Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Lenses:  35mm Zoom:
AF80-210mm f/4.5-5.6

Sample Images
More Products from Tamron
Link to this page

Tamron AF80-210mm f/4.5-5.6


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

John Rambo

( Intermediate)

Review Date
August 23, 2005

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 12

Price Paid:  $62.00 from eBay

Summary:

It feels as cheap as it is. Very light and fragile. Perhaps ideal, if you want to "travel lightly". Autofocus is very slow and sometimes inaccurate, especially in low light. Autofocus is also quite loud. Pictures are quite sharp, which was a bit of a surprise for a product this cheap. Unfortunately it has the tendency of adding chromatic aberration to the pictures.. Some might be able to live with that, but it really bugs me! Aperture minumum of 4.5 - 5.6 requires plenty of light, especially at the far end of the zoom. I hav not tested the lens for distortions, but for this price.. who cares :D If you want a really good telephoto lens, go for the Canon Canon EF 70–200 mm F 4 L USM. It ain't cheap, but there is no such thing as a cheap and good lens.

Strengths:

Price. Won't wreck anyones budget. Light. Easy to carry with. Average picture quality for the price.

Weaknesses:

Only average quality.. Very fragile. Slow and noisy AF. Dark.

Similar Products Used:

Sigma's and Canon's similiar zooms.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

Levon5

( Expert)

Review Date
September 20, 2004

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
1 to 3 months

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 12

Price Paid:  $60.00 from B&H

Summary:

I actually got the Kodak badged version of this Tamron lens. I tested it against a new Sigma 180mm F3.5 APO and the Sigma won but not by as much as you'd think when the Kodak/Tamron was stopped down. The Sigma's pretty sharp wide open @F3.5 and this lens' aperture is at F5.6 wide open near 210mm. Stop it down 2 stops and it's good.

Strengths:

Good quality photo taker at reasonable price. Light. Ideal for backpacking when combined w/a small wide angle. If you want light & inexpensive this is a good buy. I would use a tripod or a steady rest though because it is a slow lens.

Weaknesses:

Weak/light build quality-fragile if dropped, focus ring small and at front of lens, focus throw is too quick for manual focus in order to speed up its slow autofocus, searches a little, small f-stop opening makes for dim viewing even when shooting wide open when light levels are low. Should be fine in daylight conditions.

Similar Products Used:

Sigma 70-300mm APO, Nikkor 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 (makes a great macro w/6T and flash but I do not like it as a regular zoom lens), Tamron 70-210mm F3.8-4 (great build quality for the $-good quality glass that adapts w/different t-mounts).

Customer Service:

Not needed. I think B&H got a lot of these from Disneyland and marked them down for a quick sale. I guess I'd have to get the "Mouse" on the phone to get anything done if it ever did break down! Anyway it worked out well for me!



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

Dziku

( Intermediate)

Review Date
March 24, 2004

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
1 to 3 months

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 12

Price Paid:  $80.00 from ebay

Summary:

Cheap zoom. And because it's cheap it's fully plastic, motors are loud and AF is slow. Poor at 210mm and 80mm but in the middle when apreture is set at 8.0 or more its sharp.

Strengths:

cheap lightweight quite sharp

Weaknesses:

slow loud cheap dark



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: keggius
 (Beginner)

Review Date
August 1, 2002

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 12

Price Paid:  $95.00 from Adorama

Summary:

I am very pleased with the performance for the money of this lens. I have shot aerial photos, portraits and action photos of my horses with sharp results. The build seems a little weak but I'm not planning on using it to hammer in tent stakes. For the money, this lens is better than I expected.

Strengths:

Sharpness Value

Weaknesses:

Build quality Slow (but what do you expect for less than $100)

Similar Products Used:

Sigma 28-80 Tamron 200-400 Nikon 28-80

Customer Service:

Not needed



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: glennaa11
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
January 10, 2002

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
1 to 3 months

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 12

Price Paid:  $99.00 from Tristatecamera.com

Summary:

I recently bought my first SLR and this is the first extra lens I bought. I paid $99 and got a $15 rebate bringing total cost to $85! The lens has performed great for me. I used it over the holidays to do some sports photography at a soccer tournament. The vast majority of the photos came out very clear and sharp. Some shots were bad, but I don''t know that I would blame that on the lens... I think the autofocus had a little trouble choosing what to focus on sometimes. Depth of field is pretty much exactly what I wanted with the action in clear focus and the background blurred. I am very pleased with this lens, but find that I need a little more "reach" so I will probably spring soon for a zoom that goes to 300mm. For the money I paid this lens is a real bargain.

Strengths:

Light Cheap Sharp photos

Weaknesses:

none that I have encountered

Similar Products Used:

None



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>
 
More Review Content
More Reviews & Related Pages
 
Latest Reviews >>
Latest Products >>
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Camera Accessory Pro Reviews >>
Manufacturer Review Pages >>
Buyers Guides >>
Digital Camera Review Categories >>
Lens Review Categories >>
Reviews Index >>
Camera Review Archives >>
Digital Camera Sample Photos >>
Photography & Camera Forums >>
Write A Review >>
 
 
News
Latest Digital Camera & Photography News.
 

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda