28mm f3.5 M

Customer Service:

not used

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.