Review 4 of 20
Price Paid:
$480.00
from online Summary: I bought this lens because I've seen many good reviews and very good pictures taken with it. I also saw some bad reviews, but I thought I can't be that unlucky to get a bad copy.
Well, I was that unlucky. It had bad front-focus, it was extremely soft on the top-right corner too and even from day one I noticed some dust particles inside it.
Fortunately the shop that sold it to me (online shop) is replacing it with a Canon 17-40 L F4 and I am paying the difference. I'm not willing to go over several lenses just to find a good copy, so I'm betting on Canon L glass this time.
All in all, this isn't a lens you want to order online. Be sure you test it before paying for it, or check the return policy of the shop. Strengths: - F2.8, but if you aren't lucky enough to get a good one, it will be soft at 2.8
- good focal range
- relatively small and easy for- macro, even if it isn't true macro (1:1). It's just 1:3 magnification.
- polarizing filter can be used since focusing doesn't rotate the front element
- the build is pretty good, it feels solid; the zoom ring feel comfortable in using too; the finish gives it a classier look
- even with all the problems I mentioned, at smaller apertures it produced good images; for as long as the subject was in DOF it worked pretty well Weaknesses: - Sigma has bad QC, especially with this model it seems (heard other users complaining about it)
- bad front-focus
- top-right corner very soft
- AF behaves erratically especially in low light, but it might be because the above problems
- AF isn't HSM, thus it's a bit noisier and slower
- Focus ring moves while using AF
- Focus ring has a very small rotation angle, making it impossible to use Manuel focus
- if you want manual focus, you need to switch to it Similar Products Used: Canon 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 (Canon 400D kit lens) Customer Service: Extremely bad service in Romania: there is a dealer but they won't help you unless you bought the lens from them; International Warranty has no meaning here it seems.
|