Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Digital Gear:  Scanners:  Film Scanners:
Coolscan III

More Products from Nikon
Link to this page

Nikon Coolscan III


Featured Merchants
$29.95


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: Poppies Deux
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
September 15, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5,
6 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 17

Price Paid:  $180.00 from used

Summary:

I got an original Coolscan (LS10) used just this past week. It is no longer supported by Nikon, but there are some rudimentary drivers on their webpage at www.nikon-image.com. I have been eyeing digital cameras for years, but they do not have the ability to get an A4 300dpi printout quality. I have even tried scanning 4x6 prints and thought that was okay, but the moment I scanned my negatives and slides at 2700dpi on the Coolscan, I knew that this was the ONLY way to go fully digital. Digital cameras are not yet at the point where they can match the resolution of scanned film. Although lens technology has been improving steadily at a frequent pace, the quality that 35mm SLR lenses put onto film are probably within the 5-8MP range. Also, you don''t get the chromatic abberations of the lenses on digital cameras and their sensors- for some reason, a film scanner seems to be much better at this. The output of the LS10 looks great, but I still have to do lots of touch up with all the dust and scratches on my film. It is well worth it since I do touch up on anything that I print at A4. The US driver (4.14?) is not as stable as the UK (1.21) driver (all on the nikon-image site). For the amount I paid, I feel that this is the only way to get a decent high resolution image from a camera. Oh, also, the scanning times are pretty slow- about 7 minutes for a 2700dpi scan, but I don''t scan everything, just what I want to print. I used to scan my 4x6 prints, but have found that my 35mm film holds much, much more image information. I''m guessing that 4x6 prints (since I used to scan them at 200,300,600dpi) will hold no more info than a 1-2.2MP camera and depending on the way it was printed, it may have lost most of the detail in the shadows and highlights. The most remarkable thing is that (since I am looking directly off the negative), I see how good my lenses are despite how they look in prints (screw all those lens reviews you thought you could trust). 35mm cameras and lenses are pretty good from what I have seen- and for sure much better than the current crop of digitial cameras

Strengths:

sharp, high resolution, better than a 5MP digital camera

Weaknesses:

old, slow, old software, no TWAIN, No Digital ICE, manual touchup focussing

Similar Products Used:

None



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Tang Wong
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
August 15, 2001

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 17

Summary:

I bought it about 2 years ago as my first film scanner although I did try an HP-20. Overall I like it and have scanned about 200 rolls to date. I use exclusively Vuescan.

As I indicated above, it was not cheap, but compared to a high end digital camera, it is not expensive at all.

The major weakness is noise in dark areas. I am extremely careful in handling that. I even gave up sharpness for lower noise. That's why I am wondering the noise performace of LS-40 and LS-4000.

Strengths:

Digital ICE
Sharp images
Fast scan
Very robust
Automatic feeder than handles 6 images per strip

Weaknesses:

Expensive
Noise in dark areas

Similar Products Used:

None



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Steve Pargeter
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
March 10, 2001

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 17

Price Paid:  $700.00 from Abe's of Maine

Summary:

I had so many problems with the software I sent the unit back. Nikon was not able to solve my software problems - I'm running Windows ME and it got so bad I couldn't get 2 slides copied before it crashed. Unit works great - software doesn't.

Strengths:

Great scans with ICE working - with it off you notice the dust immediately

Weaknesses:

Terrible software - 2.51 and all

Similar Products Used:

None

Customer Service:

Very frustrating to deal with. Expect hour long waits on the phone.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Leif Goodwin
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
February 13, 2001

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 17

Price Paid:  $490.00 from Jessops, Slough

Summary:

A nice scanner. If you don't want greater than 12 by 8 prints, and don't scan Kodachrome, then this scanner is the business. Expect price drops when the Coolscan IV is released.

Strengths:

Nicely made. When used with Vuescan (www.hamrick.com) the results for most films are excellent. Vuescan will give multipass scanning at the expense of hugely increased scan times. ICE works and only degrades the image slightly: insignificant for 6 by 4 prints.

Weaknesses:

Poor software. (Use Vuescan instead.) Has trouble with Kodachrome due to speckle noise and flare/bleed. Can only take one slide at a time. Despite claims by some, ICE does not work on Kodachrome (it removes detail).

Similar Products Used:

Canon FS2710, Microtek Artixscan 4000T

Customer Service:

Arrogant but helpful.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Guillaume Dargaud
 (Expert)

Review Date
February 11, 2001

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 17

Summary:

Good but expensive and just plain bad software.

Strengths:

Good quality, good noise level in dark areas. Makes great scans.

Weaknesses:

ICE, no ICE, what's the difference ?
Extremely buggy software (had to reinstall several times after loosing icons and buttons at random). Real pain to use their tiny user interface 'design' on large screen.

Similar Products Used:

Canon Canoscan 2700 (extremely noisy dark areas, and even clear ones). HP 20.

Customer Service:

Never answered my email about loosing the icons/buttons. Found the answer after several hours on their website.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda