Pentax SMCP-FA 80mm-320mm f/4.5-5.6 35mm Zoom

Pentax SMCP-FA 80mm-320mm f/4.5-5.6 35mm Zoom 

DESCRIPTION

  • Aperture range: f/4.5-32
  • Min focus: 4.9 ft. (1.5m)

  • USER REVIEWS

    Showing 1-10 of 14  
    [Dec 07, 2009]
    Auditor
    Casual

    Strength:

    Zoom range
    Good Image Quality
    Price is hard to Beat
    Reasonable Size and Weight
    Superb for Travel
    Quick autofocus and decent maual focus

    Weakness:

    No lens hood
    Lens barrel turns while focusing
    Plastic filter mount.

    Every time I use this lens I continue to be surprised. True, it is not the sharpest tool in the shed, I do have sharper zooms. But they cost over 5 times as much as this one did and are almost 3 times heavier. This is a great travel zoom with excellent range. I have read a lot of reviews that indicate it to be soft over 250mm, but my copy returns images that are just as good at 320 as they are at 200mm. As with almost any telephoto (or any lens for that matter), a good, solid, tripod mount will improve the quality of your pictures. If you are expected professional level image quality while handholding this lens, especially at 320mm, you will be disappointed.

    This is an inexpensive, consumer grade zoom that provides really good pictures if you do your part. I am a casual hobbyist who just enjoys taking pictures and this zoom is a perfect match for me. It's not so heavy I dread taking it out and I'm not disappointed with the picture quality when I get back. I liked this lens on my film camera and still like it on my digital camera.

    A couple of reviewers have indicated that this zoom creeps (extends on its own while you are moving around). Mine is still pretty tight so I don't notice it as a big problem.

    One problem I have noted is that the lens barrel turn while focusing so this can cause some problems if you are used to using a circular polarizer. Additionally, the filter threads are plastic so you may want to mount a metal UV filter to the end of the lens to protect the threads from accidental damage.

    Customer Service

    I have had no problems with this lens so haven't needed any service.

    Similar Products Used:

    Pentax FA 28-200
    Pentax F 70-210
    Sigma APO 70-200
    Pentax DA 50-200

    OVERALL
    RATING
    4
    VALUE
    RATING
    5
    [Jun 11, 2007]
    thelit21
    Intermediate

    Strength:

    Unmatched color rendition and flare control (classic "Pentax aura")
    In a DSLR, the 320mm has extra "reach" that makes a difference in some shots
    Image quality, contrast and tonality very pleasant at 80-200mm from F8-11
    Usable indoor with a flash, high ISO and/or SR
    Unbeatable value if you buy second-hand


    Weakness:

    Rough bokeh
    Zoom creep
    Average build quality
    At 250-320mm, image is quite soft and lacks contrast in prints 8X10 or larger

    As many other users have pointed out, the Pentax FA 80320 has decent sharpness and unmatched color rendition at F8-11 from 80-200mm. Small aperture and limited low light performance is a given at this price point. However, I found it perfect for travel or outdoor snapshooting with its compact (fully retracted) and unobtrusive profile. I use it routinely with a 58mm Sony M3358 achromatic close-up lens for brilliant macro shots. IMHO the FA 80320 has better optics than FA 100300, FA 80200 and FA 70200. When used in a Pentax DSLR, the newer DA 50200 pulls ahead with a better CA and fringing control. Still, the 80320 represents the best value in the Pentax lineup if you need a low cost, fine quality tele-zoom. Since I seldom make prints larger than 8X10, this fine lens is all I need in this focal range.

    Similar Products Used:

    Pentax FA 100-300
    Pentax FA 80-200
    Pentax FA 70-200
    Sigma APO 70-300

    OVERALL
    RATING
    4
    VALUE
    RATING
    5
    [Jan 02, 2007]
    rechitansorin
    Expert

    Strength:

    Optical quality.

    Weakness:

    Built quality.

    This is the best lens in it s class i ever used. The optical performance amazed me from the first shots. Wide opened, it is a little soft and vulnerable to vignetting ( as any zoom...) but stopped down at f8, it s color rendition, contrast and definition of the image willl be very good. Avoid using it at 320mm, where the image quality decreases significantly. Fixed on a Slik Able 300ST tripod and a Pentax Z1 camera, at this focal length i obtained quite soft images even stopped down to f16. But i am sure that any zoom in this class will not perform better ( excepting, maybe, the legendary AF Nikkor 75-300mm f 4,5 -5,6, that i did not use). The Pentax coating seems to be at it s best, too...just minor flare problems. Some people may be disappointed by the mechanical quality. Indeed, as many Pentax consumer zooms, it could be built better. The 58mm filter mount is plastic made...and vulnerable.
    Considering the concurrent lenses, i rate it 5 stars. Anyway, don t try to compare it s results to those of the pro 2,8 telezooms.

    Similar Products Used:

    Canon EF 70-300mm f 4-5,6 USM
    Sigma AF 70-300mm f 4-5,6 Macro
    AF Nikkor 70-300mm f 4-5,6 G

    OVERALL
    RATING
    5
    VALUE
    RATING
    5
    [Nov 07, 2006]
    fredfloh
    Expert

    Strength:

    I can shoot a dragonfly 5' away at 320mm, and not disturb the insect using full sun or fill flash.
    The lens is a perfect lens for wildlife to retain shooting distance and permit me to stalk a Green Heron for instance and get a sequence of exposures without flushing the bird.
    The reach of the lens has let me get shots I hadn't noticed until I began to use it as a monocular and pickup game I had missed visually.
    I was considerably less impressed with the mechanical ruggedness and "feel" of third party lenses which had very high ratings, and " supersonic or hypersonic" focus motors.
    The Pentax 80-320mm lens produced pictures which I enlarged and found equivalent to similar focal-length zooms, and had a longer maximum focal length than any I found.
    I have shot almost into the sun without any form of lens shade and the lens is not as sensitive to flare as many are with lens hoods.

    Weakness:

    I can't argue with a "non-macro" 80-320mm zoom which focusses to 4.9', but I woldn't mind having a macro capability.
    I like the fine manual focus capability, but the lens does take a moment to pull focus if it begins to hunt the wrong way for autofocus.
    The outer barrel cover is plastic, but the lens feels good mechanically.

    I have been shooting Insects (Dragonflies), Birds (Green and Great Blue Heron), and Animals (Cheetah, Tiger, Zebra, Eland, Giraffe). I also have an 80-210mm zoom which had been performing beautifully, but the 80-320mm Pentax lens extends the range very significantly with excellent definition throughout the zoom range.
    I read other photographers comments about falloff in definition above 250mm, and initially believed it myself when I was shooting at 1/350 second. Then I realized that shooting it on my Pentax *ist DS gave me a field of view equivalent to a 480mm lens on a 35mm film camera. When I stabilized the lens on a tripod/monopod and/or pushed the shutter speed up over 1/750-1/1000 second the definition was there all the way out to 320mm.
    I am mounting 13"x19" prints made on a Canon i9900 printer and displayng them for sale as limited edition signed prints. I am able to crop out 20-25% shooting at ISO 200 and still make a print 13"x19".

    Customer Service

    The lens has a reassuring feel every time I use it. I purchased it used on excellent condition with the original Pentax box, and I have had no reason to consider service.

    Similar Products Used:

    I have used an 80-210mm Promaster (private-labelled Tamron) with excellent results and still like the lens. The Pentax has it covered and then some from one end of the zoom to the other so I rarely mount the lens or carry it any more. I have an older Lietz series 7 Elpro close-up lens I used extensively with the Promaster, but I use it much less now with the Pentax.
    I would recommend the low-cost and light weight of the Promaster-Tamron 80-210mm if it has enough reach for the photographer.

    OVERALL
    RATING
    5
    VALUE
    RATING
    5
    [Apr 12, 2003]
    davido
    Expert

    Strength:

    Very convenient telephoto zoom range. Sharp optics. Low flare for a consumer tele zoom. Compact size for this type of zoom, when stored in its smallest setting. Pretty good contrast. Decent build quality for a consumer zoom.

    Weakness:

    Zoom creep is so inconvenient it makes me think twice about bringing the lens along when I go out for the day of shooting. If you point the lens straight down, it will creep out to 320mm, and becomes about two feet long. But what can I say, in every other way the lens exceeds the average for consumer telephoto zooms. It's a good lens for any mid to high end amature.

