Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Manufacturers:  Konica Minolta:  Black and White Film:
Infrared 750 Black & White

Sample Images
More Products from Konica Minolta
Link to this page

Konica Minolta Infrared 750 Black & White


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

stOOpidgErL

( Intermediate)

Review Date
November 1, 2004

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5,
2 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 7

Price Paid:  $4.00 from B&H

Summary:

I didn't care too much for this film.

Strengths:

Price is right... can be loaded in subdued light- no changing bag, etc frequired to load /unload.

Weaknesses:

Hard to process, most negatives were hard to print, development times listed on box were not helpful [I was processing in HC-110 developer].

Similar Products Used:

Ilford SFX

Customer Service:

NOne needed



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

S.W.D

( Intermediate)

Review Date
May 7, 2004

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.33 of 5,
3 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 7

Price Paid:  $0.00 from Yodobashi Camera

Summary:

Good film if you learn how to work it. Development time is the main problem area, the Japanese packaging sugests D76 1:1 at 13 min while the english website says a lot less. I have found that 35mm and 120 seem to be quite different. According to the staff at Yodobashi Osaka this film is produced once a year and this is the last time that it will be made. No other infra red film is sold in 120 in Japan. Better buy up if you can.

Strengths:

Nice clarity and image sharpness. Can load in partial light without fogging

Weaknesses:

The 35mm only comes in 24. Shame it is not sold in reels.

Similar Products Used:

kodak HIE, ilford SFX



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Mike Klemmer
 (Expert)

Review Date
September 17, 2002

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
2 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 7

Price Paid:  $6.00 from B&H

Summary:

This film is capable of creating some of the most spectacular B&W photography, but it is very tricky to get the right exposure. The latitude of this film is very narrow. Bracketing is essential. A little too much exposure and all of the highlights are blown out, not enough and it is too dark. The 'IR' effect (white foliage) of this film is not as strong as Kodak HIE, but it is more so than Macrophot and MUCH more so than Ilford SFX 200. With Konica 750nm you don't have the halo and grain effect like you do with HIE, so this film is capable of taking much sharper images but it also doesn't have as much of that surreal look like HIE. You cannot rate IR film speed without specifying which IR filter, so let me say that in full sun (May - Sep) I've had the best results rating the film at ISO 6 +/- 1 stop bracketing with an R72 filter. Any other time of year and all bets are off for getting the right exposure.

Strengths:

If you want dramatic B&W landscapes with the 'IR' effect then this is your film. When it's on, ho boy, it ON! This is great stuff! If you want dramatic landscapes without the 'IR' effect and all of the bracketing, try using Kodak TMAX 100 with a Red 25A filter.

Weaknesses:

Slow, narrow latitude. There can be a high 'tear your hair out' factor at the beginning. Heavy bracketing means you get few good shots per roll, which is expensive. It's difficult to find development tables for this film. I use XTOL 1+1 7.5 min. at 20 deg C. Rumours are that Konica may be discontinuing this film.

Similar Products Used:

Kodak HIE, Macrophot, Ilford SFX 200

Customer Service:

N/A



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Terrence Town
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
August 14, 2001

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 7

Price Paid:  $5.00

Summary:

Pretty darn cool stuff. As far as the "classic" IR look, use a dark red filter on a fairly bright day out-of-doors. I usually rate at 50 ASA for this type of shooting (especially landscapes where there are shadows), with brackets at 25 and 100. Don't be afraid to open the aperature an additional stop if there is a lot of shadow in the shot. Push more than 100 and it gets pretty grainy. Otherwise, it produces a high contrast image with small grain. With a #25 red filter, you can get some nice stuff... puffy white clouds surrounded by black sky and white-highlighted foliage. I guess as far as dramatic IR effects, it is a good compromise, less dramatic than HIE but more dramatic than Ilford's offering (SFX). Also middle of the road as far as handling, falling again in-between the other two-- load and unload in low light, use a good light-tight metal-body camera. Much more predicatbale results than HIE... a great IR-like film to experiment with.

Strengths:

Pretty predicatble results for an Infrared B+W.
Much more exposure forgiving than Kodak's HIE.
Pretty easy to handle... much easier than Kodak's HIE, but still more finicky than Ilford's SFX.

Weaknesses:

Push it more than 2 stops and hello grain!
Not as dramatic as Kodak's HIE.
Slow, slow, slow (I rate at <= 25 ASA).

Similar Products Used:

Standard B+W like Tri-X, Ilford HP line, Ilford Delta 400, slide film including Ektachrome and Kodachrome.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: David N. VanMeter
 (Intermediate)

Review Date
July 6, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 7

Summary:

I have enjoyed this film immensely. I don't find it to be too contrasty and can print it easily on Multigrade paper with a 1/2 contrast filter. As for metering I use the cameras meter reading through a 25 Red filter and it works fine.

Strengths:

Less danger of fogging
Easy to use

Weaknesses:

Hard to get
Doesn't push worth a hoot.

Similar Products Used:

Maco 120

Customer Service:

NA



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>
 
More Review Content
More Reviews & Related Pages
 
Latest Reviews >>
Latest Products >>
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Camera Accessory Pro Reviews >>
Manufacturer Review Pages >>
Buyers Guides >>
Digital Camera Review Categories >>
Lens Review Categories >>
Reviews Index >>
Camera Review Archives >>
Digital Camera Sample Photos >>
Photography & Camera Forums >>
Write A Review >>
 
 
News
Latest Digital Camera & Photography News.
 

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda