Hasselblad 501CM Medium Format

Hasselblad 501CM Medium Format 

DESCRIPTION

The Hasselblad 501CM is a lightweight, compact, first-rate camera, available as a separate camera body, or as a complete kit. The camera kit offers an ideal opportunity for those photographers wishing to enter the Hasselblad system. The separate camera body is a useful item for committed Hasselblad photographers requiring an additional camera body.



USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-20 of 36  
[Mar 09, 2004]
SPG
Intermediate

Strength:

Quality of everything; the results it produces; the overall system; ease of use; reliability; user features; the CZ lens range and amazing optics.

Weakness:

Some accessories / components have a price that is hard to reconcile regardless of their quality.

There are two critical aspects to this remarkable camera: the sensational product design, enginbeering, quality and usability of it. Secondly what it does to your photography skills and creativity. The 510CM is simply sensational and brings you back to what photography is all about - composition and lighting. It enables you to do this with uncompromising quality. Together with Hasselblads' optics partner, Zeiss, the huge 6x6 negatives (and positives) are image perfection. That said, while equipment is only a means to an end, and taking photographs is what it is all about regardless of what we use, the 501CM actually brings you back to that. The 501CM is a lifetime investment that should not suffer from obsolescence or a fickled market-place. It will. as it has done before, retain value because there is nothing to really improve! The 501CM is a light-box and a remarkable one at that - mechanically superb and functionally intelligent. Using it (I have 50mm, 80mm and 180mm CZ lenses and A12 backs) draws you back to composition - square format seen through the superb 3D screen. With a non-metered finder (waist level or PM45) draws you back to understyanding light and there is no better way to do that than with a hand held meter. But it is also intuitive - the way the filmback works; the rear light curtain coupled to the shutter; the lens coupling; the compactness of the boody; gliding mirror system and mirror lock up; removable view finder; demountable overall construction - the list goes on and on. Every component and design element is superb. But above all the results are superior to anything else. While digital has everyone buzzing about the relative merits between 35mm film and digital - nothing does more for the art of photography than the "'blad". The lenses are magnificent and the benchmark for all others. The system is significant and comprehensive, but everything offered is by all comp;arisons expensive - but so too is the absolute best of anything! But you can start out simply - 510CM, CFI 80mm and A12 film back is all that's needed. So now I used my EOS 1V when a mnachine gun is needed and the 501CM when I have tiome to be creative.

Customer Service

None needed.

Similar Products Used:

Bronica SQA 10 years ago. Very good but the Hasselblad is more compact and intuitive.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Feb 03, 2004]
Sergio Guillen
Expert

Strength:

Excellent craftmanship Superb optics Reliable system Excellent resale value Very good used market

Weakness:

None

The model I have is the 500 C/M. At the time it was built, the 500 C/M was the flagship of Hasselblad. This camera is still the flagship of my camera equipment, which includes a Bronica RF645, a Nikon F100 and a Toyo field camera with Nikkor lenses. The camera is built with incredible precision and excellent craftsmanship. The color contrast and sharpness of the lenses are superb. (Remember, these are the reasons why the company has become so famous.) The 500 C/M operates under any condition. I have used it in subfreezing temperatures where other cameras would stop working, and in the California desert with heat and dust without any problem. I shoot most of my photos using a tripod, so ergonomics is not an issue. I also use a 45-degree prism that helps keep the image straight and keeps he snow and dust from getting on the focusing screen. I have the habit of always using a spot meter and/or an ambient light meter regardless of the camera system I am using. Therefore the fact that there is through-the-lens meter is not important to me. My perspective on the cost is different than the majority of the reviewers. First of all, all high-quality medium format cameras are expensive, so if you are into medium format, you will pay the price. Secondly, it is a camera you would keep for a lifetime, making the annual cost less than other systems that you would sell after a few years. Thirdly, there is a very good selection of used lenses and accessories worldwide. Another aspect is that since the camera is fully mechanical, there are not electronic components that could go wrong., lowering your maintenance cost. The resale value is also excellent. In every photography exhibit that I have had, there is always an enlargement from a transparency made with this camera. If I were to keep only one camera, the Hasselblad 500 C/M would be it.

Customer Service

Excellent. I had a new back with a minor problem: the "ready" indicator was stock in the red position. Sent it to Hasselblad and had it back in less than two weeks under warranty.

Similar Products Used:

Mamiya C-330, Bronica RF-645, Fuji 670, other formats

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 04, 2003]
neil
Intermediate

Strength:

Intuitive, basic photography for B&W in the classic mode:composition, aperature, shutter speed, film speed:thinking persons tool for great pictures; complete freedom from battery dependence[but get a hand held light meter].

Weakness:

Even in the second hand market, everything is a significant financial commitment. To get the most out of the Zeiss lenses, use a tripod. Consider the electronic prism view finder[PME-45] if you want more ease of transition from 35mm. Camera manuals not as helpful; much better to buy The Hasselblad Manual by Ernst Wildi, latest edition tells you everything about this camera system.

I bought this used, with the 80mm lens, A12 back; added a Polaroid back recently.After 3 decades of 35mm with an old Minolta[still have it], the move to medium format is wonderful. Huge negative, very sharp images, easy to crop.

Customer Service

Have not needed it. Excellent camera repair service available in my location, as recommended by friends who are pro.

Similar Products Used:

Minolta SRT 101 with 50mm1.4, 135mm 3.5; Fujipix S602Z digital; Contax G1 rangefinder with 35mm,45mm,90mm lenses.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Sep 26, 2003]
kommini
Intermediate

Strength:

Superb picture quality. Exceptionally well balanced piece of equipment inspite of its weight. Precision built.

Weakness:

Expensive accessories

I have had this camera for the last 3 weeks - what an experience ! Big defference between 35mm and MF. The W?L finder is clear and focusing is precise. The zeiss lens is unbelievably faithful in picture quality. While the infatuation and excitement of owning a hasselblad will wear off in about 10 or 15 years, the high quality of pictures will continue well into next 2 or 3 generations !

Customer Service

never needed

Similar Products Used:

Only 35mm...Nikons

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 21, 2003]
rjphoto
Expert

Strength:

Bigger negative sizes Sharp Zeiss lenses Lightweight, lighter than other brands of cameras for medium format Interchangeability with older and newer cameras as far as lenses, film backs, and accessories are concerned

Weakness:

High priced - though the kit is a better deal if one is just starting out with this system. I honestly believe the price isn't justifiable, though many would argue otherwise. I have seen many other bodies and zeiss items from other known cameras and manufacturers, 35mm and medium, and they aren't as steep. High maintenance and maintenance cost - Hasselblads are not cheap to repair. For the cost of replacing a back gate shutter, you might be better off just getting a used backup body on ebay for a couple of hundred dollars instead. Accessories - film backs seem to be very uncertain over time, ending up having problems with them

I had acquired the Hasselblad 501c kit through use of loans and at the student discount when I was a photo student in 1995. I used the loan also to get the 120mm F4 lens and I also received the free A-12 magazine through a promotion. The cameras take a while to get use to and feel foreign when starting out if one has always used 35mm equipment, but in time the camera becomes second nature to use. The lenses are top-notch and I have made many fine images with them. I do however have a few issues with the camera system, one being the body and of the film backs. I'm not sure how many people have had trouble occasionally with their own systems but I feel that I shouldn't have had the problems that had occured. After about almost two years my hasselblad had a problem, and that problem happened during an assignment I might add, the back shutter gate wouldn't retract to it's closed position and was in essence probably worn out. I hadn't used it as much nor have I ever treated any of my cameras with aggressiveness, always very ginger and careful. I always had taken care of my equipment. The school sent in my camera for repair at Cambridge's repair shop, where the school got their equipment from at the time. The Charge for this back shutter plate was 610.00!! This charge was included within my student loans. The same year the eyepiece in the waist level finder popped out, many students had this happen at the same time. From what I overheard by my instructor was that the plant that made the finders had to be recalled and the ones made to be detroyed; some defective batches of finders and every student, including myself, got a free replacement finder very quickly. After leaving school and a little ways down the road I process a roll of film and the frames on some of the rolls showed overlapping while others showed larger film rebate spacings. I had put this back away and I had the spare back and used this one instead. Now this back has a light leak problem. My conclusion: I am in no way trying to down this system, it is an excellent tool and is capable of delivering exceptional images when one knows their craft well, but for me situations haven't been ideal. There is no way I will be able to afford to get these items fixed. I'm on low-income and have no idea when my loans will ever get paid, if they do. I had taken time of from photography for way over a year now and just got back into it after some difficulty. I am not able to use my hassy without apparent defects showing. At least I have my K-1000 left to use, all not lost I guess.

Customer Service

Never used them. I don't have enough money to even try to get a ballpark estimate, won't even try it.

Similar Products Used:

Have used mamiya's and pentax 6X7's along with 4X5 in the commercial studio when I was a photo student, now it's just the pentax 35's

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
3
[Jan 09, 2003]
Oscar Urena
Professional

Strength:

Superb construction, and lenses. Kit well priced. Not a big camera, nor heavy. Very comfortable to handle.

Weakness:

Expensive line of lenses.

The 501 CM is a superb camera, and I give lots of credit to the construction and the Carl Zeis T* Lens = Outstanding image quality. I mostly shoot B&W Negatives and I develop and print my own negs and prints. The camera is very easy to work with, just follow your basic photography skills and you get what you want. I purchased the camera kit and bought a PME-90 Auto exposure prizm finder with it. This way I use it flawlessly. PME meters my scene in spot or average mode and I expose my negs accordingly. The camera mechanism is very reliable, without need of batteries. I love the system. E-Mail Oscarprophoto@yahoo.com

Customer Service

Have not experienced them.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 02, 2002]
David Azia
Expert

Strength:

The photographs produced with the 501CM and 80mm CFE are sharp and contrasty, and there is incredible detail in subjects photographed. There is a certain ‘smoothness’ that doesn’t exist in small format cameras. Considering the fact that the image area is much larger than on 35mm cameras, the camera is lightweight and relatively compact. The 501CM weighs about the same as the Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L lens. If you have the money, the range of accessories and lenses available is amazing. You can buy as many film backs as you need, and switch between different film types (and formats) without ever wasting any film. Luckily, there are many film backs on the used market for those of us who can’t afford new ones. Although a bit daunting at first, the 501CM is very simple in use – there are few features, you just set the aperture and shutter speed. I must admit though, I did read the manual before fiddling with the camera – it was so different from anything that I had used that I was a bit worried that I would break something. I found that loading film was a bit strange and awkward the first time round, but you soon get used to it. I love using the waist-level finder, it means

Weakness:

The 501CM kit is expensive enough. It’s a shame that the kit doesn’t include the lens-shade for the 80mm CFE lens. If there’s one thing that you should purchase, it is the lens-shade. It’s probably the single most important accessory that has a definite impact on image quality. This is the type of camera that should be used on a tripod to fully profit of the larger image area, which means carrying more weight. That shouldn’t change your habits if you’re into landscape photography. It will if you’re used to Leica Ms though. .

There comes a time when you need change, and I had decided that after sticking with 35mm cameras for five years I wanted to have a go at a larger film format. My first interest lied in the new economy Toyo 4x5, which offered large-format quality at a very decent price. However, I soon decided against purchasing a large format camera because of the need to buy plenty of film holders and the difficulty of finding a lab. I then considered buying the Mamiya 645E, but it lacked some of the features that attracted me to the Hasselblad 500 series: the waist level finder (as well as the possibility of changing viewfinders), interchangeable film backs, the 6x6 format, and the large second-hand market. Although I had never used a medium format camera prior to purchasing the 501CM, I decided that I might as well stick with Hasselblad – even though it is very expensive. I would rather pay a lot for a camera and know that it will keep its value if I ever decide to sell it. After using it for a few months, I am quite pleased with the photographs that I have taken with this camera. You cannot compare 35mm slides or negatives with their 6x6 equivalents. The rendition of details and colour are just far better, thanks mostly to the larger image area. When I first looked at medium format cameras I had imagined that film and processing would be far more expensive, but here in Switzerland it isn’t. If you use slide film, it costs even a little less than 35mm film. Do note that buying a Hasselblad is taking a big step, not only financially but also in the way you take photographs. The 501CM is not as flexible as a 35mm camera that can be used for nearly any type of photography. I would definitely not sell my 35mm equipment to purchase the Hasselblad (except for the odd unused lenses).

