Review 3 of 4
Summary: I have not tried the market´s all similar films, and no Kodaks during later years...sorry you Americans...but since they come from so many different factories it´s hard for labs here to have machines calibrated to all different "emulsions" of the same film out at the same time on the market.So "single-factory" films like Konica have an advantage... Wel, this film is the first raelly good 400 I have tried, and I have shot 2 weddings with it, indoors with flash, outdoors with and without fil-in, and other outdoor shoots.All to my full satisfaction!I first just shot a roll randomly on differnet subjects, and from the start I was impressed of the grainless (visibly so on small prints, of course not so on larger prints) and very clear-coloured and sharp images it produced.All direct out of the 1-hour lab at my work.I´m sure it can perform even better on manually copied enlargements, but have not tried that yet. However, this film have won me over totally from using 200 ISO, maybe I will still use some Reala 100 (or Centuria 100, but I´ve heard it´s not so impressiv as Cent 400) when I need extra neutral colours, but mostly I want that little more punch that this film have been giving the last 10-12 rolls I have shot with it. Here in Sweden a good 400, with some richness colour-wise, have it´s use, that´s for sure!!! 4 stars overall since the perfect film has yet to come, value is on top though! Strengths: Great colours, pure and UN-muted Yet I haven´t even noticed any grain, which always plagued the 400´s I´ve tried before, including Konica. Weaknesses: None I can say no other film has. Similar Products Used: Fuji 200 & 400 Superia Fuji Reala (good one, but...a 100 ISO!) Konica Centuria 200
|