1. High quality, warm images better for people shots

2. Optional viewfinder grid lines

3. Programmable configuration

4. Built-in eyepiece diopter adjustment

5. Hot Shoe and PC external flash connections

6. Multiple exposure feature (2 to 10 images on one frame)

7. Uses CompactFlash memory cards (allowed me to use the same cards I was using in my previous digitals)

8. Crop Factor of 1.5x is good for telephoto lenses

9. Noise reduction setting suited for capturing the detail needed for astrophotography

10. Bracketing feature easy to use

11. Image histogram useful for analyzing exposure

12. Works well with my Nikon PB-4 bellows unit

13. Mirror-up feature useful for reducing mirror vibration

14. Exposure Delay Mode useful for reducing mirror vibration

15. Self-timer useful for reducing camera shake

16. Ability to lock certain features

17. Ability to use an intervalometer to fire the camera remotely

1. Crop Factor of 1.5x is not good for normal and wide-angle lenses

2. 95% viewfinder coverage instead of 100%

3. Fixed viewfinder (need waist-level finder & sports finder)

4. Fixed view screen (need better screen for manual focusing)

5. Battery dependence

6. No true mirror lockup, however, mirror-up feature very useful

7. No provision to attach standard cable release

8. Not possible to use Exposure Delay Mode and Self-timer at the same time

9. Difficult to manually focus in dim light

10. Unable to turn off viewfinder display (need it off for astrophotography)

11. Unable to save setup configuration in a user-defined custom setting

A few years ago I went into a camera store with a Nikon lens, a CompactFlash memory card, and a laptop computer. I took a used Fuji S5 off the shelf and a new Nikon D300 out of the box and took a few test shots (the store did not have a D200 or a D90 in stock). Both cameras performed well and felt good in my hands. However, I preferred the warmer images of the S5 to the cooler images of the D300. I walked out the store (after paying for it) with the S5.

This year I decided that since Fuji would never produce an S6, I would purchase a second S5. I am now shooting with two S5 bodies, two battery packs, and six NP-150 batteries.

Customer Service

I had to contact Fuji customer service on three occasions:

1. How to unlock parts of the menu that the previous owner had locked with a password.

2. Firmware upgrade questions

3. Compatibility questions about the use of AA batteries in the Nikon D200 battery pack.

They were very helpful and provided me with the information I needed.

Similar Products Used:

Fuji ST705 35mm SLR cameras

Fuji medium format film cameras

Nikon F, F2, F3, F4 35mm SLR cameras

Nikon EM 35mm SLR camera

Nikon N70/F70 35mm SLR cameras

image quality, body is solid as a rock, and handles very well

The small number of pixels limits the enlargement size a bit, the large RAW file size (24 MB), can eat up compact flash cards and HD space quickly, but that is small price to pay these days.

This is the first professional DSLR I ever purchased. And while it has it's short comings it still can produce very good portraits. It seems to do very well with skin tones and the images somewhat film like in appearance. It is hard to describe in words.

Being based on a Nikon D200 helps a lot, in my opinion, as the viewfinder is bright and better than a lot of the other APS-C viewfinders of the same generation as the S5. Plus the Fuji S5 is built in Japan, the D200 is not.

The only real drawback to this camera, outside of the 6 MP limitation, is the amount of time I have to spent in post processing to squeeze out the full dynamic range it captures in the RAW image files.

Don't get me wrong the final results is well worth it, but the time spent often leaves me wondering if there was a better way to achieve the same results.

For the price I paid for this S5 camera it does not represent a good value but if you can pick it up for less than $500, I think you would be a safe bet and good value.

If a S6 model came out today based on the D300S, with 12 MP instead of 6, I would buy if over a Canon 7D, without a second thought. But given the fact that the S5 is the last of the Fuji professional DSLR breed, I am in no hurry to sell it. Unless the Canon 5D mark II drops in price, at which point I am going to switch to Canon.


d2f

Customer Service

none

Similar Products Used:

none, there is nothing like a Fuji S5

Rugged build with weather sealed openings
12 stop dynamic range
great high ISO performance
film modes
JPG processing in camera

Discontinued model - could be a hassle should repair parts be needed
Slow - only 2-3 FPS in jpeg fine/ 1FPS in RAW
Not crazy about proprietary battery, but we'll see
Provided software is just short of horrible.

This camera is an upgrade from the Fuji S-2pro I've been shooting with for the past 14 months, and was purchased mainly based on it's excellent reputation and my prior experience with the S-2 and older Fujica film cameras. At the time I decided to upgrade, I discovered FujiFilm had discontinued production just 4 weeks earlier and consequently the few available went through the roof regarding price, or were being offered by highly disreputable dealers (like Broadway photo - famous for bait & switch tactics). I was elated to find this camera offered as an open box special with less than 100 shutter actuations for @ $800.

Preliminary results are highly impressive in high ISO and difficult dynamic range shots, and truthfully better than expected considering the fact that this is a 6mp sensor that interpolates the data up to a 12mp output. Color is absolutely fantastic, but this wasn't a surprise after shooting with the S-2. Sharpness has been mentioned as a downfall with the S-5, but the output files are sharper than the D200 produces with its 10mp sensor. It's not as sharp as Cannon's EOS 1Ds mkII (which I shot recently) but it doesn't come with a $5000 price tag either.

This is absolutely not a sports camera, if you're looking for high Frames Per Second (FPS) you'll be sorely disappointed. It's only moderately useful for wildlife as the autofocus is not the fastest available; but for street, fine art, studio, portrait, night photography, or especially weddings you will fall in love with this piece of equipment. The six film emulation modes are a very nice bonus as well.

Similar Products Used:

Fujifilm S-2pro
Nikon D-100
Nikon D-200
Cannon 40D
Pentax K-10

* Absolutely BEAUTIFUL skin tones
* Nikon D200 body (built like a tank + it's Weathersealed !)
* Compatibilty with Nikon lenses + accessories
* Film simulation modes for Provia/Velvia-like colors
* Great high ISO image quality (JPG)
* Non-CPU lenses metering, just like the D200
* Up to 400% of extended Dynamic Range
* A bargain if you are looking for image quality
* Suits people and wedding photographers really well

* Saturations other than people's skins are not that fancy (but can be corrected)
* Slower AF than Nikon D200
* Uses Fuji battery (not compatible with D200s)
* Effectively a 6mp camera, 12mp gives you soft pictures
* Playback mode is more difficult than in Nikon.
* Slow continuous shooting (3 fps JPG) / (1.5 fps RAW)
* Very slow buffering when using RAW !
* Too pricey if you are looking for an all-rounder and big megapixel camera
* Not too good Fuji Hyper Utiility software, and it's optional

Before using this S5 I was a little but worried of changing from my Nikon D80 to this rather unusual brand in DSLR. I know Fuji is an expert at films and analog cameras but to have something in this range from Fuji is a new experience for me.

But after somebody offered me to buy his used S5 and let me have a test with it, I immediately sold my D80 to that guy and add some more money for his S5 ^^.

Compared to the S5, my old D80 is a crap, the high ISO noise quality loses, and the skin tone, CF card compatibility, Non-CPU lens metering, and almost anything, basically. My fellow photographer friends were all confused when I decided to change to a brand that is unknown in their minds, but immediately dropped their jaws after I showed them the quality of the high ISO images, even at ISO 2000 ! The compatibility with Nikon's accessories, including the MB-D200 battery grip and Nikon's CLS Speedlite system justified the S5's quality. I am a wedding photographer as well and the colors and quality always pleases my customers. The skin tones are marvellous and the high DR is really useful. This S5 really suits me as a people photographer.

I wouldn't recommend it for sports though, because of it's slow AF and it'll get worse if you use RAW files as you can drink your coffee in the cafe while waiting for the CF card to write your continuous RAW images.

Customer Service

The FUJI customer service here in my country (Indonesia) is HELL.

Similar Products Used:

Nikon D80, Fujifilm Finepix S2 PRO, Nikon D1H

• Excellent build quality
• Exceptional low light High ISO performance
• Great metering system
• Large bright and informative viewfinder
• Outstanding dynamic range
• Fabulous Fuji Colours
• JPEG images are remarkable
• Fast start up time

• Not the Fastest Pro SLR
• LCd blacks out when writing to buffer
• Could do with finer resolution
• Needs extra battery grip and remote cord
• Raw File conversion a problem
• Large RAW file sizes
• Complicated menu system

I took delivery of a Fuji S5 Pro this July 07 to replace my aging S2pro,
I have been happy with Fuji service and image quality; so the additional dynamic range , low noise and much tougher body; put the S5 at the top of my shopping list.

Build quality
The first thing I noticed about the S5 was the build quality and weight which makes previous Fuji SLRs look like plastic toys by comparison. The quality feel is identical to the D200 which is closer to the D2X which is over twice the price. I like the LCD display and the Viewfinder is excellent . Again it feels more like a D2X with the large finder with matrix metering .

Handling
For a camera designed for Portrait photographers; the lack of the grip and 2nd shutter release as on the S3 is a retrograde step which make the camera even more expensive . The MB200 grip bought separately works well and the additional battery meters are an excellent feature.
Another thing which I had overlooked was the lack of screw in cable release; the Nikon lead being another unexpected expense.

Menu
The menu system took a while to get used to. It’s not very user friendly but I can live with it. If you are changing a function like density range frequently; this setting stays in the menu so when you switch on you can get to it immediately . Changing the self timer settings is annoyingly cumbersome.

Speed
It’s not a fast action camera. In practice the S5 is fast enough for my purposes in JPEG; I am not a speed demon and rarely need even 3 FPS . I can see the speed will upset a few people; but if you are taking serious sport; you wouldn’t buy an S5 anyway.
The blank LCD while writing the 25mb RAW files is a little frustrating especially if I am wanting to change any settings . I really didn’t expect that as I thought it would only affect preview . Using a faster CF card reduces the problem .

Flash
Images using the built in flash looked good with no exposure problems or burnout. This is a massive improvement then the old S2/S3 flash. I have not used an external flash as I have some questions over the compatibility of my old METZ 45

Metering and Focusing
Using Matrix system gives excellent result under most conditions. The new multi point focusing system is excellent with the selection of focus areas similar to ‘Nikons Flagship D2Xs . I have found the AF system to be a little slower that I would expect using AFS lenses.

About Face or Bust
I tried out Face Recognition in review mode; but when I took a photo of a female friend to demonstrate the wonder of technology; the enlargement zoomed to her bust and not her face!! I will have to read the instruction book more fully on that! It does work most of the time though.

First impressions on my first images.
I have to say I was not too impressed with my first images. I could see little difference from the images I’d taken on my S2which I have owned for 4 ½ years. This is more a reflection of the excellent quality the S2 delivers rather than any criticism of the S5.
Once I started to take photos in more difficult lighting conditions and using the extended density range, the results were remarkable; especially at High ISO settings 800 and above. Even at 1600 the DR prevented most burnout; the lack of image noise is quite remarkable.

I had a long session in intense bright sun, taking photos; of buildings and a number of shots in a dark market with sun filtering through lights in the roof. These are conditions which would leave lesser cameras struggling for headroom. The results with the S5 using JPEG are simply stunning . Highlight detail is very well controlled; with little or no loss of detail even in extreme conditions. Mixed indoor and outdoor lighting i.. e through windows had detail which would otherwise be lost in lesser cameras.

One does need to be very careful with the DR setting as if you use hi DR in low contrast lighting conditions the sensor gives flat looking images. A little adjustment to curves can easily correct this.

Camera a Software problem?
The Adobe Camera raw plug in for Photoshop CS2 doesn’t work properly . Adobe say it is for CS3 It reads S5 files; but the DR RAW s disappointing being less good than the JPEG files.

Conclusion
The Camera does deliver what Fuji claims. It has remarkable low light performance, a film like result which suits my personal style and exceptional exposure range.
It’s not the fastest camera in the world; but that is a minor detraction as the Image quality more than makes up for it.
Looking at the great JPEG result under hi contrast lighting; there seems little point in shooting RAW.

Customer Service

None yet but Fuji Service for previos product very good

Similar Products Used:

Fuji S2 Pro
Fuji S7000

Uses Nikon lens and other accessories. The body is well sealed and very sturdy. The different film settings you can apply and the dynamic range is excellent. The whites aren't blown out as some of the older cameras used to do.

Too slow. But it's not the type of camera you'd use for sports or anyother high speed activity your photographing. Purely for the portrait or wedding photographer, where you don't have to shoot too quick. However, it can give you up to 3 frames per second.

The Fuji S5 Pro is truly a beautiful camera. Though it has the body of the Nikon D-200 (also an excellent camera, of which I have also), it appears to have a much sturdier feel. With the MD-200 power grip, it makes it even more meatier (love it). The photos I took with it, on a beach with a couple, came out, fantastic! I used a Nikon 70-200 VR Zoom lens with it, and let me tell you, I was truly impressed. I look forward to using it for a couple of weddings I have coming up. Also, the film simulation settings appear to do just what the instructions say. I like that. The dynamic range is really good. I was going to purchase the Nikon D2x, but for what this camera can do, I think saving that extra $2000 is worth it. That's all I have to say for now. Peace all.

Customer Service

Good.

Similar Products Used:

Nikon D-200, D-100, D-70 and the D-80. I've also used the old Nikon F2, FM2, FE2 and N90s.

the extra Dynamic Range works - regardless in JPG or RAW formats. this is a lifesaver in tricky lightings.
colours - enough said abt fujifilm's Super-CCD by many other professional reviewers.
essentially a nikon d200 body - much tougher than the previous s2 and s3 polycarbonate bodies.
updated with iTTL and CLS-capable.
all accessories related to d200 (except batteries, see below) works with s5pro.
much faster CF card writing speeds than s2 or s3. highly recommend the use of sandisk extreme cards.
never need to shoot RAW again! the jpgs straight from camera are good enough for printing.

slightly slower AF - even though it is a d200 body.
terrible, terrible camera user interface. i miss the 4 soft option buttons from s2 and s3 which allowed quick changes.
fuji's hyper-utility software - the latest version, while an improvement over the earlier generations, is still cumbersome. not really needed unless you need to shoot tethered or need to process fuji's RAW files.
still a battery-sucker, like the d200. you'll need more batteries, if you are out shooting on extended periods. btw, d200's batteries will not work on s5pro.
FPS slightly slower than d200. then again, fuji DSLRs were never speed demons.

ahem... if nikon is reading this - THIS IS WHAT A NIKON CAMERA SHOULD BE! =P

sold my d50, and d200 just to fund this camera when it was launched in my country. i guess i won't go back to a pure-nikon DSLR any time soon unless some serious improvements are made to the image-quality from their sony-manufactured CCD. wake up nikon - it's not the amount of MP, but the quality of MP.

i've used the s2pro and s3pro before. while these 2 cameras were excellent, their quirkiness and the use of AA batteries (and CR123 in s2pro) quickly convinced me to drop them after a few months. the s5pro solved all these battery problems... and some!

however, this camera is not meant for general shooters. if you are into portraits and landscapes, this camera will leave you gasping for air when you see the excellent colours from the various film simulation modes. for fast-action photography (for example), it will also leave you gasping for air because the AF speed is a tad slower than the actual d200. that said, i've used this for event photography (i'm a Red Cross volunteer photographer) without much problems. once i've gotten the hang of the s5pro, compensating for the slightly slower AF is not a problem.

if you are willing to work with the slight quirks of fuji's DSLRs, the s5pro will reward you with excellent pictures.

Customer Service

none needed.

Similar Products Used:

d50, d100, d2h, d200, d70 - all nikon DSLRs
s2pro and s3pro.

- 5 color rendition options and superb color according to the situation.
- Details and definition especially in raw format.
- Compatible with current and old Ais lenses.
- A Fujifilm chip in a D200 body.
- Pictures taken at 800-1600 usable for prints up to 5*7.
- Good autofocus.
- Outstanding image combined with a Carl Zeiss ZF 1.4.
- Very accurate and natural flash exposure when used with the Nikon Flash SB 800.
- Reading/recording speed acceptable when used with Scan Disk Extreme 4 even in raw format.
- Very accurate exposure thanks to the same exposition system used in the Nikon F5.
- Accurate color rendition under different interior lighting system.
- Will satisfy 90% of the needs of the expert photographers.
- Portrait autofocus check is useful to check if the picture is sharp and well auto-focused.

- Shooting at high speed limited and about 50% slower than a D200.
- Resolution equivalent to a 9-9.5 Mo. digital camera when using shot at 12 Mo. at 100 iso.
- Resolution equivalent to a 8 Mo. when shot at higher ISO like 800 to 1600.
- About 40% more expensive than a D200.
- Size of the image (24-25 Mo. for a raw format picture).

I have been a long-time user of the Nikon F-system starting with Nikon FA. This is my first experience with a digital SLR. My last Nikon was a F-5 and I have been waiting for a camera with enough resolution and color characteristics that could beat what I had using film support. After a full two-week of tests, I am pretty satisfied. The camera offers a lot of color options and the definition/details is definitively enough to compete with any film solutions.

Customer Service

Not yet tested.

Similar Products Used:

Nikon F5 and FinePix F10.