Customer Service

Although I have never had any problems with the camera, I have found that Leica Camera Switzerland (the official Hasselblad distributor in CH) is very efficient. Items that are in stock will usually a

Similar Products Used:

Unfortunately, only 35mm products: Canon EOS 3, 5, 500, 1n, D2000; Leica M4P, M6TTL; The Leica’s are probably the closest to the Hasselblad in terms of simplicity and cost. Both designs date back to t

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[May 25, 2002]
Chris
Professional

Strength:

Build Quality Simplicity Lenses Small Size Lightweight

Weakness:

None

This is an excellent camera that is rightly dubbed by Hasselblad as the last first camera you will buy. I got lucky and found a 501CM kit on ebay that was barely used. It came with an 80mm CB lens and A12 back and older 45 degree prism. I never used the prism so I sold it and got another A12 back. Considering the amount and quality of craftmanship that goes into each camera and lens, I think the this camera is worth every penny. Hasselblad quality is second to none. Every piece of accessory or part is of first rate quality. I have used other Japanese made medium format cameras and although they can provide similar results, they are not as well made. Some say Hasselblads jam a lot, I've never had one. Just make sure you the body/lens are cocked before attaching/detaching them and you should have no problems. The simplicity of the camera makes it very easy to use. No buttons or cryptic icons to deal with like Mamiyas have on their cameras. The quality of Zeiss lenses are simply outstanding. Sure Japanese lenses are sharp but I find Hasselblad lenses give a much more realistic contrast rendition. I find Japanese lenses are over saturated and too high contrast. Zeiss lenses are sharp and contrasty with beautiful midtones.

Customer Service

Excellent,in Canada and Sweden

Similar Products Used:

Mamiya 645 Pro, RB67, Mamiya 6, Bronica SQAi

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 09, 2000]
Peter Pecci
Model Reviewed: 5010-CM Black Body

Strength:

You can count on it working in all type of weather and tempeture conditions.

Weakness:

None

The end reults of images is second to none. The lack of battery power is a plus. The camera does not break down. It also lets your customers know you are very serious about your craft.

Customer Service

Excellent

Similar Products Used:

Pentex 645 and 645N

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 23, 2000]
Paul Snowdon
Intermediate
Model Reviewed: 5010-CM Black Body

Strength:

The optics on this camera system are super! The camera has a nice weight to it, such that it feels "right" in the hand. Also, it has interchangeable backs, so that you can switch from color to B&W while you are taking your pictures. Large number of lenses available.

Weakness:

The image in the view finder is flipped left to right, which takes a little getting used to. This can be overcome by getting a prism, which will correct the image's position so that it matches what you are seeing. The cost of the Hasselblad camera/lenses/gear is expensive, but not out of line with it's competition. However, you can be sure that the Hasselblad equipment in the future will work with your system, so you won't have to re-purchase anything.

For those wondering if medium format is worth it, it is! I've been continually amazed by the quality of my photographs since I jumped from 35mm to medium format. I DID pay alot more to make this jump, but the pictures have been super. The optics are fantastic, the larger negative allows much greater nuances in the B&W values, and the picture quality when you enlarge is second to none.

There are a number of reasons why I chose Hasselblad, and it was not an easy decision. My decision criteria were cost, portability, quality, feel and range of uses. Based on cost, I examined the Pentax. It had great reviews, a large amount of lenses, and was the cheapest of the bunch. I played with it at the camera store and found that it didn't feel right to me; it had a very SLR feel to it. However, it wasn't out of the running.

I then tried the Mamiya RZ-7, which was (at least in my mind) equivalent to the Hasselblad in terms of operation, quality, and range of uses. As soon as I picked it up, I knew this wasn't the camera for me. Boy, was it heavy. I couldn't imagine carrying this around all day; it was definately made for tripod and studio work.

I then tried the Mamiya 7 rangefinder. It is great! It is light, portable, has a wide variety of lenses. It would be absolutely perfect for travel photography.

It was a tough choice, but what won me over to the Hasselblad was the ability to switch backs (because I do shoot color and B&W), it had a nice, even feel in the hand, it wasn't too heavy (it was heavier than the Mamiya 7, but significantly lighter than the Mamiya RB-7), there are tons of lenses available, and financially speaking, it has held it's value over time.

The decision on cost became moot, when the decision came down to the Mamiya 7 kit and the Hasselblad 501CM kit, because they were both approximately the same.

Customer Service

Haven't required it.

Similar Products Used:

Mamiya RZ-7, Mamiya 7, Pentax 645.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 11-20 of 36  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com