Home | Login | Register
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Lenses:  35mm Primes:
EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

Sample Images
More Products from Canon
Link to this page

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM


Featured Merchants
$7999.99
$6716.00
$6800.00


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

jorgemonkey

( Expert)

Review Date
March 6, 2007

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 4

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:

I use this lens at my work shooting youth soccer games. All I can say about this lens is wow. It is extremely well built, is really heavy, but well worth the price.

The lens focuses really fast, and tracks the subject really well. It is tack sharp as well, and still really sharp when using it with a Canon 2x converter.

You will want a monopod or a tripod while using this lens. At least for me it is way to heavy to hand hold.

The focus ring is nice and big and easy to fine tune the focus manually. With the placement of the tripod/monopod mount the lens is pretty well balanced on the monopod, it doesn't feel like it wants to fall forward or backwards.

Strengths:

Build quality
sharpness
bokeh

Weaknesses:

price (but hey, what do you expect for a pro lens!)
weight, but no real way to get around it

Similar Products Used:

none

Customer Service:

Used Canon cust. service for a camcorder issue, they were a pleasure to deal with.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

bloomquist18

( Intermediate)

Review Date
April 22, 2004

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 4

Price Paid:  $6300.00 from Canoga Camera

Summary:

Needed something longer for Soccer. My 200 1.8 with the 1.4x was nice, but not long enough all the time. Had a hard time deciding between this and the 300 2.8 but with the 200 already, why waste my money? If you are shooting soccer or football, even baseball, this is the lens. You can really reach out and touch someone. Yea its heavy, but with a monopod its not bad. If you really want to be able to get great shots from far away, get it.......period! If you are set up with two bodies, put the 400 on a tripod, and the 200 on a monopod for close up goal action and switch between both. Or use a 70-200 instead of the 200 prime. I asked alot of questions to the pro's and the majority said if you are going to be serious about sports, you need the 400. I listened, you should too....save your money to get it!

Strengths:

Super fast, IS is great if you need it. Super sharp, maybe not as sharp as the 200 1.8, but for the additional length, so what.

Weaknesses:

NONE..............So its a little heavy.....Do you want the shot or not?

Similar Products Used:

Canon 200 f/1.8, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS

Customer Service:

Not used



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Peter Weimann
 (Professional)

Review Date
February 23, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5,
3 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 4

Price Paid:  $7000.00

Summary:

One of the perfect companions for wildlife and outdoor shootings. Delivers cristal clear chromes of outstanding quality. Nearly no losses with extenders 1,4x, a bit more with 2x. The tripod collar is mounted perfectly to avoid mirror vibration.

Strengths:

Built quality, optical performance, AF Speed, tripod collar

Weaknesses:

weight and size

Similar Products Used:

2,8/300 L IS USM, 2,8/300 L USM
4/300 L IS USM
100-400 L IS USM

Customer Service:

never needed



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Andrew Loehman
 (Expert)

Review Date
January 19, 2000

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
4.57 of 5,
7 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 4

Model Reviewed:
EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

Summary:

Canon makes some of the best telephoto lenses on the market, and in my opinion, this is one of the best they have ever made. I prefer shooting with a 300 whenever possible, simply because of size, but the picture quality and autofocus speed make this the first 400 I can actually see myself using on a regular basis. The autofocus works exceptionally well with the EOS 3 body. I also shot half a football game with a 2x teleconverter, making it an 800 5.6. The autofocus performed flawlessly with the converter, with little loss of autofocus speed.

Strengths:

This is the fastest autofocusing telephoto lens I have ever used. For a 400 2.8, it's fairly lightweight, and from what I could tell, virtually distortion free. I also like the streamlined design. It's not as boxy as the previous 400 2.8, and is easier to lug around.

Weaknesses:

None. You can feel the image stabilization mechanism whirring in the lens, but it's just something that takes getting used to. It doesn't interfere with the shooting at all.

Similar Products Used:

Canon 300 2.8, Nikon 300 2.8 AF-S.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
<< Prev 5 Reviews |

Latest Pro Reviews:
2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2008 PMA Tradeshow
Camera News:
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda