Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Manufacturers:  Canon:  Flashes:
Speedlite 220EX

More Products from Canon
Link to this page

Canon Speedlite 220EX


Featured Merchants


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: Me
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
March 30, 2003

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.75 of 5,
8 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 6

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:

I'll Start off and say I use this flash with a Canon EOS IX, APS SLR camera. The advantages of this flash are that it is relatively compact, has fast recycle times due to Canon opting to use 4 instead of 2 AA batteries, and it supports HSS (high speed sycning of flash). Unfortunately it isn't as powerful as I would like it to be for the price tag. Could also benefit from an accessory to allow it to cover a 24mm lense and not just a 28mm lense, but that would probably render it all but useless because it wouldn't have much power at all. Also, the flash exposure is less than consistent. Many times it overexposes and says the exposure was fine. Other times it says it has enough range but the flash is too weak in truth. I would call this more of the snapshooters flash, and if used in conjunction with a 550Ex or 420Ex being bounced of a ceiling/wall it would probably work well as a frontal fill flash, to prevent underexposed eyesockets. I give it three stars for both ratings because it isn't the worst, but far from the best.

Strengths:

1. Fast recycle time. 2. High Speed Syncing (but this the case with all Canon EX flash units and newer "Type A" bodies) 3. Light weight 4. Compact 5. Flash exposure lock, a Canon flash system feature, is nice and helps with horrible exposures.

Weaknesses:

1. Needs more power 2. Exposure with Canon's system is less than stellar, even worse when manual focused. Usually overexposes. 3. Too pricey if you ask me 4. Could use bounce/swivel if it had more power

Similar Products Used:

Quantaray QB 350 A, a thyristor sensor type flash that costs but $40 and has the same power as the 220EX, but also bounces

Customer Service:

Not needed, yet.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: RickV
 (Casual)

Review Date
November 18, 2002

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
2.75 of 5,
4 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 6

Price Paid:  $80.00 from ebay

Summary:

An excellent, small flash unit that always delivers on the money exposure. Quick recycle time is very helpful. I also have a 380 EX and the 220EX is ready for 2nd flash in half the time. If you have a Rebel (as I do) this flash will improve your flash pictures over the pop-up exponentially. I imagine it will do same for other Canons with pop-up. It's small and can be easily fit in a back pocket or in the accessory pocket of a small camera case. I got this after I already had the 380 EX because I found that I didn't want to carry around the 380, it was just a bit too big. The exposure is every bit as good under 30 feet away. It doesn't zoom so its range is more limited. It doesn't have a bounce head, but that's why it is so small. I still use the 380 a lot, but tend to carry the 220 if I'm out for a casual day not dedicated to shooting, but just carrying the camera. Also, it is capable of high speed flash for fill flash. All around, an excellent flash. If you are not satisfied with your pop-up flash results and don't want to carry a large "jointed" flash, get the 220EX. Unfortunately, it's very expensive new and used is no great bargain either. If the size and weight is not an issue, go with the 420EX, it has bounce and side bounce (fun!!).

Strengths:

Small Lightweight Accurate, accurate, accurate Capable of high speed flash. Fast recycle time.

Weaknesses:

Expensive, expensive, expensive. I would give it a 5 rating if not for the price.

Similar Products Used:

Canon 380EX

Customer Service:

Never used for the flash, but have used it for my Rebel. They are more responsive to direct customer interaction than through a service center. They said no to CS Center, then yes to me. Go figure.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: SwimPhoto15
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
March 25, 2002

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
1.50 of 5,
2 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 6

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:

Hmmm....what can I say about this flash? It is lightweight (would be lighter if it used only two AA''s not four but that would probably mean less flashes), Compact, prevents redeye to some degree with its higher height from the lens, great technology inside.

Strengths:

When evaluating a flash''s performance you have to look at the camera body it is mounted on''s performance when dealing with TTL Flash systems. That is why I give the entire Canon Flash system an A+++++++++ for its dead on flash exposures. The fact that you have Full auto flash, manual flash output if you change flash exposure compensation or ISO rating of the film, High speed flash syncing, And a good assortment of other features is incredible in a system so simply operated such as this one.

Weaknesses:

Power is more than a little weak at times! A little expensive if you ask me!

Similar Products Used:

nada. zip. zilch.

Customer Service:

never needed.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: T. S. Ng
 (Casual)

Review Date
December 30, 2000

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
3.60 of 5,
5 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 6

Price Paid:  $60.00 from Hong Kong

Summary:

I hate the 380EX for not being able to swirl, the 550EX is way too expensive for my purpose (maybe the 420EX would strike a good balance). I long for a smaller package with all the new features (E-TTL, FP etc) that I could keep in my camera bag for fill flash (so it doesn't have to be powerful, but high-sync speed counts). I found mine used in perfect condition for $60 with a little bit of bargaining. Notwithstanding so it would still score high in the value rating.

Strengths:

Small, portable, E-TTL & FP Flash that complement my 50QD (Elan II) and EOS300 (Rebel 2000)

Weaknesses:

None if you know it power limit

Similar Products Used:

380EX

Customer Service:

Haven't try yet.



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Steve Lutz
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
July 11, 2000

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5,
4 votes

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 6

Model Reviewed:
Speedlite 220EX

Summary:

I bought this because of its portability (it easiliy fits in my pocket), and because the lens I use on my Elan II will block the pop-flash with the lens hood on. Another main reason is that it is an E-TTL flash, which my 200E is not. I have used in now for awhile, and it fulfills its intended function admirably. I.e. fill flash in sunlight situations, short range "people" candids at parties, etc. indoors. I have to make sure that I use the zoom lens at a above 35 mm or the flash won't cover the full scene. The E-TTL function works well, and I have gotten some extremely good flash photos with this speedlite. The main downside to this device is its price. It is too expensive when compared to the 380EX. However, if you need/want a flash small enough to carry in your pocket, has E-TTL and is strong enough to cover most shooting situations, this is the only choice. I bought it and I don't regret it.

Strengths:

Small, light and has E-TTL for full integration with the Elan II and other Type A EOS camera.

Weaknesses:

Limited range, no zoom head. It is too expensive.

Similar Products Used:

200E, 380EX, 540EZ

Customer Service:

Not used



Buy

Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>
 
More Review Content
More Reviews & Related Pages
 
Latest Reviews >>
Latest Products >>
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Camera Accessory Pro Reviews >>
Manufacturer Review Pages >>
Buyers Guides >>
Digital Camera Review Categories >>
Lens Review Categories >>
Reviews Index >>
Camera Review Archives >>
Digital Camera Sample Photos >>
Photography & Camera Forums >>
Write A Review >>
 
 
News
Latest Digital Camera & Photography News.
 

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda