Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 4 (4 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Furiosi
a ProfessionalDate Reviewed: March 23, 2011
Strengths: Holds highlights well.
Nice rendering of skin tones.
Pleasing bokeh.Weaknesses: It's a large lens (for the Zuiko line).
Too low in contrast at f/2.Bottom Line: I agree with reviewers who describe this lens has having very pleasing qualities. It renders skin tones nicely, holds highlights well, and has very pleasing bokeh. In fact, I prefer the "look" of pictures taken with this lens to my pre-asph Leica Summilux, a lens I have used for years and simply love. However, I don't think the Zuiko 50/2 is comparable to a lens like the 50mm Summicron (others here have compared compared it to the Cron) simply because the 50/2 macro is not very good at f/2--that's a major drawback for a lens that is being compared to the Summicron and a deal breaker for anyone who might need to use the lens wide open. In fact, I would describe the lens as unusable at f/2; it's just way too low contrast. At f/2.8 it's much improved. So in short, yes, the lens has characteristics that are highly recommendable, but I'm replacing it with a 50mm that I can confidently shoot with at f/2. If you don't need the f/2, you'll likely love this lens.
Duration Product Used: 6-10 years
Price Paid:
$425.00
Purchased At: KEH
Similar Products Used: Leica 50mm Summilux (pre-asph)
Zuiko 40mm f/2
Nikon 50mm f/2 AI
Nikon 50mm f/1.4 AF
Type of photography: People
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
flowerside
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: May 4, 2004
Strengths: Build quality, optical performances, macro feature, speed (especially as a macro lens), versatility, consistency of results in every shooting conditions.Weaknesses: Handling (looks *big* on an OM-4Ti), price, availability. In addition it shares with the Zuiko 100mm f/2.0 a tendency to collect dust inside because of its rear group recessing deeply into the lens barrel when focused to close objects.Bottom Line: Got this lens recently and it took less than one week to became my all-time favorite. It helped me produce the best pictures I've ever taken, used both as a standard lens and as a semi-macro. This lens has a terrific "character", producing images that not only have an excellent resolution and contrast, but a unique feel which cannot be conveyed in words (y'know, something like all that talking about Leica magic). Definitely a top performer and a lens I'll never get rid of. Justifies the buying of an Olympus body only to be used and appreciated.
Duration Product Used: 2-5 years
Price Paid:
$460.00
Purchased At: Used at KEH.com in E
Similar Products Used: Olympus Zuiko 50mm f/1.4
Olympus Zuiko 50mm f/1.8
Type of photography: Fine Art
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Marcelo Guarini
a Intermediate
from Santiago - ChileDate Reviewed: October 12, 2000
Strengths: Super sharp, excellent contrast and color performanceWeaknesses: Just a little bit bulky in the OM4-T bodyBottom Line: I agree with the reviewer Mr. Mike Johnston, this is the best normal lens I have ever used. It is clearly better than the last version of the 50 mm f2.0 Summicron-M, which I currently own. I have also compared its performance with some of my friends Cannons and Nikons normal lenses, and this Zuiko is the sharpest. Although I seldom use it for macro photography, its performance as such is also great.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Similar Products Used: 50 mm f2.0 Summicron-M, 50 mm f3.5 macro Zuiko.
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Mike Johnston
a Expert
from Woodstock, IL USADate Reviewed: December 17, 1999
Strengths: Perfect all-purpose normal lens. Great sharpness, speed, close-focus, angle of view.Weaknesses: n/aBottom Line: This is one of the great little-known "sleepers" among 35mm camera lenses. I honestly think it's a better lens in virtually every way than the vaunted Leica 50mm Summicron. Unlike most macros, it's fast enough, and the right focal length, to use as a normal lens. Ironically, its only shortcoming might be its macro performance--I don't think it quite matches some of the competition at true macro distances, although it's good. But used as a normal lens, it's hard to match, let alone beat, at any price. P.S. I'm Editor-in-Chief of _PHOTO Techniques_ magazine (www.phototechmag.com).
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Similar Products Used: I've been a professional camera reviewer for a dozen years so I've used hundreds of 35mm lenses.
Type of photography: Fine Art
|
Reviews 1 - 4 (4 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |