Review 1 of 3
Price Paid:
$5.00
from Penn Camera Summary: I do weddings, portraits and studio work.... up until this year, Kodak has only left me with 160VC which was great in the studio, but just didnt seem do give me any "punch" for portraits and especially outdoor wedding work. So, I heard that Kodak came out with Porta 100UC and I pounced on it. LOVED IT!!!! My blonde brides were beautifully blonde with BLAZING blue eyes, while still having perfectly white dresses. And now, outside, I can have green grass and blue skies. True, this should not be an outdoors film. I do not know why outdoor photographers are using a PORTRA film and complaining about certain colors issues. DO NOT USE A PORTRA FILM TO TAKE LANDSCAPES....well maybe mt. rushmore.... The grain has definately improved over the VC. I can blow up 20x30's with almost no grain at all...and the grain you do see is absolutely beautiful. Nice structure. It is tack sharp and gives a wonderful film latitude to mess up with. I've over and underexposed 3 stops, and it is still just goregeous. I know that people just love their NPS and NPC, but for me, Kodak just has a feel to it that those other films dont really have. Besides, NPS has that "soft" feel to it...why would you use a soft film when you can soften in photoshop... If you need to have a sharp looking photo and you only have NPS, your screwed! Strengths: Nice grain
nice latitude
beautiful colors
sharp as a tack Weaknesses: I don't know if i would commplain about the price, because if your getting paid 6 grand for a wedding, why arent you using the best film and equipment possible. Dont cut corners, use 100UC. Similar Products Used: 160NPC
160VC
400VC
|