Home | Login | Register
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Lenses:  35mm Zoom:
28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 D

Sample Images
More Products from Konica Minolta
Link to this page

Konica Minolta 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 D


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

Bahuddha

( Beginner)

Review Date
October 16, 2005

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Visitors rate this review
4.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 13

Price Paid:  $0.00 from ebay

Summary:

This lens came as a camera mount cap for my Maxxum 7 and that should be its only purpose. I tried it out to see how it would do. I was fortunate to have my neighbor come by and allow me to take pictures of her. The results were overly warm - orange - and the sharpness was awful. The color rendition was way off. I pulled out my Minolta 28-100 (another story in it self)to use on the Maxxum 7 and the color was right on, the sharpness and contrast was right on as well.

Strengths:

None to mention

Weaknesses:

Poor focus, contrast and color rendition.

Similar Products Used:

Minolta 28-100mm 3.5-5.6 -reasonable at close quarters Minolta 100mm Macro -excellent lens

Customer Service:

Haven't used it yet



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

dre_2ooo

( Intermediate)

Review Date
September 15, 2005

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 13

Price Paid:  $35.00 from ebay

Summary:

A truly terrible lens in all aspects, except convenience. It is possible to see the poor image quality even in a 4 x 6. I guess that this would be an okay lens for a beginner are snapshots on a family vacation. However, I don't see any reason why you wouldn't use a digital camera for snapshots. If you want to take "professional-minded" pictures, shoot on slide film, or make quality enlargements, this is not the lens for you.

Strengths:

-light weight -convenient zoom range -price

Weaknesses:

-poor contrast and sharpness -the flimsy feel and build -plastic mount -made in Malaysia, not Japan -front elemental rotates when focusing

Similar Products Used:

Minolta 28-105 (Very good) Minolta 50 1.7 (Excellent) Minolta 70-210mm f/4 (Good-Great)



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Jeff M
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
December 15, 2003

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
2.33 of 5,
3 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 13

Price Paid:  $0.00 from Pitman Photo (rip-of

Summary:

When I started photgraphy this lens was adequate but when i got my next lens (75-300mm f/4.5-5.6) I noticed the difference right away. The telphoto zoom was a lot sharper and brighter. Although the 75-300mm is by no means a professioinal quality lens its is clearly better than the 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6. I dont think this lens should represent a company with some of the best optics around, like Minolta. Minolta is way better then waht this lens ofers. But lets face it it comes with an SLR for very cheap so what can you expect?

Strengths:

Cheap Its good for a casual photographer

Weaknesses:

Many, see above

Similar Products Used:

Maxxum 75-300mm

Customer Service:

None needed



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Peter
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
September 3, 2003

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 13

Price Paid:  $180.00 from UK pounds with Dynax

Summary:

Two or three previous posters under this product have actually reviewed a different version of the lens. Older lenses, such as those which came with the 505 and 404 models, are not the D lens which is intended for review here. The key value of this lens is its inexpense and its light weight. The cameras with which it ships as standard currently (Dynax/Maxxum 5 and 4) are likewise aimed at this market. Therefore one cannot expect professional results from it. That said, I have used it extensively for travelling when my heavier lenses are too much of a burden, and it fulfills this market admirably. My landscape photography is sharp and contrasty. Sharpness is adequate up to prints of 8x12 from Reala 100 (quality print film), when using a tripod and on full manual mode, apeture set around f8. I rather suspect that some disappointed reviewers are using very small/large arpetures or are using cheap filters, shooting into the sun, or using slow shutter speeds or even worse, firing the fill flash. All of these things will worsen an image from any lens. It is certainly true that my more expensive lenses give better results, but you'd need to be enlarging heavily to notice it. It is a worthy learning lens.

Strengths:

Price, weight, advanced 'D' flash metering. Small filter size (cheaper)

Weaknesses:

Lightweight build, after several months mine took a hard knock and ceased functioning. Supplied lens hood not particularly effective.

Similar Products Used:

Various Pentax manual focus prime lenses, Minolta autofocus lenses.

Customer Service:

Have used Minolta UK customer service for fixing a light leak problem with my Maxxum 5 - they took 4 weeks but were good about keeping me up to date.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Guneshwor L
 (Beginner)

Review Date
February 10, 2003

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 2 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5,
2 votes

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 13

Price Paid:  $0.00 from TEDD'S

Summary:

This lens comes to me as part of a kit when i was puchasing my Minolta Dynax 404si.I am a beginner in photography.I have taken around 5/6 film rolls shot with this lens.I like the silver look of this lens.Zooming is quite pleasant except that it is somewhat tight around the wide angle end.Focussing is also very accurate.Depth of field scale is missing. As far as the optical quality is concerned,i will say that it is not good.The quality of print is not better than the P/S cameras.Sharpness is poor at almost all f-stops & when the prints are enlarged beyond 6x8 , it is very poor to worse.Definitely this lens is not for the serious amateurs.I am planning to buying one of the primes,either 50mm/1.4 or 1.7 which has been appreciated by many of the photographers. But surprisingly the colour rendition is good & vignetting is well under control.Till now i have not encountered any flare problem.

Strengths:

smooth zooming & focusing ,silver look good colour rendition,vignetting well under control price

Weaknesses:

poor sharpness & resolution , can't be reproduced beyond 6x8 size

Similar Products Used:

Nil



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2008 PMA Tradeshow
Camera News:
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda