Review 3 of 3
Price Paid:
$0.00
from Adorama Summary: This is my first attempt at this. So, please bear with me.
The K200D is my first digital camera.
I shot many rolls of 35mm with a Yashica AF230 I bought to chronical my daughters growth. I have some great shots and a lot junk and some plain old snapshots. So I guess I'm pretty much normal. (Not a chance...LOL)
When I retired, I decided to get back into photography.
I looked into the Nikon D60 and the Canon XSi. I read many reviews and adds for both of these cameras and found them both kind of limiting. IE: no braketing on the D60. So I checked out the D80 and found it's cost out of reach.
In the case of the XSi. I found it's perfomance to look very good. But at the the same time I would be paying for options I would find little use for. IE: So many frames per second I might as well get a video camera and the ability to control it from a computer. Just couldn't see myself trying to drag around a laptop just to get a picture. Plus the cost of lenses for both of these cameras was VERY high.
At this point I took a look at the Pentax K20D. A rugged high performance piece of equipment, but once again beyond my budget.
So I set my sights on the K200D.
The conclusions of every review was this. Yes it has some limits. IE: FPS a bit slow and no instant preview. But a great bargain in terms of bang for the buck, along with the best kit kens available.
So I looked into lens costs and found Pentax to be the most reasonable out there, plus I could use any K mount and with a little more work, even the old screw mount lenses. A this point I was sold.
I bought it from Adorama with the 18-55 kit lens for around $500 with a $100 rebate and my Wife bought me the much maligned Pentax 75-300 lens for a retirement present.
So here is my impression of K200D, after a few months use.
A fine piece of equipment.
After getting used to the controls, I've taken some pretty impressive shots with it.
Yes even with the 75-300.
Plus I've had some fun on Fleabay.
A Sigma 28-80 macro for $25, that works fine in it's middle range, though a find the macro setting to be a hassle.........The kit lens will focus as close without the macro switch and is sharper to boot.
A Tamron 35-90 macro......Macro??? fegettaboutit. But it only cost me $20 and it too works fine and sharp in it's mid ranges of zoom and appreture.
A Sears KR mount 135 macro AE with manual focus.....I over paid at $75.
It's quit sharp with good contrast, but it's 3 range macro function gives a rather quirky halo effect that I haven't figured out to take advantage of just yet.
Side story: I got it stuck on my camera the first time I tried to mount it, but a trip to the auto part store for a .060 shim let me get it off. I had to take the back of it apart to remove the offending Ricoh pin. So let that be a lesson.
I just picked up a Sigma 70 macro for $400, also from Adorama. My first top flight prime......:)
So as you can see. reasonable lenses are available that won't break the budget. Although top of the line are available at a price still less than the big 2.
Ok then enough about lenses.
The camera is a pleasure to use. Most controls and settings are well placed. the camera feels solid in my hands and is well balanced no matter what lens is on it.
I love the 11 point AF as it allows me to compose a shot then pick my focus point. An option I'm just learning to use to full advantage.
White balance and custom image options have enough settings to keep me busy for a long time to come.
All in all. I have no regrets on buying this camera. Just suffering from a bit of K20 envy.
The 10.2mp sensor gives me enough latitude to crop without losing too much sharpness.
Strengths: Solid build. Felt better in my hands than the D60 or XSi.
Great lens collection. from Pentax and other manufacters. Some of which can be had for a song.
Nice kit lens.
Easy or complicated to use, depending on your pediliction.
Great camera to grow into.
Weaknesses: Could use a bigger RAM buffer, as I have found it's FPS to be a bit wanting. Similar Products Used: None Customer Service: Haven't needed it
|