Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Lenses:  Medium Format:
Arsat 250mm f/3.5

Sample Images
More Products from Kiev
Link to this page

Kiev Arsat 250mm f/3.5


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

sfpeter

( Intermediate)

Review Date
June 22, 2009

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
4.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 3

Price Paid:  $120.00 from Ebay

Summary:

This lens can be seen as either an Arsat or a Jupiter 36B. I believe the difference is Arsat is the export name and Jupiter (sometimes Yupiter) is the Russian market name. (Mine's is a Jupiter.)

It's a big, heavy lens intended for Russian medium format cameras like the Kiev 88 and Kiev 60. My particular example came with a Pentacon Six mount and I used an adapter to fit it onto my D700 Nikon.

It's full manual and doesn't apologize for it.

As with all Russian lenses/cameras quality control is all over the place. In my case I have a good but not great sample, but beauty is largely in the eye of the beholder.

Strengths:

For people who do old school photography it's right up their alley, and can turn in very good results when stopped down slightly.

Is cheap for what it it is, and they are often sold with carrying cases and filters.

Weaknesses:

It looks more like a laser cannon than a lens (it's that big) so don't expect to be discreet with it, and use a tripod for best results.

As I'm using it on a Nikon that was never intended for a lens like this the metering is a complete guessing game, although dialing in the settings in the camera's manual lens menu sometimes gives "close enough" results.

If it breaks or needs service you may have trouble, once when taking the adapter off a set screw came loose and the lens assembly unscrewed in the middle. I wanted it fixed rather than use it like that, and eventually found a dealer in Kiev who repaired it for me. Yes, I shipped it there and back.

Similar Products Used:

Tair-33, Arsat 80-200mm, Kalemar(?) 100mm

Customer Service:

It was a dealer I found online, not the manufacturer of the lens, but service was timely and good on price, most of the cost was in the shipping.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

napchop

( Professional)

Review Date
February 10, 2007

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 3

Price Paid:  $80.00 from Kiev, Arsenal factor

Summary:

This is the Jupiter 36b renamed Arsat in recent years but otherwise unchanged. It is a superb lens for the price although its weight is crippling if you're lugging a selection of arsenal lenses around for the day.
It is very sharp, with good contrast and I sometimes use it with an adapter on my Zenit TTL, with excellent results.
I have had some badly assembled lenses from Arsenal factory, but this was fine and needed no adjustments. Recomended.
The Kiev 60 & its lenses are an excelent introduction to system medium format photography. I'm no beginner but i use this camera, and the Salyut-S a lot.

Strengths:

Cheap and excelent quality.
comes with sunhood and 3 filters in a leather case.

Weaknesses:

Heavey
no tripod mount on lens

Similar Products Used:

All the Kiev 60 and Pentacon 6 lenses

Customer Service:

Arsenal gives good service and cheap. I don't know about dealers abroad.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Eddie G
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
October 25, 2002

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 3

Price Paid:  $100.00 from eBay

Summary:

Finding a used one in a good shape is hard, but if you find one, get it. Images are sharp and contrasty. A bit on the heavy side with no tripod support, but I managed to hold it and the camera up on a piece of wood attached to my tripod - problem solved! It has a reversing built-in screwmount shade. Not bad, but mounting filters on it is a bit difficult as the aluminum or brass filters don't interact well with the metal hood and sometimes get stuck. I use this lens with an Arsat 2x converter and an adaptor hooked onto my Canon A1 more often than I do my Sigma 400/4.5 APO lens.

Strengths:

- Sharp lens - With adapters you can mount it on a lot of MF and tons of 35mm cameras - Clever case/hood design making it compact

Weaknesses:

- Heavy - 82mm filter ring - Hard to find a good one used - NO tripod mount - Aparture blades could be a bit more uniform

Similar Products Used:

Zeiss Jena 180/2.8 MF Sigma APO 400/5.6 35mm format Canon 600/4.0 L 35mm format Hartblei mirror 500/5.6 MF



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
<< Prev 5 Reviews |
 
More Review Content
More Reviews & Related Pages
 
Latest Reviews >>
Latest Products >>
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Camera Accessory Pro Reviews >>
Manufacturer Review Pages >>
Buyers Guides >>
Digital Camera Review Categories >>
Lens Review Categories >>
Reviews Index >>
Camera Review Archives >>
Digital Camera Sample Photos >>
Photography & Camera Forums >>
Write A Review >>
 
 
News
Latest Digital Camera & Photography News.
 

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda