Contax G2 Rangefinders
Contax G2 Rangefinders
[Sep 28, 2000]
ken younts
Intermediate
Strength:
light
Weakness:
focusing system learning curve not for the faint of heart. Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: slrs, both af and mf |
[Oct 10, 2000]
Dean Wilkey
Professional
Strength:
Many...see other reviews
Weakness:
One or two big ones After reading some of the reviews it looks like the G2 is a love it or hate it kind of camera. I would have to agree as I have hated it and loved it both. When I first bought it I was very excited to finally have a rangefinder that could replace my M3. I have always thought that the Leica M series was one of the best cameras ever made and I had great hopes that the G2 would take over where the M left off. Well, I must say that in many cases it did and in some cases it didn't. The handling of the G2 is very nice. Controls are easy to find and I have never had a problem with moving one by accident. I think that Contax did a great job in their selection of options and design. There are some problems of course. That blasted auto focus is a pain. I have owned my G2 for two and a half years now and I am finally feeling comfortable with the autofocus. That is way to long of a learning curve. So what did I do, I just bought a second one. I can't get any photos like it from any of the other cameras that I have used, and I work for an organization that has used Canon, Nikon, and many other products. This camera is a very specialized camera that is NOT for everyone, but if it fits your style and liking, you can't find another product like it. I still own a Leica M3 and don't plan on selling it but it is now sitting in my cabinet and I only use it once or twice a year. I still really like the Leica but the G2 is so much easier to use once you have mastered it. No easy task in itself. Similar Products Used: Leica M3 |
[Oct 26, 2000]
Andy Piper
Professional
Strength:
Lenses, speed of operaton, leigth weight
Weakness:
limited lens line, require batteries to shoot, smallish finder (although it's identical to old screw-mount leic finder in sizem and very clean (no lines) After 6 months I like the G2 more than after 2 months. The lenses match Leica’s best (except 35mm) and it’s much smaller and lighter than equivalent SLR’s, and a little lighter (and far faster to operate) than a Leica M. I’m getting better pictures because the camera gets out of my way and lets me concentrate on what I’m shooting instead of on dials and levers and LEDs and split images. Customer Service - took 7 weeks to get first G2 body's focusing fixed, but folks were very nice and informative (and after 7 week rememberd who I was!) Similar Products Used: Leica M2, M4-2, M4-P, M6 (at some time or other) |
[Oct 22, 2000]
Marvin C
Expert
Strength:
Too many to list
Weakness:
Mounting lens is a bit hard, read the manual very carefully to see where to hold the lens when mounting it. A great camera, but will test your photography skills. Customer Service Not needed Similar Products Used: Medium format rangefinders, Canon EOS A2 and its lenses |
[Nov 29, 2000]
Brian Robertson
Professional
Strength:
the feel of the camera, the fantastic lenses, ease of operation, the way the thing looks (all right, that doesn't make me shallow, does it?) and on and on.
Weakness:
I swear, sometimes the viewfinder just vanishes. Where'd it go? And although this may be my ignorance, it's a little frustrating to be able to lock in the focus on the shutter but not the meter. With quirky eyesite and a love of street photography and candids, I found the perfect companion. Customer Service haven't had to use it yet, thankfully. Similar Products Used: Similar? Rangefinders in the old days. |
[Jan 02, 2001]
Jamil
Intermediate
Strength:
Quality optics
Weakness:
I borrowed a friend's G2 and got perfect results...then I got my own and the light meter overexposes everything by about 1.5 stops...My three week old camera is being sent tomorrow for service This is a solid Camera. I borrowed my friends and shot 5 great rolls. The lenses are so contrasty! I then bought my own and the light meter didn't work overexposing everything and causeing my TLA200 to give the hottest spots I have ever seen! I am upset with this camera...I now have two broken cameras sent out! But from borrowing my friend's I know you can get superb results from this camera on your first roll. (If the camera has no manufactuer defects) Hand over your money and hope it works. Customer Service Sending it out tomorrow after only owning it for 3 weeks...light meter overexposes by 1.5 stops Similar Products Used: I shoot Nikon N70, F100 (which lost the ability to focus after only 4 months) and Mamiya 645 |
[Jan 18, 2001]
Marek Mezyk
Expert
Strength:
- Superb Optics
Weakness:
- Focusing is tricky in the beginning but it’s just a matter of patience. This camera requires a little getting used to but once you handle it for about 2 months you begin to truly appreciate it. There are some things I wish it had like spot metering but that will go for any piece of equipment and our expectations of being spoiled by the technology that is out there. Bottom line is that this camera is superbly built, has amazing optics, its small so you can take it anywhere. Customer Service Had not needed it yet. Similar Products Used: Nikon F5 |
[Mar 02, 2001]
Patrick McInerney
Professional
Strength:
Outsatanding lens quality, everything at your fingertips, light
Weakness:
Noisy AF, small viewfinder The G2 is an exceptionally well made camera, very light, with lovely handling. Similar Products Used: Leica M4-P |
[Mar 27, 2001]
Bruce Fields
Professional
Strength:
1. Watchlike build
Weakness:
AF is totally unreliable This camera invokes strong feelings from its users. The lens quality (and therefore the image quality) is truly remarkable rendering great sharpness, contrast and color saturation, edge to edge at all apertures (I used the three "standard" lenses). The feel is a true joy to experience and the controls impart confidence and fine workmanship. So why did I finally sell my system after trying to stay in love with it for as many years as it has been sold? Because no matter how carefully I read the manual I found too many situations where I was unable to take a photograph, losing the moment entirely, because the camera would not focus. A quick change to manual produced similar results. No focus. When the camera does not want to focus, it will not and therefore you will be prevented from taking your shot. After nearly getting myself killed by traffic on Rue Saint Germaine in Paris while I was unsuccessfully fidgeting with the G@ to try and make it focus on a shot which I lost anyway, I gave up and decided that beauty of design is insufficient if it doesn't do the job reliably. And the G2 didn't. Great shame, because I have taken some really incredible images with it. But when I want to shoot, I need to be able to without fear of losing the moment. I actually moved to an EOS3. Not as elegant, but remarkably fast and eminently reliable. And the optics are not at all shabby. When you need to rely on your tools, you have have to have reliable ones. Sorry Contax. Almost is an achievement, but not good enough for me. Customer Service None Required Similar Products Used: Leica M2 |
[Apr 10, 2001]
Steve Barnett
Expert
Strength:
Build quality
Weakness:
None so long as you treat it as a rangefinder and not as you would an AF SLR An excellent camera. Having always liked the rangefinder idea, and having unsucessfully tried M2's, this was a breath of fresh air. Needing to wear spectacles viewing through the viewfinder was a revelation. Focus as you would with any rangefinder (check where the AF is telling you its trying to focus, or use manual focus) and its as fast as a Leica. Common sense stuff that I think a lot of people miss who try to move from an AF SLR. Customer Service Not needed Similar Products Used: Leica M2 |