Home | Login | Register   REVIEW SHOP SHARE LEARN
  PhotographyReview.com          
  Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community
RSS Feed
REVIEWS:  Film:  Print Film:
Gold Max ISO 800

Sample Images
More Products from Kodak
Link to this page

Kodak Gold Max ISO 800


 
Sort by Latest Reviews >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: basschris
 (Beginner)

Review Date
February 1, 2004

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 1 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 42

Price Paid:  $5.00 from Local Store

Summary:
Can we say...crap! Horrible grain, colors and everything else. I think I only was able to get one "clean" shot out of the two rolls that I used one time. Simply, I will not use any high ISO Kodak film again. Fuji is MUCH MUCH better.

Strengths:
Absolutely none, except for my one picture that turned out somewhat exceptional. And and I know it wasn't because of how I exposed the picture.

Weaknesses:
Everything, don't use it. I stopped buying Kodak film after this. Wish I would have used Fuji from the beginning.

Similar Products Used:
Fuji Press 1600, 160 NPS & NPC, Superia xtra 400, Super HQ 200 & 100, Kodak 160 VC, Kodak Zoom 800 (equally as bad).

Customer Service:
N/A



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: peter
 (Casual)

Review Date
December 28, 2003

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 1 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 42

Price Paid:  $9.00 from target

Summary:
I was curious about this film. It looked fast enough to take my baby pictures. I took two rolls of films at different day but when I got the pictures...they all looked blue!!!!!! And too grainy. So I came here to check what went wrong. Obviously, it was my fault nor the film developing machine. Worst experience with film ever. Can we advertise not to buy this film???

Strengths:
cheap price

Weaknesses:
other than price

Similar Products Used:
any recommendation for iso 800?



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: rtsphototech
 (Casual)

Review Date
October 9, 2003

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 1 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 42

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:
I shot one roll of this film and it was awful! Bad grain, flat color....all around bad. I also run a photo lab and it seems a majority of rolls of this film I've developed have had the same problems. As much as I'd like to find something nice to say about this stuff, I just can't!

Strengths:
Makes a great gift for the photographer you despise!

Weaknesses:
Inferior all the way around. Pricing is higher than regular Kodak Max

Similar Products Used:
Royal Gold 400 Portra VC Ilford XP-2



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Arjen
 (Professional)

Review Date
September 10, 2003

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 1 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5,
8 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 42

Price Paid:  $0.00 from Super Photo

Summary:
I thought I had made a huge mistake when making the photo's. It all looks underexposed, bad colours, weak blacks, terrible grain. After reading some reviews here I realise I made a mistake purchasing this film.

Strengths:
Well, maybe useful for some project where you need photo's that look absolutely crappy.

Weaknesses:
Looks crappy: colours, grain, unsharp, flare, and lots of it all.

Similar Products Used:
Fuji press 800 Fuji Superia 1600 Kodak Gold 400



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Thomas Bailey
 (Expert)

Review Date
May 30, 2003

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 42

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:
I find this film to be quite good, but not exceptional. For photographing vacations, trips, etc, this is a competant film. At ISO 800, it is sufficient for most conditions. If I want more speed, I will use 1600 or 3200-speed



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2008 PMA Tradeshow
Camera News:
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda