Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (7 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
jerry james
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: January 20, 2011
Bottom Line: i bought this teleconverter by its reviews without spending allot of money on the canon compared to almost 300.00 bucks. reviews said may have to use it in manual focas. i had it mounted on my t2i with a canon 70-300 EF is usm lens & the auto focas works perfect in daylight which i bought it for, for taking pictures of wild life hand held.if i am going to be taking pictures in low light im going to be using a tripod any way. im very happy with my purchase and dont think the canon can do any better. i would buy this teleconverter again and recomending it to my friends.
Duration Product Used: 11-20 years
Price Paid:
$149.00
Purchased At: ebay
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Brett
a CasualDate Reviewed: February 26, 2009
Bottom Line: I have a Canon XS EOS, and the 70-300 IS USM.
The Vivitar AF 7 Element 2x Teleconverter works great even with the Image Stabilzation.
Duration Product Used: 2-5 years
Price Paid:
$9300.00
Purchased At: eBay
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
ECF
a ProfessionalDate Reviewed: March 29, 2005
Bottom Line: GOOD PRO RESULTS FOR MY NIKON CAMERAS.
Duration Product Used: 11-20 years
Price Paid:
$125.00
Purchased At: B & H PHOTO
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
bobticoune
a Expert
from Montreal, Qc, CANADADate Reviewed: January 16, 2002
Strengths: - Well made
- Fully compatible with EOS systemWeaknesses: NoneBottom Line: I use it only on my CANON EF 80-200mm 2.8L
Same as the TAMRON 2x 7 elements Teleconverter. KENKO made it for TAMRON.
Duration Product Used: 11-20 years
Price Paid:
$200.00
Similar Products Used: Sigma 2x Teleconverter
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
puchacz
a Expert
from Lódz, PolandDate Reviewed: September 6, 2001
Strengths: 1) a relatively inexpensive way of getting an extra lens double the original focal length, with image quality higher than achievable by blowing up and cropping the frame
2) full AF and TTL metering linking for all Nikon users
3) quite good image quality in the centre, corners improve when the lens is stopped down
4) with the Tamron 70-300 LD it compensates the lens's pincushion distortion and produces effectively rectilinear images
5) Quite fast focusing and good image quality with the AF Nikkor 1.8/50 when stopped down two stopsWeaknesses: The 2-stop light loss is bearable with a fast lens, but with a slow telezoom such as the Tamron 70-300 F4-5.6 one gets a 140-600 F8-11 which requires stopping down one or two more stops to obtain better image quality. At 600mm the shutter speed should be at least 1/1000s to avoid blurring. Now, to shoot at 1/1000s (or preferably even faster) at F16 or F22 requires very bright light and fast, grainy films. Thus, the combination of a slow telezoom and the Kenko, although capable of producing images of at least acceptable quality, is highly impracticable.
When used with the AF Nikkor 1.8/50 produced soft corners when wide open, but improved much when stopped down 2 stops.
Produced reasonable-quality images with a Russian 300mm F4.5 (Tair3) lens wide open and improved when stopped down, but again stopping down the already slow (F9) combination is impracticable
With the Tamron lens AF is both quite precise and relatively fast in bright light at shorter focal lengths, and bearable, despite the effective aperture of F11, at the long end, but is unreliable and hunts a lot when the light and contrast are low. With the AF Nikkor 1.8/50 the AF sometimes drives the lens very fast beyond theBottom Line: For a Nikon user this converter fills a gap in the Nikon offer: Nikon's AF-I converters (besides being very expensive) are only for the long telephotos with built-in motors, and the MF AI-type ones do not provide the AF and electrical linking between AF lenses and AF cameras, which the users of the F(N)80, 65, 60, etc. need for the TTL metering to work. As a 7-element job it offers reasonable image quality, better than simpler designs. However, it seems to be most useful with fast telezooms or fixed-focal-length lenses in the tele range; the results with slow ("dark") telezooms are not very encouraging.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Price Paid:
$100.00
Purchased At: secondhand (>$200 ne
Similar Products Used: Vivitar 2x-3 (MF) - VERY unsharp except in the centre with any lens when wide open, a bit better when stopped down
Russian 2x, 5-element (MF)- just a little bit less sharp than the Kenko MC7, but v
Type of photography: Other
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (7 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |