Home | Reviews | Lenses | 35mm Zoom | Sigma

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro 35mm Zoom

3.57/5 (7 Reviews)
Focal Length : 70mm - 300mm | Max. Aperture : f/4-f/5.6  | Focus : Autofocus  


  • MPN508110
    Product ID26793913
    Weight19.4 oz
    Length4.8 in
    Lens TypeZoom Lens
    Closest Focusing Distance37.4 in
    Diameter3 in
    Camera FormatDigital SLR
    Attachment / Filter Size58 mm
    Focus TypeAutofocus
    Min Aperturef/22
    Picture Angle8.2 - 34.3 degrees
    Focal Length70mm - 300mm
    Groups / Elements14 Elements in 10 Groups
    Diaphragm Blades9 Blades
    Lens Max Aperturef/4-f/5.6
    Macro LensWith Macro Lens
    Macro Magnificationx 0.5
    Designed for Digital CameraYes

Product Description

The high performance telephoto zoom lens is ideal for digital SLR cameras. This lens has two SLD glass elements in the front lens group and one in the rear lens group It is able to shoot with maximum magnification 1:2 at the focal length of 300 mm.
  • Aperture range: f/4-5.6
  • Min focus: 150cm / (95cm Macro mode) 59.1 in. / (37.4 in. Macro mode)
  • Available for: SIGMA, CANON, NIKON (D), MINOLTA, PENTAX


  • Review Options:  Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating

    Reviews 1 - 5 (7 Reviews Total) | Next 15

    User Reviews

    Overall Rating:1
    Value Rating:1
    Submitted by bundleme a Intermediate

    Date Reviewed: November 11, 2010

    Strengths:    I don't know

    Weaknesses:    WON'T WORK ON MY 20D

    Bottom Line:   
    Hi, i bought this sigma 70-300mm APO Macro on ebay and i put it on
    my canon 20d camera and it took five pictures and i got the dreaded
    err99. I took it off and clean the contacts with an erazer and put it
    back on and the err99 came up again. This time i removed the battery,
    waited about 5 minutes and put battery back in and i still came up with
    err99. It just won't work with my canon 20d, maybe it's the firmware.
    Are there any answers to this madness. I like the lens and it's in mint
    condition but it does not work on my 20d.

    Expand full review >>

    Duration Product Used:   2-5 years

    Price Paid:    $14000.00

    Purchased At:   ebay

    Similar Products Used:   Used my canon 75-300mm ultrasonic lens and it worked.

    Type of photography:   Outdoor


    Overall Rating:4
    Value Rating:4
    Submitted by Christopher Pan a Intermediate

    Date Reviewed: October 18, 2007

    Strengths:    Value for money, sharp and produce natural colour.

    Weaknesses:    The zoom ring is heavy compare to my other zoom lenses. Focus hunting in low light (for me is acceptable), and a little bit soft at the end of the zoom 300mm (need to stop down to correct the result).

    Bottom Line:   
    The lense is good compare to the price you pay. Quite sharp and bright. You can find a little bit soften at the end of 300mm, you need to stop down a bit to get crispier result. The Bokeh also acceptable. Macro 1:2 is a bonus for this lense.
    Over all this lense is reliable, especially when you hunt outdoor. Value more than what you pay.

    Expand full review >>

    Duration Product Used:   2-5 years

    Price Paid:    $195.00

    Purchased At:   Seasons Photo

    Similar Products Used:   No other Sigma Lense Used

    Type of photography:   Outdoor


    Overall Rating:5
    Value Rating:5
    Submitted by kfahn a Intermediate

    Date Reviewed: July 20, 2006

    Strengths:    #1 Price. Without a doubt this is the star shining upon this lens. At less than $200, this lens provides fantastic results.

    #2 Macro Mode. With a 1:2 macro mode, this is not true (1:1) macro, but in this price range, there is nothing near this lens. Though I did not intend to use this when the lens was purchased, I found myself using it often for floral and other photography. The results are very good, and in ideal instances are almost comparable to a true macro lens.

    #3 Image Quality. In this price range, there is no other lens that can deliver results like this. With proper technique, this lens can produce wonderful portraits, sports shots, and macro. It has fantastic versatility.

    #4 Build quality. It starts off with an all metal mount, and continues through to the well textured finish on the outside, finishing with consistently strong and durable internals.

    #5 Included case and lens hood. This is a constant irritation for me with Canon. They do not do this simple service of providing lens hoods for their customers. Thank you Sigma.


    Weaknesses:    #1 Focusing:
    a) Speed. The focusing motor tends to be a little sluggish, especially when at the end of the focal range.

    b) Accuracy. I am fairly certain that this ties in with the speed of the focusing, but I find that probably 1 in 10 shots is slightly misfocused.

    c) Sound. This lens makes a noticeable noise when focusing, though not enough to scare off any but the most skittish subjects.

    #2 Physical length. The length of this lens is normal by most standards, (122mm at 70mm), but when in macro mode and zoomed all the way in to 300mm, this lens is over 200mm long. This makes it a little more difficult to handhold the lens.

    #3 Speed. The wide open f/4 at 70mm quickly raises a stop at 130mm and at 175 or so goes to f/5.6. This makes handholding the lens in less than optimal light difficult to say the least. This, however is a failing of every budget lens, so not as much a weakness as it is something to be aware of.

    #4 Due to this being a third party lens, future compatibility with other camera bodies may become an issue.


    Bottom Line:   
    Overall, this is one of the best budget telephoto zoom lens that is in production. I bought this to compliment my Canon 350D, and it has treated me well. The alternatives all leave much to be wanted. For instance, the Canon 75-300mm, is slower to focus, softer at all focal lengths, and has a lower build quality. The Tamron 70-300mm has similar properties to the Sigma, but I have found the build quality lacking as well.

    Expand full review >>

    Duration Product Used:   2-5 years

    Price Paid:    $199.00

    Purchased At:   http://www.BHPhotovi

    Similar Products Used:   Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III -
    +
    Cheap.
    -
    Soft throughout focal range.
    Strong CA and most f/stops.
    Low build quality.

    Canon 70-210mm f/3.5-4.5 USM -
    +
    High quality build.
    Good quality photos.
    Very fast, silent, and accurate ring-USM focusing.
    Can be found for ~$200 used.
    -
    Not produced any more.
    Shorter range.
    Zoom creep.




    Overall Rating:4
    Value Rating:5
    Submitted by tecomella a Expert

    Date Reviewed: July 10, 2006

    Strengths:    1. Minimal chromatic aberrations at wide open. Even high contract shots are passable.
    2. Relatively sharp at wide open at 300mm (Than competition)
    3. Good Macro mode
    4. Good build quality and finish
    5. relatively silent (Of course nothing compared to silent wave) but better than competition.
    6. Good focusing accuracy, say 85% in normal conditions


    Weaknesses:    1. Focus sometims hunts at 300mm in low contrast situations and confusing backgrounds. otherwise spot on
    2. Front of lens rotates when focussing


    Bottom Line:   
    Considering the price I paid for this lens, I am not complaining at all of focusing speed, slow aperture,VR etc. If this lens would have had everything, Sigma would price it at 1200$.
    So lets move ahead.
    This lens is an extention of my birding hobby and is a great companion on my birding trips. The versatile macro lets you grab the mini world of insects, flowers, lizards, etc. A big plus for naturalists.
    Combining it with my D50 delivers good punchy colours, thanks to the APO lens elements.
    A very big plus in my opinion is the minimal Chromatic aberrations at wide open shots. On my 6MP D50, CA is hardly visible even in high contrast situations.
    A must buy for all those looking for a long end zoom and don't want to sell their car.

    Expand full review >>

    Duration Product Used:   6-10 years

    Price Paid:    $222.00

    Purchased At:   India

    Type of photography:   Outdoor


    Overall Rating:2
    Value Rating:4
    Submitted by THOMAS LUK a Casual

    Date Reviewed: July 7, 2006

    Strengths:    Liight weight and feel quite sturdy

    Weaknesses:    focus quite slow with low contrast subject and quite noisy when focusing

    Bottom Line:   
    For a cheap lense (compared to Nikon or Canon), we have to accept some scrifice. Relative speaking, it is a good outdoor lense since we always stop down to F 8 at least. Having used it mainly for my Canon EOS 10D in the last 2 years, I am quite happy with it. When I compared this lense with my friend's Canon 70-300 IS, at F11, the difference is quite small in case of sharpness.

    Expand full review >>

    Duration Product Used:   21+ years

    Price Paid:    $1280.00

    Purchased At:   authorized dealer Ma

    Similar Products Used:   Canon 20, 28, 50, 60, 85, 100, 135, 200, 300 and 10-22, 17-85, 28-135

    Type of photography:   Outdoor



    Reviews 1 - 5 (7 Reviews Total) | Next 15

    Review Options:  Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating

    Holiday Gift Guide 2013

    Check out our holiday gift suggestions for these categories!



    See All Holiday Gift Guide coverage - Click Here »

     

    PhotographyReview Videos

     

    PhotographyReview on Facebook