Kodak Polycontrast III RC Black and White Paper
Kodak Polycontrast III RC Black and White Paper
USER REVIEWS
|
[Jun 03, 2003]
BK
Casual
Strength:
tone is very good
Weakness:
too expensive Good paper and great tone Similar Products Used: AGFA Multicontrast Premium(cheaper than Kodak polycontrast) |
|
[Feb 18, 2003]
Thomas Bailey
Expert
Strength:
Readily available
Weakness:
None I think Polycontrast III RC produces good images from Tri-X and T-Max 3200. I have gotten good pictures from color negatives, for which it was not designed to do. |
|
[Feb 14, 2003]
hovi
Intermediate
Strength:
Easy to find Not very expensive Good tone range
Weakness:
None that I found Good paper for beginners. Has a good tone range and is easy to work with. I used this paper a lot and never had any problems with it and it is not that expensive if you ruin a few sheets. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Ilford Forte |
|
[Dec 23, 2000]
Marek Mezyk
Expert
Strength:
- Easly Avalaible
Weakness:
None really. If anything it lacks the punch of tone range of some Fiber Papers BUT for beginners this paper is just great. This Paper is pretty cheap. It offers good results and it dson't require any specail developers to get really god prints. Overall, I use this paper for contact sheets and 8x10 previews for a lot of my prints that I go back and print on 11x14 on fiber. Alethough the expousure sensetivity is not as touch on this paper as it is on fiber based, it still gives a very good image quality. Also, this paper is pretty good when you tone it in speia. It responds pretty well. Customer Service Good Website for technical info. Other then that I never needed it. Similar Products Used: Ilford, Kodak B&W Papers |
|
[Jun 08, 2001]
elmen chen
Professional
Strength:
none.
Weakness:
almost impossible to control the result with humen ability. polimax is too slow and have an unbearable grey fog. Customer Service not professional. no reaction and no reply when asked. Similar Products Used: ilford ,agfa, seagull. |