Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (12 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Rose
a CasualDate Reviewed: October 8, 2009
Strengths: noneWeaknesses: listed aboveBottom Line: This paper does NOT work well with my HP printer...i havent had this problem with any other paper but then ink does not seem to stick to this paper...it prints with bad quality and the ink smears on this paper...Do NOT buy it. In my opinon, Kodak is excelent for film not digital prints.
Duration Product Used: 6-10 years
Price Paid:
$16.00
Purchased At: Office Depot
Similar Products Used: HP Photo Paper - Great
Epson - Great (but my printer doesn't like to print boarderless for some reason with this paper?? but it prints okay
Kirkland brand - Great
Type of photography: People
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
burdickr
a ProfessionalDate Reviewed: April 12, 2008
Strengths: Fine looking temporary printsWeaknesses: Melting & degrading seems like a proble.Bottom Line: Dear Kodak.
I have had interesting experiences with your Ultima and Premium papers recently.
I am printing from Epson R1800 & R2500 printers on Tabloid size.
I am readying prints for a show and am wanting to mount on a heavy backing.
Hear is what I have discovered:
Your paper melts and wrinkles at 200º in a dry mount press:
The ink lifted off of the print to the press backing board:
Spray mount worked for 24 hours and then failed causing a big wrinkle in the center of the print.
I guess I have to wonder what your paper is good for as it is too thick for the toilet.
Sincerely.
Rob Burdick, Visual Arts Department, Grand Rapids Community College
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Price Paid:
$31.00
Purchased At: ??
Similar Products Used: Epson, Ilford, Canon
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
East Coast Joe
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: May 8, 2004
Strengths: Smooth color; satin finish; availabilityWeaknesses: All previously mentioned.Bottom Line: I agree with most of the negative comments other users have about the product; and while I wouldn't recomend purchasing this stuff, it does have its charms for those who might be stuck with a pack.
I tried the Kodak Premium Picture Paper Satin as Canon only makes matte and (very) glossy paper. I thought that the inbetween finish might be nice.
I own a Canon i960 and my experiences with Canon paper were great; no fiddling and perfect pictures. When I tried the Kodak paper I got terrible results until I went to the Kodak website and tried their settings. Pictures were better but not great. When I tried the Kodak settings plus subtracting some black from the prints (through the Canon print driver), I got great results. They still weren't as good as the Canon but I did feel as if I had salvaged the pack.
For Canon users who can't fit the 4x6.5" paper in the 4x6 sheet feeder, I have learned that the lid to the sheet feeder does not need to be close in order to operate; simply leave the lid open and turn the knob to use the paper. Not using the sheet feeder was a definite minus for this paper.
Overall this paper isn't woth the money or the fiddling. On the other hand after some fiddling the color was very nice and very smooth; the images are crisp but not as sharp as the Canon paper. If this stuff were HALF of the price, I would certainly consider it. As things stand now, the Kodak Premium Satin 4x6.5 paper is about $ .25@ vs. Canon Photo Paper Plus-Glossy 4x6 at about $ .15@. No contest as I see it. But hey - don't let the stuff you have go to waste.
Duration Product Used: 21+ years
Price Paid:
$20.00
Purchased At: Staples
Similar Products Used: HP papers; Canon papers; card stock (surprisingly good)
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Wolfgang Schulze
a IntermediateDate Reviewed: October 30, 2003
Strengths: None.Weaknesses: Surface of resulting prints is not glossy at all. Looking at it from the side, you can see it looks like embossed. Colors do not blend well, photo looks overly crisp.
Using the original Canon Paper, the same printer produces professional photo quality. With this Kodak paper, the same pictures look like cheap stuff. I will not use Kodak paper again.Bottom Line: Used it on the new CANON i860 with original ink cartridges. First negative surprise: although package indicates 4x6, the actual size is 4x6.5. As a result, the flap of the sheet feeder does not close properly. You will have to cut the sheets to make them fit in.
Duration Product Used: 2-5 years
Price Paid:
$15.00
Purchased At: COSTCO
Similar Products Used: Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy
Type of photography: Other
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
R Campbell
a Intermediate
from AustraliaDate Reviewed: August 30, 2003
Strengths: Cheaper then Canon paper.Weaknesses: Slow drying, slow to print on as you need to change your default print settings to geta good printBottom Line: Purchased a 50 pack of satin and gloss Kodak premium paper thinking it's Kodak so it must be good. The boxes say it works with all printers Canon included, I have an i850. The quality using the printer default settings is shocking. To get a decent quality I had to download some free software from Kodak. I certainly won't be buying any more Kodak paper once I've used this up.
Duration Product Used: 2-5 years
Price Paid:
$15.00
Purchased At: Software City
Similar Products Used: Canon photo plus glossy, pro and high resolution
Type of photography: Outdoor
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (12 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |