Home | Login | Register
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Manufacturers:  Nikon:  35mm Zoom:
80-200mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S Zoom-Nikkor

Sample Images
More Products from Nikon
Link to this page

Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S Zoom-Nikkor


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

kay Shumway

( Intermediate)

Review Date
November 29, 2007

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
Less than 1 month

Visitors rate this review
2.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 39

Price Paid:  $914.00 from B&H

Summary:

This 80-200 lens is the best I have used yet. I take a lot of photos in low light and 2.8 is just what I needed. I have been using a kenko 2x teleconverter at times with the lens. the pictures are sharp and colors are great. It requires a tripod most oif the time though with 2.8 the shutter speed is faster than with my 70-300 at 4.5. I am very happy with this lens.

Strengths:

Able to get good results in low light
Sharp at all distances
I am so happy that I bought this lens with a teleconverter I have sidestepped buying a 5000 dollar lens for my nature photographs.

Weaknesses:

HEAVY none other than that It is worth it's weight in gold. I love it It will be my main lens from now on. Great portrait lens



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

vande17941

( Professional)

Review Date
August 28, 2005

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
1 to 3 months

Visitors rate this review
4.18 of 5,
11 votes

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 39

Price Paid:  $1200.00 from used

Summary:

This is one of Nikon's better-built lenses in the last 10 years. It's heavy, focuses quickly, and offers a large 2.8 aperture. Images are generally sharp throughout the range, but contrast and sharpness do suffer at 200mm at the 2.8 setting. There is serious light falloff toward the corners at 2.8 that isn't gone until the lens is stopped down to f8 even on a reduced-frame DX digital body. Stopping down one stop to f4 is a big improvement in sharpness and contrast, though. Flare and ghosting is evident in major doses with this lens. So, shoot with the hood, and not directly into a light source. Its performance is extremely close to the 70-200 VR G 2.8, which also loses a bit of contrast and sharpness wideopen. The VR version beats it, however, when it comes to light falloff in the corners. The two lenses have similar performance. However, this version lacks the VR which may or may not be important, depending upon your subject. I have found no advantage of one lens over the other, except for the VR function. The lens is compatible with TC-14/17/20e teleconverters models I and II. Be advised that the lens must be stopped down or the results are less than steller. At 200mm with the TC-14e, the user must use a max aperture setting of f4 (resulting in a 5.6 actual aperture) or images lose sharpness and contrast. Stopping down is even more of a necessity with the tc-17/20e teleconverters. This lens cannot match the 300mm f4 AF-S sharpness/contrast when used with a teleconverter. So, don't think you will be able to replace your 300mm. The tripod collar on the 80-200mm is garbage. It is too flexible for use in the 1/2-1/60 range. For use on a monopod while shooting sports, the tripod collar catches when switching from horizontal to vertical shots. This makes it a pain to move the camera smoothly in an action situation. Therefore, figure in the cost of a replacement collar from a third-party vender for smoother, vibration free operation.

Strengths:

Good build quality. Extremely fast autofocus. Silent autofocus. Smooth operation of controls. Image quality excellent at f5.6 Image quality good at f4 Image quality above average at f2.8

Weaknesses:

Sharpness reduced at f2.8 Contrast reduced at f2.8 Serious light falloff at f2.8 Terrible tripod collar >collar is vibration prone >collar is not smooth when changing from horiz to vert

Similar Products Used:

70-200 VR G 2.8

Customer Service:

Nikon customer service.... >wait on hold for an hour >wait a few weeks for a response >open your mail and hope that your lens is fixed



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

mtbbrian

( Expert)

Review Date
December 1, 2004

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
1 to 3 months

Visitors rate this review
3.67 of 5,
3 votes

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 39

Price Paid:  $940.00 from EBay

Summary:

I love this lens. It focuses FAST! It is sharp great to work with. It is a little enwielding, but learn to handle it after a while. I would becommend this lens to anyone who shoots sports. As mentioned in other reviews, take off(but keep) the tripod collar.

Strengths:

Fast Focus, Sharp

Weaknesses:

Heavy

Similar Products Used:

80-200 AF-D, 180 ED-I AF, 70-200 AF- VR....



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Tangochips
 (Professional)

Review Date
December 27, 2003

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
4.75 of 5,
4 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 39

Price Paid:  $1250.00 from Private

Summary:

This is the second time around that I have purchased this lens and for what reason? Well, I have been using the 80-200 AF-D Prior to ths and th AF- is just simply faster - smoother and quieter, there is less lag and focussing jolt thus the images are sharper. For my photo-journalsitic wedding weddings this is a bread & butter lens and I won't even start to compare its charectaristics and proprites to a prime lens as the latter would never suffice unless it is a AF 85/1.4 or 14mm/16mm prime. So there you have it...however, could this be the end of my reviwe woithout any critique, afterall, of course not ! This lens is heavy and is not as well balanced on my F100 as the AF-D. It actually feels twice as heavy and way off balance compared to the prior 80-200 AF-D...but considering performance and optics, its worth the sacrifice. Still, this is the prime lens which should be permanently attached to one of your Nikon bodies!

Strengths:

Optics, built, optics, built, sharpness, fast autofocus, very quiet, little focus jolt & feedback.

Weaknesses:

Heavy and off balance feel when attached to smaller F-100. Large tripod collar is in the way when not shooting with tripod - for Pete's sake; TAKE THAT THING OFF (collar) AND KEEP IT IN YOUR BAG!!!

Similar Products Used:

80-200 /2.8 Nikkor AF-D

Customer Service:

none needed



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: Dale Preston
 (Professional)

Review Date
February 15, 2003

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5,
12 votes

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 39

Price Paid:  $0.00 from Vistek

Summary:

Awesome lens

Strengths:

Fast, sharp, great feel and well built

Weaknesses:

none

Customer Service:

not needed



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2008 PMA Tradeshow
Camera News:
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda