Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 4 (4 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
tmaltby
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: May 20, 2004
Strengths: A superb copying lens!!Weaknesses: Flare when shooting into very strong bright light outdoors.Bottom Line: Outstanding lens for copy work! I use it with a 4-light copy stand to duplicate family photos going back 100 years for which negatives no longer exist. I load Technical Pan into my R8 set on the MANUAL exposure metering setting, determine correct exposure with a gray card, and easily copy photo after photo after photo. The results are stunning! I develop the film in Technidol and am always 100% pleased with the sharpness and tonality this lens produces!
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Ray Moth
a Intermediate
from Jakarta, IndonesiaDate Reviewed: June 22, 2001
Strengths: Superb reproduction from 1:2 (or 1:1 with macro extender) up to infinity. For optimum results, the lens should be stopped down to at least f/8 in the macro range. Colours are rendered very well and the image is sharp from the centre to the corners. Superb bokeh (quality of out-of-focus areas). Flat field, ideal for document copying. Deeply recessed front element needs no lens hood.Weaknesses: A little bulkier than a 50mm "standard" lens, owing to its macro construction.Bottom Line: I use it as my standard lens, since I don't usually need an aperture wider than f/2.8. If bought used, it's a fraction of the new price and there are usually plenty of examples available on the market. This was once the macro lens by which all others were judged.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Price Paid:
$500.00
Purchased At: Jakarta
Similar Products Used: Olympus Zuiko 50mm/3.5 macro.
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Douglas Herr
a Expert
from Sacramento, California Date Reviewed: July 3, 2000
Strengths: Crisp bright colors, solid construction excellent detail rendition, good flare control.Weaknesses: I've had occasional problems with flare when the sun is just outside the picture area which I *think* is related to reflections from surfaces inside the mirror box of the Leicafelx SL.Bottom Line: The color quality more than anything else distinguishes photos made with this lens from the Micro-NIKKOR photos. Color saturation with the Nikkors is not nearly as rich or clean as with the Macro-Elmarit-R
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Similar Products Used: Nikon 55mm f/3.5 Micro, Nikon 55mm f/2.8 Micro
Type of photography: Landscapes
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
rath otto
a Intermediate
from toronto, ontario canadaDate Reviewed: December 1, 1999
Strengths: very good contrast and flat field.snappier slides than my micro-nikkor 55.
i use it as standard lens,performance at infinity is excellent as well.mechanically very smooth focussing,but solid mount is heavy.use no sunshade,very deeply recessed elements.
Weaknesses: a bit heavyBottom Line: leitz lens quality of the highest order,ditto for price,but it will keep you happy for long time.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Similar Products Used: nikon 2.8/55mm optically ok. too,but mount develops far more play over time.
occasionally still use my oldest kilar 2
Type of photography: Other
|
Reviews 1 - 4 (4 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |