Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (75 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
poker
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: March 22, 2010
Strengths: Weather-resistant construction
Affordable L series lens
Light weight
Weaknesses: The lens hood blocks the built in flash in my former Canon 30DBottom Line: I use to have the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8. I sacrificed the f2.8 max aperture for Canon L glass and build quality. I'm glad I did. My past Tamron accumulated much dust over its use and non-Canon lenses have poor resale value. the image quality from this lens is what you would expect from a Canon L: series lens. The f4 aperture has been enough for my occasional indoor non-flash shots.
This lens on full frame has a fun yet mild fish eye effect. On a 1.6 crop factor DSLR, it's a good walk around lens.
My only problem is that the lens hood blocked the pop up flash on my past Canon 30D.
Duration Product Used: 11-20 years
Price Paid:
$750.00
Purchased At: Canoga Camera
Similar Products Used: Tamron 17-50 f2.8
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
UsaFromAbove
a ProfessionalDate Reviewed: August 23, 2009
Bottom Line: Excellent Lens!
The 17-40 I mostly use it for real estate photography on a 5D. I also use it for aerial pictures although it is a bit heavy for it.
For interior shots it is great because you need not worry about the F/4.
Image quality is also good. Weight for average use is good as well.
It is good at wide 17, however there is distortion as you can see: www.usafromabove.com
Look for the interior pictures. I have tried to eliminate distortion but I couldn’t 100%
I would recommend it.
Duration Product Used: 6-10 years
Price Paid:
$700.00
Purchased At: ebay
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Gary Lee
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: December 4, 2007
Strengths: Sharp,fast focus, handles great,dynomite colors--OUTSTANDING!Weaknesses: None
Bottom Line: This is a great lens! I was surprised at how fast it will focus and how sharp the photos are. I only wish I would have purchased it years ago. I have photos that would have been great if they had been taken with this lens. This is my first L lens, but a 70-200 F4 will be on it's way next week. also, I can't say enough good things about ordering from B&H. This was the fifth time I have ordered from them, and I have never had a problem.
If you are looking for a great wide angle zoom, THIS IS IT! A great match for my 20D, and I am sure it will be great for the Canon 5D that is in my near future.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Price Paid:
$629.00
Purchased At: B&H
Similar Products Used: Canon 18-55--Canon 28F 2.8--
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Lior Dagan
a ExpertDate Reviewed: September 12, 2007
Strengths: Weight, overall picture quality.
Price (especially refurbished).
This camera has WAY better build than my sigma 24-70 f/2.8, and picture quality, and AF is MUCH faster on my 20DWeaknesses: Not f/2.8, could use a wider zoom range.Bottom Line: I have bought this lens refurbished at Adorama.
My powerhorse lens, no doubt, on my Canon 20D Camera.
I have used it in:
Thailand, China, Ski tours, the Israeli desert, skiing resorts in Europe, California, Canada, from below freezing to scorching heat.
0 problems. I\d give it a 4, as larger zoom range and IS would make it a 5.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Purchased At: Adorama
Similar Products Used: Sigma 24-70 f/2.8
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
yalazy
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: August 26, 2007
Strengths: Great build quality and nice to use. Good colours.Weaknesses: First, I use it on a Canon 5D, so weaknesses are more obvious than on an APS-C sensor camera. I find it a bit on the soft side, and corners definitely soft at f/8. On the other hand I have not owned a critically sharp wide-angle that goes down to 20mm or less. I previously owned the 16-35/2.8 (first version), and it was also very soft in the corners, but a little sharper in the center.Bottom Line: Good value for money.
Duration Product Used: 6-10 years
Similar Products Used: Tokina 17/3.5, Canon 20/2.8, Canon 16-35/2.8, Canon 10-22 on 20D
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (75 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |