Home | Login | Register
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Camera Cases:  Backpacks:
752  Super Photo Daypack

More Products from Tamrac
Link to this page

Tamrac 752 Super Photo Daypack


Featured Merchants


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

haledixon

( Intermediate)

Review Date
February 14, 2005

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 6

Price Paid:  $170.00 from http://www.acephotod

Summary:

after a lengthy battle with acephotodigital.com, i finally received my model 752. i wanted a nice, simple backpack that was capable of holding 2 SLRs with modest lenses attached. after about 20 minutes of trying to get a snug fit with the ill conceived 'lens gate' velcro padding pieces, i gutted the back and pieced together my own system using bits and pieces of vecro padding from a few of my other backpacks. the stock padding, compared to my lowepro, is cheap and thin. the configuration of the padding is also pretty stupid. you end up having to create shelves with the padding that effectively kills about 15% of the space in your bag. the illustrations on the tamrac site show lenses under the camera, but really, who's gonna put a lense in a place where everytime you gotta get to it you have to take out the velcro pieces. they're hard enough to get in place to begin with. finally, the bag just feels cheap. i bought it because a coworker has a tamrac bag made from a nice heavyweight material, but this one is made from ballistic nylon. it may be strong, but feels like junk. my jansport circa 1994 feels like a better bag. come to think of it, jansport should make camera bags. i'm probably gonna send this thing back and get something else.

Strengths:

- well-padded shoulder straps - tuck away waist strap - plenty of room

Weaknesses:

- thin, cheap feeling padding - "lens gate" padding elements just suck - thin, cheap feeling material - no D-rings for shoulder strap - freaking huge

Similar Products Used:

only other backpack used was a Lowepro Micro-trekker

Customer Service:

called in reference to a product mixup, they were extremely helpful and courteous.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: noshima
 (Professional)

Review Date
March 29, 2003

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 6

Price Paid:  $120.00 from Hong Kong

Summary:

I used this bag over three extended book projects in Asia, several years of shorter assignments and a trip through Bagan, Angkor Wat and Luang Prabang. All in all, it held up well. It took a lot of abuse: straps are frayed, its scuffed and it looks beat, but to its credit, all the clips and zippers still work and there are no holes in the cloth. Mostly carried a big Noblex 120 and a Mamiya 7 with three lenses, light meter and about 50 rolls of 120 film. Or a linhof 5x7 camera with about 10 holders. Either is pushing the limits of the bag.

Strengths:

Well made, durable for its weight. Doesn't look like a camera bag, more like a daypack. Pockets and space are functional and well separated.

Weaknesses:

Logged a lot of miles and have often wished the shoulder straps were wider and better padded.

Similar Products Used:

The other photo backpacks aren't quite the same.

Customer Service:

no experience



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Lee Gibson
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
May 21, 2002

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Visitors rate this review
4.67 of 5,
3 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 6

Price Paid:  $130.00 from local retail

Summary:

If you're tall, forget it. It's a good buy compared to the other bags but once loaded, it will bite you in the middle of the back. I like the bag otherwise, I just wouldn't wear it for more than fifteen minutes.

Strengths:

price, size, usability

Weaknesses:

uncomfortable, no back support as in regular photo backpacks

Similar Products Used:

shoulder bags and backpacking equipment

Customer Service:

no need



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Kathryn Ashe
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
May 23, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
2.50 of 5,
2 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 6

Price Paid:  $120.00 from B&H

Summary:

I'm short and this daypack doesn't overwhelm my back. Since I frequently am photographing grizzly bears in Alaska, I like being able to get into my bag without having to set it down on wet muddy ground. For anyone under 5'6" I strongly suggest looking at this product.

Strengths:

Roomy, but compact. Can handle more than one body + several lenses and lots of accessories

Weaknesses:

Would like the ability to carry a tripod easily attached to this bag.

Similar Products Used:

none

Customer Service:

not needed



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Bob Henning
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
October 2, 2000

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 6

Price Paid:  $130.00 from B&H Camera

Summary:

752 is great for outdoor or urban trips. Carries enough equipment for most experienced photographers. I own both the 750 & 752 Tamrac Daypacks (see 750 review). I use the 752 when I'm in need of multiple cameras (film and digital), plus lots of lenses.

Strengths:

Lot's of room for experienced photog. Can carry 2 cameras w/lens, 2-3 telephoto lens, 2-3 standard lens, flash, filters, etc. Doesn't look like a camera bag!

Weaknesses:

Only have a small issue with the cover/flap. Wish it didn't cover lower compartment (camera area) access zipper. Also wish upper compartment was padded.

Similar Products Used:

Went from shoulder type photo bags to daypack style.

Customer Service:

None needed.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2008 PMA Tradeshow
Camera News:
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda