Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Cameras:  Film Cameras:  APS:
ELPH LT Camera

Sample Images
More Products from Canon
Link to this page

Canon ELPH LT Camera


Featured Merchants
$189.95


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: Aaron Gonzalez
 (Casual)

Review Date
March 29, 2002

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.75 of 5,
4 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 20

Price Paid:  $70.00 from Target

Summary:

Overall great package for the price. Picture quality is good, not the same as my Minolta SLR, but much clearer and sharper than my KODAK APS it replaced. Pretty tough too, dropped from 4'' off a rock face and didn''t even scratch.

Strengths:

Size, Ease of use and quality pics

Weaknesses:

On/Off switch is too easy to accidently hit, and the buttons for day/time and timer are too small.

Similar Products Used:

KODAK 535 APS, KODAK 600 APS Minolta SLR

Customer Service:

Not used yet



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Martin
 (Casual)

Review Date
May 6, 2001

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 1 of 5

Visitors rate this review
2.00 of 5,
3 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 20

Price Paid:  $125.00 from Zellers

Summary:

I bought this camera because it was small and idiot-proof. The short amount of time I had it, I liked it and was pleased with the results. BUT, after 3 rolls the lens cover jammed and wouldn't open, the flash control ceased working and I can't get the 4th roll of film out of the camera without breaking the cover. So all the convenience amounts to nothing when the camera dies after the first month.

Strengths:

Small, compact, easy to use

Weaknesses:

It broke after 3½ rolls

Similar Products Used:

None



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Eric Holt
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
January 18, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 20

Price Paid:  $60.00 from Wal-Mart

Summary:

Bought this camera last February on a trip to Wal-Mart to buy a disposable camera. Saw it so extremely cheap and decided on the whim to buy it. I could have not made a better purchase! I've taken almost 30 rolls of film over the past year with this camera, and I continue to be extremely happy with picture quality. I carry it everywhere I go so I will never miss a picture. With Fuji Nexia 200, I've gotten 8x10s made from this camera that look surprisingly great! A great purchase; I'd definately buy it again if I knew then what I know now!!!

Strengths:

Extremely small size. Great picture quality! Even looks extremely attractive.

Weaknesses:

Moderately slow lense isnt the sharpest available, but still great bang for the buck!

Similar Products Used:

This is my first real P&S camera. Had always used one-time use cameras before.

Customer Service:

Never needed. Dropped the camera once from about 3ft, still works perfectly, 4 months later.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Steven Bedoya
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
November 2, 2000

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 20

Price Paid:  $18.00 from Target

Summary:

I managed to snag a display model without a box or a strap for only $17.99, so I made a minimum investment without expecting much in return. Boy was I wrong. This camera takes some serious pictures, you just have to know how to use it. You must get used to pressing the shutter down halfway to set the focal point. It's challenging to do that if you're having someone else take a picture of you since they're unfamiliar with it. Make sure you send them to a Kodak Processsing Center (Target has these) and not some drug store. Red-eye reduction could be better, but other than that a great camera, and an ever greater buy for me!

Strengths:

Go anywhere with it...about the size of a wallet.
Excellent picture quality despite small size...if shutter used properly.
Foolproof loading.
Great quality and finish

Weaknesses:

Red eye doesn't always work.
You can't reload partially exposed film.
No zoom (more expensive models have a zoom lens)

Similar Products Used:

This is a truly unique camera!

Customer Service:

Never had a need for cust. svc.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Andrew Petrarca
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
August 10, 2000

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 20

Summary:

While it is fun and convenient to have a camera small enough to take everywhere, once the novelty of having a camera this small had worn off, I was left regretting having purchased it because its lens was inadequate to the sort of everyday snapshot shooting to which its size is suited. As a result, although I have carried the camera in my pocket to many places where I wouldn't have wanted to take a larger caamera, it has stayed in my pocket on many occasions when I would have taken it out had it had a normal lens.

Unless you know that wide-angle photos are the only type you want to take, I would strongly recommend either getting a camera with a normal range lens, or spending the 20% extra and getting a zoom lens.

Strengths:

This camera's greatest strength is it's tiny size. It's so small that that it's hardly noticable in my pocket. Since I bought it I always have a camera handy when I see something that just -needs- to be photographed.

Weaknesses:

Its biggest weakness is its wide-angle fixed focal length lens. This camera is terrible for taking snapshots of people, because the wide-angle lens leaves a choice between standing close enough to the subject that they will appear distorted in the photograph, or else standing far enough away from the subject that they are lost in a sea of extranious clutter.

The camera seems to have been designed to take wide panoramic shots, and was designed so at the expense of everything else. That's the only reason I can think of that Canon would have put a wide-angle lens on it rather than a ``normal'' angle lens. A normal lens would be much better suited to the sorts of snapshots most people want to take.

Similar Products Used:

I've used a variety of point-and-shoot cameras in other film formats over the years, but this is the first APS camera I've used.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda