Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (167 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
AFotographer
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: August 30, 2010
Strengths: Price / performance ratio is pretty good
IS works well
Weaknesses: AF can be a bit flaky
One-lens-fits-all design results in compromises that won't suit everybody
Bottom Line: It's not bad....but it's not great either, especially if you try and compare it to far more expensive lenses (which for some reason a lot of the reviewers here seem to be doing). But this is not an expensive lens. It looks, feels and performs like a reasonable walkabout lens.
If you're a professional photographer then you won't want one. If you're solely taking landscape photo's then you won't want one. If you spend your time on portrait photos, you won't want one. If you only do macro shots, then guess what? You won't want one.
But, if you're not a professional and need a general purpose zoom lens for around £300 (new, UK price) then this is a very attractive proposition.
Let's not also forget - the lens is only as good as the rest of the hardware you are using. If you have a £2000 body, £1000 printer and £800 monitor then of course you're going to see more defects in the photos, using a £300 lens!
I've got this lens on a Canon 500D body and am very happy with the combination.
So, with all this in mind, it gets 4 stars value rating and 2 stars Overall. Yes, there a re infinitely better lenses available, but not for the same money.
Duration Product Used: 6-10 years
Price Paid:
$200.00
Purchased At: Ebay (used)
Similar Products Used: Several
Type of photography: People
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Tristan Massey
a ProfessionalDate Reviewed: July 31, 2010
Strengths: Good at sucking the money out of your wallet for a piece of crap.Weaknesses: Just about everything.Bottom Line: This lens is one of the worst lenses i have ever tried, in my entire 35 years of photography. End of story. Definitely NOT worth even the $100 i paid for it.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Price Paid:
$100.00
Purchased At: Friend
Similar Products Used: I have used many lenses, I own 24 myself. This is by far the worst.
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
steve bailey
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: May 5, 2008
Strengths: Good range, decent sharpness, can be used on film cameras, too.Weaknesses: Some zoom creep
Not super small
can pick up dustBottom Line: A strong lens for light but serious travel photography on crop digital. I match it with the Tokina 12-24 f4(an excellent lens) and get 19-200+ range on the digital Rebel, with IS on the upper end. Though it's a slow lens, that's not as bad on the digitals as the Canon CMOS makes great pictures at high ISO's. I also use it on my EOS 3 for film shots and it does a good job there, too. If you get a good copy, you'll be very pleased. (I shoot RAW any way and my shots are always a bit neutral until I post process; the lens provides good detail for that.)
Duration Product Used: 11-20 years
Price Paid:
$350.00
Purchased At: friend
Similar Products Used: Canon 50 1.8, 35 2, 28-70 2.8L, 70-200 4L
Tokina 12-24 f4
Type of photography: Outdoor
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
tim Geraghty-Groves
a ExpertDate Reviewed: April 26, 2008
Strengths: Build QualityWeaknesses: Everything elseBottom Line: Crap. I've had this lens now for 18mths and I'm always questioning the quality of the images. I've taken it on 4 overseas trips as a walkaround lens and I have never been happy with the images when I have returned.
The fall out of quality towards the edges at any focal lenght is unaceptable for a lens of this price. I use this lens with a UV filter and a CR Pl filter and the brightness in the view finder on my 30D is so low. I have had it back to Canon twice for repairs over the time that I have had it, both times the AF would be incorrect at the full wide and full zoom. The IS would never settle upon focusing and the image would "jump" in the view finder.
I have now started to use the 70 to 300mm kit lens more often again as that lens seems to be more reliable in focasing and image results. (bad indictment for the AU$780 28-135mm lens)
If I had known that this lens was as bad as it was I would have sunk the money into a 70-200 f/4 L and done away with the loss in focal lenght from between my 10 to 22mm canon (which is a far more superior quality lens for the money compared to the 28 to 135mm) and the "L" series.
If I had paid AU$200 for this lens I wouldn't mind, but the premium price does not reflect the quality of the lens that you get.
Other Lens that I use and have done direct comparisons too are:
Canon 50mm f/1.8 macro
Canon 85mm f/1.8 Macro
Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro
Canon 10-22mm f/3.5
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5 Kit lens
Canon 70-300mm f/3.5 Kit lens
If you are interested I have comparitive Koren lens test files between the 28-135mm, 70-300mm and the 100mm for a true comparison.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Price Paid:
$780.00
Similar Products Used: Canon 50mm f/1.8 macro
Canon 85mm f/1.8 Macro
Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro
Canon 10-22mm f/3.5
Canon 18-55mm f/3.5 Kit lens
Canon 70-300mm f/3.5 Kit lens
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
tourtrophy
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: May 5, 2007
Strengths: IS making indoor shooting quite convenient without using a flash.
Good value for its price.
Good zoom range
solidly built even though it 's plasticWeaknesses: FIlter for such lens size is expensive
Range not low enough to cover wide angle on 1.6x crop camerasBottom Line: THis lens has a decent zoom range which is actually quite good for portrait. IS works quite well in low light conditions, but still I would get occasional blurred pictures. However, it works much bettern than one without IS.
Picture quality is what I have expected. It 's not tack sharp but OK.
However, autofocus is fast and precise.
This is my walkaround lens replacing the 18-55mm kit lens
Duration Product Used: 11-20 years
Price Paid:
$399.00
Purchased At: Costco
Type of photography: Outdoor
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (167 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |