Home | Login | Register
10 Years of PhotographyREVIEW.com!
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Manufacturers:  Sigma:  35mm SLRs:
SA-9 QD

Sample Images
More Products from Sigma
Link to this page

Sigma SA-9 QD


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

gundamzaku

( Casual)

Review Date
July 26, 2008

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 1

Price Paid:  $499.00 from B&H

Summary:

i bought this camera in a kit which came with a 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 lens, a 70-300mm f/4-5.6 lens, and a sigma camera bag. that is why the price is so high. i did a comparison on the B&H webite of the SA9QD with the Nikon N65 and their performance is similar, so i got the sigma because of the price point. i already have nikon gear also, so i figure i would try something different. the autofocus is extremely slow, but that could be because i don't have any nice glass to go with the camera. low lighting and night shots are impossible without a tripod. i later bought a sigma 28mm f/1.8 lens and the autofocus sped up a bit, but not by much. so at this point i conclude that the autofocus is really slow. the mirror flapping noise is extremely loud as well. it's a loud "clacking" sound that makes you feel that the next shot you take will break the shutter. however, it is very user friendly. very simple to learn on and to use. my prints came out decent, but i have only used regular consumer films and haven't tried any slides, so the image quality part of the review is not conclusive. you should buy it if you're just picking up photography as a hobby, it does gives you everything you need to get started. definitely a no-no for weddings or sports, but most people have switched to digital. i only use it for portraits and landscapes where time is not restricted. i usually take it with me on vacations because not too many people know about Sigma products, and it's a lot lighter than my nikon gear.

Strengths:

great price point, ultra lightweight, user friendly

Weaknesses:

slow autofocus, not really usable in low lighting nor nighttime without tripod

Similar Products Used:

nikon F6, nikon D50, nikon FE

Customer Service:

never needed them.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
 
More Review Content
More Reviews & Related Pages
 
Latest Reviews >>
Latest Products >>
Digital Camera Pro Reviews >>
Camera Accessory Pro Reviews >>
Manufacturer Review Pages >>
Buyers Guides >>
Digital Camera Review Categories >>
Lens Review Categories >>
Reviews Index >>
Camera Review Archives >>
Digital Camera Sample Photos >>
Photography & Camera Forums >>
Write A Review >>
 
 
News
Latest Digital Camera & Photography News.
 

Latest Pro Reviews:
Camera News:
2009 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2009 PMA Coverage
March 3-5
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2009 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda