Home | Login | Register   REVIEW SHOP SHARE LEARN
  PhotographyReview.com          
  Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community
RSS Feed
REVIEWS:  Lenses:  35mm Zoom:
EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6
Sample Images >>

More Products from Canon >>
Link to this page
Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6

MSRP: $ 220.00

Description:
Featured Merchants

 
Sort by Latest Reviews >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: gordot
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
April 12, 2002

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 22

Price Paid:  $0.00 from Aden Camera

Summary:
This lens came with the ElanII that I got three years ago for trading in a whole whack of Minolta manual focus gear (MD-11 body, MD-28f2, MD-50f1.7, MD-85f2, a couple of Tokina zooms, ...). It''s the only lens I have, so I''ve used it for everything, which is mostly outdoor general, travel, family snaps, ... My first use of this lens (and camera) was a six week trip to Europe resulting in about 200 shots. Having this zoom range is quite useful for things like traveling as you don''t want either a big heavy lens or a whole bunch of primes to weigh you down. However, I''ve found that I''ve occasionally wanted more range - especially longer. As far as image quality is concerned, pretty much every shot was a disappointment - I wished I had kept my Minolta gear. Since then I haven''t seen any evidence that it wasn''t the lens''s fault, as I find just about all my shots are rather ordinary and lackluster. It''s hard to pick exactly what''s bad as there''s an overall lack of sharpness, clarity, saturation, contrast, brilliance, vibrancy, ... that just leaves me feeling very ho-hum about the resulting pictures. Add to that the cheap build quality, slow speed (3.5-5.6!), slowish autofocus (no USM), lack of decent manual focus ring, and rotating front element during focus, and you''ve got a lens that is nothing short of a complete waste of money for even the mildly serious. The slow speed is especially bad. At 28mm the f3.5 is acceptable, but the f5.6 at 80mm is terrible, and it means that it''s between 4 and 4.5 in the middle (35-50mm) where it will be used the most - OUCH!!!!! To be fair though, this lens is actually OK, but that''s all. It''s probably better than a high-end point-and-shoot, but just barely. If you are looking for the kind of quality that a good SLR system can deliver (as opposed to point-and-shoots), this lens will likely be a big disappointment for you as it was for me. If this is your first SLR lens and you are on a budget (and are buying a low-end EOS), or you are only ever going to use this like you would a point-and-shoot, you''ll probably be happy. But even then I''d recommend the 28-105 if you have the extra money or else just getting the 50mmf1.8 which is even cheaper but has quite good image quality. For me, I''m giving up on it. I''m tired of investing valuable time and money taking photos only to be disappointed by the re

Strengths:
lightweight and quite inexpensive useful zoom range

Weaknesses:
Cheaply built. Speed very slow. Non-USM means slowish auto-focus. Lousy manual focus ring. Front ring rotates during focus making polarizing filter harder to use. Image quality very mediocre.

Similar Products Used:
Minolta MD-28mm f2.0 Minolta MD-50mm f1.7 Minolta MD-85mm f2.0 Tokina ATX 28-85mm f3.5-4



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Vadim
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
October 24, 2001

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
2.00 of 5,
2 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 22

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:
Very BAD lens even for a beginner. The sharpness and color never satisfied me. Almost all the time I use Soligor 70-300, which makes better pictures. Try 50 f1.8, you''ll never need zoom.

Strengths:
Small.

Weaknesses:
None

Similar Products Used:
None

Customer Service:
NO



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: vino
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
October 16, 2001

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 22

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:
Got this lense with my eos 300 and used it for 6 months. I never was satisfied with the sharpness and the color of my photos then I bought the Sigma 28 - 135 and improved my the quality of my pictures by 100 %.

Strengths:
light weight

Weaknesses:
sharpness, colors

Similar Products Used:
Sigma 28 - 135

Customer Service:
never used



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Patrick Alonso
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
July 31, 2001

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 22

Summary:
This lens came with my EOS 3000 (Rebel G) and I've been using it since. It's not extremely sharp and as my experience and knowledge as grown I've started looking for better quality lens. From other reviews I get the impression that this lens will perform best at 50mm at f8/16, I will make an effort to use it in those conditions. It's not that great for night photography, the sigma 50mm lens performs a lot better. I'm looking to purchase to canon 28-135 USM IS lens to go with my Elan 7E

Strengths:
Zoom Range
Light Weight

Weaknesses:
Plastic Mount
Not extremely sharp
Focus ring is small and to smooth for my taste

Similar Products Used:
Canon 75-300
Sigma 50mm Macro



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Tommy Bostrom
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
July 18, 2001

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 22

Summary:
As I already mentioned, I´m not a professional photographer. The pictures I´ve taken from my trips in many situations (sunshine, dark, cloudy, indoors, outdoors...) have been fine to me, nothing bad to say. The few bad pictures I´ve taken haven´t been because of a bad lense... the man behind the camera isn´t always thinking...

I recommend this lense to all not-so-professional photographers.

Strengths:
Good quality pictures.
Exellent for "normal" photographers, professionals may want to invest more money...

Weaknesses:
Haven´t found any worth mentioning.

Similar Products Used:
none

Customer Service:
Ok!



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2008 PMA Tradeshow
Camera News:
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda