Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Lenses:  35mm Primes:
Planar T* 85mm f1.4

Sample Images
More Products from Contax
Link to this page

Contax Planar T* 85mm f1.4


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

foto2011

( Professional)

Review Date
May 5, 2009

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 13

Price Paid:  $700.00 from eBay

Summary:

My sample is an AE version, Made in West Germany.

This is an outstanding lens which displays a superb combination of sharpness, low distortion and good bokeh. This combination makes it an excellent portrait lens.

Wide open, it is sharp in the centre and there is a distinct softness at the edges. Background bokeh is smooth and the transition between in-focus and out of focus areas of the shot gives an almost 3D effect.

Stopping down to f/2.8 yields sharpness across the frame and this is optimised at f/4. There is no need to stop down further except to obtain more depth of field. As expected, resolution deteriorates after f/11 due to diffraction.

I have used the Nikon 85mm f/1.4 AIS which has a remarkably similar optical design, but doesn't quite equal the Zeiss design, and the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L which lacks the sophistication of either, but offers an extra 0.5 stop. Of the three lenses, the Zeiss optical design is clearly the best.

I used this lens on a Contax 167MT and various Canon SLRs and DSLRs using adapters.

Strengths:

High resolution
Excellent contrast
Smooth bokeh
Lack of distortion
Excellent build quality

An outstanding portrait lens, also suited to general medium tele work.

Weaknesses:

None that I can see.

Similar Products Used:

Canon 50mm f/1.2 L
Nikon 50mm f/1.4 AIS

Customer Service:

Never needed.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Leo Klaphem
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
July 1, 2003

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Used product for
1 to 3 months

Visitors rate this review
1.35 of 5,
31 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 13

Price Paid:  $450.00 from dealer

Summary:

When I use small aperture such as f11 and f16 with studio flash the images are still not sharp enough.The colour is not good enough either.In view that the lens cost even less than the Minolta lens but the resolution and the colour rendition are poor too,I write this review to express my dissatisfaction with CONTAX.

Strengths:

None....

Weaknesses:

Poor optics from GREAT CZ

Similar Products Used:

Minolta 85/1.4 D, Minolta 100/2, Minolta 200/4 macro, Minolta 100/2.8 macro D, Minolta 80-200/2.8 APOHS Rented Canon 85/1.4; Canon 100/2.8 macro; Canon 300/2.8



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Christin
 (Expert)

Review Date
February 9, 2003

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 13

Price Paid:  $500.00

Summary:

Zesis Fans must have

Strengths:

Super sharp Best bokeh lens on this planet Great color Great performance at f/4

Weaknesses:

focus only up to 1 meter

Similar Products Used:

Nikon 105mm F2.5

Customer Service:

none



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: jutan
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
October 18, 2002

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
4 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 13

Price Paid:  $690.00 from Alex photo and Camer

Summary:

The 85mmF1.4 was the best amoung the short tele photo of the zeiss range( range 70 - 180 )except 135F2.0. The 1.4 f stop produce soften sharp image that is good for potraiture.My personal encounter with the MM and AE mount type Both made in W.Germany. These are my commences; Both are different. The older AE type will have a better colour redition than the MM type under tunsten lighting night shots and the MM tend to biased to reddish hue. From the first appearance from pictures ,the MM has a more dynamic appeal than the AE type. but if you are comparing the shadow detail the AE have much better resolving power. Come to sharpness at infinity the AE will able to produced fine razor sharp detail while the MM will tend toward softer image . At closed shot the AE will suffer some vigenet at the 4 corners but the MM will not appear.Overall MM tend to be more contrast which lead me to believe there are some changes in the the optical construction. But I'm very much convinced Zeiss had strive to maintain and enhanced the standard but they may have introduced new glass material to remain competitive.The sharpness of this AE lens is great as comparable to 50 mm F4 CF lens but CF is still a more superior lens overall.

Strengths:

Short compact and bright. with 2X mutar will extend to 170mm good value at street price of $690.

Weaknesses:

Never encounter

Similar Products Used:

Nikon 85mm 1.4; Hassablad 50mm f4 CF lens

Customer Service:

Never send for local service yet. No Commence.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: SingLO
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
September 17, 2002

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 13

Price Paid:  $860.00 from Hong Kong

Summary:

This is a fellow-up of my previous review. After two years of using it regularly, it still remains one of my favourite lenses. This lens is one of the best portrait lenses (although some would say Marko-Planar 100 is as good). I always use it for studio and outdoor portrait. It is definitely worth buying the Contax 67mm dedicated rubber hood to go with it. This lens was orginally developed for the Contarex system. It is a bit sharper than the famous Contarex Sonnar 85/2 which I also own. I believe the new Contax N 85/1.4 has the same basic design and construction.It is not only useful for portrait but also great for general landscape, architectual and low light photography. I needed to clarify the point about Made in Japan vs Made in Western lens issue. Carl Zeiss told me that there is absolutely no difference in term of performance and construction between the old W. German made AE lenses and the new Japanese made MM lenses. All those things said by the dealers are pure fairy tales! The only difference is that "made in West Germany" is more "purely Zeiss" in collector's mind.

Strengths:

Nice "Bo-ke" of the out-of-focus areas when it is used wide-opened. Ideal for tight head portrait. The lens is pin-sharped when stopped down. Natural reproduction of subtle tone and hue.

Weaknesses:

Sometimes it is a bit too sharp for portrait: it shows every pores and spots of the model face in tight head shot with diffused daylight. I would recommend the use of the ultra-high qulaity soft filter: 67mm Softar I ( but costs around $170).

Similar Products Used:

Zeiss Contax 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 180/2.8 and 500/8. Zeiss Contarex 85/2 and 50/2.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>
 
More Review Content
More Reviews & Related Pages
 
Latest Reviews >>
Latest Products >>
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Camera Accessory Pro Reviews >>
Manufacturer Review Pages >>
Buyers Guides >>
Digital Camera Review Categories >>
Lens Review Categories >>
Reviews Index >>
Camera Review Archives >>
Digital Camera Sample Photos >>
Photography & Camera Forums >>
Write A Review >>
 
 
News
Latest Digital Camera & Photography News.
 

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda