Review 3 of 5
, from Hong Kong
Price Paid:
$331.00
from Hong Kong Summary:Contain every features that I need to play with.
Very convenient for complicated situations like multi-flash and zone system.
Very convenient, very good.
More cost effective than L-608. Strengths:Solved the 608 problems : Brighter spot meter avoid the E.u. (exposure under) error. EV1 vs EV3. (Zoom is always darker than prime.)
Water prove (I haven't tested) Weaknesses:Some people complain that Sekonic reflective meter is 2/3 step off.
Well, we have to understand that there is no ISO standard for
reflective meter. Most common assumption is 13% or 18% of reflective
index from the subject. Today's rocket science matrix TTL meter
inside the camera may even make new assumptions, which is
made mainly for P+S color film users.
Sekonic's standard was made around 50
years ago when the company was set up when there were no
TTL reflective meter inside all camera and people were using
bw film and zone system. Despite the fact that all camera now
come with a TTL meter with new assumptions about reflective
percentage, I don't think that a meter manufacturer
should change their rule from time to time, provided that
the rule is a subjective one. I just want every Sekonic
meter to be consistent, even for 100 years.
The MUST DO thing after buying a reflective meter is to
calibrate with your own camera's reflective spot meter.
I calibrated the 558 with Minolta Dynax 5's spot meter
and made -70% adjustment. Keep in mind that different
manufacturers base their assumption differently. As a
result, no matter which camera you use,
Canon, Nikon, Contax or Lecia, you must calibrate the meter
with the camera. And then use YOUR slide film and YOUR lab
and YOUR projector and your film scanner and YOUR digital
printing lab to verify your spot meter (Both Sekonic and the one inside
your camera) would produce a picture which you were trying to
produced. If you don't have this patient, PLEASE
dont' work as a photographer to ruin other people's important
event like wedding or expensive advertisement project.....
However, I am very disappointed that Sekonic didn't provide
adequate information neither in web page or user manual to
explain this.
Also, light receptor can't move vertically, which
is the only direction I want. So that the meter can be placed on a chair or table and take the measurement
in front of it. L-718 is better in this.
Other than this, there is no any bit of problem in the meter. I am very satisfied with this meter. Similar Products Used:None. Customer Service:Don't know about it in HK.
|