    A convenient zoom range in a slightly awkward package. This lens is fairly sharp, has good contrast, and delivers a fantastic telephoto zoom range. It is softer than I hoped for at 320mm, and suffers from zoom creep so bad that you can't just hang it around your neck between shots.

    Customer Service

    Never needed.

    Similar Products Used:

    Pentax 80-200 FA f/4.7-5.6 Pentax 100-300 FA f/4.5-5.6 Pentax 28-200 FA f/3.5-6.4

    OVERALL
    RATING
    3
    VALUE
    RATING
    4
    [Apr 22, 2002]
    Pavel M
    Intermediate

    Strength:

    Surprisingly good picture quality in terms of sharpness and saturation. Quite sharp even wide-open, with a slight loss in contrast at 320 mm. Outstanding performance at f/8-11. Bright enough to stop it down to these settings and get a sufficiently short shutter speed to avoid the shake effect

    Weakness:

    Plastic all over, except for the mount. A noticeable play in the lens barrel (it never affected the picture quality, though). The focusing ring turns too easily when focusing manually. Autofocus is actually fast but it may take time to autofocus due to a long focusing ring travel (which is good, however, for manual focusing)

    I bought this lens just to be able to take pictures of Sukhoys and MIGs in the air at MAXX annual air show near Moscow. I hardly expected any outstanding results from a consumer zoom of that price. The more impressed was I with the prints! Moreover, this lens keeps delivering its small surprises even now, when I have been using it for about a year already. I can not figure out, how Asahi Optical managed to make a consumer zoom with such a low price tag and high picture quality.

    OVERALL
    RATING
    5
    VALUE
    RATING
    5
    [Feb 19, 2002]
    GavinK
    Intermediate

    Strength:

    Very sharp from 80mm to about 250mm+, thereafter still quite sharp. Very good colour and contrast. Good zoom range. Well built.

    Weakness:

    Quite loud when focusing, focusing a little slow (albeit accurate lock). A little large, long when extended, but this zooms to 320!

    An excellent lens, well worth the street price. Very sharp at all focal lengths from wide to telephoto, maybe a little softer at the full 320 end, but still sharp. Very good colour and contrast, accurate focusing, but quite noisy. Well built, if a bit large (rather long when fully extended), but comparable in size to a Canon 75-300, which looks and feels flimsy and cheap/plasticky by comparison. (and their advert says "nothing screams amateur like 3rd party lenses"? some canon cameras/lenses look more like toys!) Have the silver version. Nice finishing.

    Customer Service

    -

    Similar Products Used:

    Pentax 28-80 AF Pentax 35mm, 50mm, Takumar 135mm manual primes Tamron 24-135mm AF

    OVERALL
    RATING
    4
    VALUE
    RATING
    5
    [Jul 24, 2000]
    Joe Gee
    Intermediate

    Strength:

    great sharp lense

    Weakness:

    way to slow for bird photography

    Not to be used for fast action photography

    Similar Products Used:

    170;570 apo

    OVERALL
    RATING
    3
    VALUE
    RATING
    4
    [Feb 14, 2000]
    Gerhard von der Handt
    Expert
    Model Reviewed: SMCP-FA 80mm-320mm f/4.5-5.6

    Strength:

    It's sharp even wide open, even at max. tele position (with contrast being somewhat but not much lower

    Weakness:

    there are smaller lenses of this type: at the 320 mm position it extends enormously

    I am very satisfied with this lens.

    Similar Products Used:

    Vivitar 70-300; Soligor 60-300

    OVERALL
    RATING
    5
    VALUE
    RATING
    4
    [Dec 08, 2000]
    JIm
    Casual

    Strength:

    good sharpness at all ranges of the zoom from 80 to 320.Good for portraits in the 100 mm range.

    Weakness:

    a little long when zoomed out.

    A good long lens .My pictures are quite sharp with this lens and my Pentax zx7 combination.

    Customer Service

    not needed

    Similar Products Used:

    28 to 80 Tamron

    OVERALL
    RATING
    4
    VALUE
    RATING
    5
    Showing 1-10 of 14  

    (C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

    photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

    Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

    mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com