Hasselblad Xpan Body Rangefinders

Hasselblad Xpan Body Rangefinders 

DESCRIPTION

The Hasselblad XPan incorporates a dual-format facility providing a full panorama 24x65 mm format as well as a conventional 24x36 mm format on the same film. This innovative camera offers all the convenience and advantages of the 35 mm format, but provides the option to rapidly switch to the full panorama format, without changing film. It becomes, therefore, the first and only dual-format camera on the market that expands the format instead of masking it, ensuring that every exposure utilises the full area of the film. In addition, the 65 mm width of the full panorama images is similar to the medium format, ensuring that the Hasselblad XPan will always give you superb image quality.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-20 of 33  
[Dec 05, 2001]
polak187
Professional

Strength:

-small -solid -great meter -aperture priority -clear rangefinder window -will unwind the film and than put it back into the canister (good safety) -EV controls

Weakness:

-LACK OF SHUTTER SPEEDS IN THE VIEWFINDER (BAD, BAD, BAD) -slow lenses -shade on the 45mm fits over the cap so to remove the cap you have to remove shade first -hard to work pano/regular switch -slow lenses

I love panoramic photography, but I can''t afford ( and don''t want to carry) big medium format cameras such as Fuji 617 or Horseman. So the Xpan seemed like a right choice. It''s a great idea that wasn''t really executed in the right way. I belive that Hasseblad either intentionally left so much room for improvements to re-release new xpan in the future or they have no clue about compact rangefinders therefore they screwed this one up. But the bottom line is that the concept is great, camera is well made and the results are amazing. I''ve been using mine for about a year now and it''s just great. I wish there was at least one fast lens so I can apply the camera into nighttime candid photography since f/4 and above doesn''t really fit the job. I like the camera. But to all the people who are new to rangefinder/panorama market I would recommend renting it first before you buy it. Concept is little different and it may not fit you.

Customer Service

Well I didn''t had to deal with them yet and hopefully I won''t have to.

Similar Products Used:

Fuji 617

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Aug 16, 2000]
Henrik Rundgren
Expert

Strength:

Portability
Ease of use

Weakness:

Limited info in viewfinder

Got mine in NZ after I dropped my contax RTSII in the salty H2O. Got the center filter straight away and have had no problems with the dreaded vignetting (which occurs without centerfilter or if not stopped down to f8 w/o filter) ever since.
Pure photo pleasure! Got the 90 as well and it is also a splendid performer... ...only drawback is that is hard to get decent printing from the excellent negs/slides (Reala/Provia 100F) in Sweden. But soon I will have a neg mask delivered to my local pro lab so that´ll be the end of that I hope.

Customer Service

Dunno yet.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 26, 2000]
James Johnston
Professional
Model Reviewed: Xpan Body

Strength:

Great images, sharp,sharp,nice contrast. I use a center filter which evens out the exposures.This is my first range finder. It is easy to focus and feels great to hold,even the hand held images I have shot are tack sharp. I am excited about learning and taking advantage of the Xpans unique feaures

Weakness:

No double exposure, view finder info difficult to see in bright conditions.

I enjoy using the camera, the images are great. It is a first class addition. I look forward to purchasing the 30 mm.

Customer Service

I haven't had a problem.

Similar Products Used:

Fuji 6x17, Noblex

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 24, 2000]
Roger Gagnon
Expert
Model Reviewed: Xpan Body

Strength:

Excellent fit and finish. Very impressed with the 45 mm and 90 mm lenses; both are very sharp and contrasty. Bright viewfinder, easy to focus.

Weakness:

Cannot see shutter speed in viewfinder. The 30 mm lens is too expensive. They need to come out with a lens in the 135 mm range.

Excellent camera, well made. A lot of fun to use!

Customer Service

N/A

Similar Products Used:

My first panoramic camera. I also own Canon and Hasselblad (medium format) systems.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[May 12, 2000]
Chris Groenhout
Professional
Model Reviewed: Xpan Body

Strength:

Multiformat, quiet and gentle shutter mechanism, fine lenses, reliable (so far), fun and easy to use.

Weakness:

'B' shutter speed limited to 30 seconds or so - bummer! Can't be used with IR film due to IR film positioning. Viewfinder info is pretty basic. Falloff in 45mm lens (though I actually like it and so do my clients!). 30mm lens is JUST TOO EXPENSIVE!!!

The great thing about this camera is that it is enjoyable to use and hence encourages you to make photographs more often than with a 617 or similar camera. The quality of the format is more than sufficient for most uses and the lenses are excellent. Like most users I would like some refinements, but have done some of my best work on this camera and will continue to take it everywhere I go!

Customer Service

Ok - haven't had much need for it as it's easy to use and very reliable.

Similar Products Used:

Art Panorama 6x17, Fuji 6x17, Widelux F8.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Mar 06, 2000]
Jeff Vanuga
Model Reviewed: Xpan Body

Strength:

Excellent concept and idea of having a dual format camera. 35 mm and panoramic. Well built body and very solid. Excellent lens selection especially the new 30mm. Just ordered the 30mm and have not had one to analyze.
Interchangable lenses with film in the camera is big plus which makes the camera very versitile. Images are razor sharp.

Weakness:

30 second maximum shutter speed is a big mistake although I just had the camera serviced by hasselblad and they extended the time to 239 seconds. A big help and better than the original 30 second.
No mutiple exposures! Some how Hasselblad/Fuji missed the boat on both these issues.
Although I managed to work around some of these shortfalls, the viewfinder information sucks and is virtually impossible to read the viewfinder information in bright conditions. In addition, information such as shutter speed is located on the back of the camera which makes it necessary to take your eye away from the viewfinder to see shutter information. I thought we advanced further than this in todays technology.

Takes exceptional images but Hasselblad/Fuji missed the boat with shutter time restricted and mutliple exposures. Isn't this supposed to be a professional camera??? Viewfinder information is severly lacking especially in bright conditions(snow). Under these conditions you are unable to see any information at all in the viewfinder. I resolved this problem by covering the rangefinder with my hand to see the red exposure information or use my handheld meter and disregard the viewfinder information.
Besides these shortfalls, I am very happy with the system but feel it needs some refinements in the future.

Customer Service

Excellent. I had to return the camera due to a stuck rangefinder framing(when you change lenes in 45 or 90mm the framing adjusts). It was either a snowmachine ride or a drop that caused this. The camera was back in less than a week and had the timer changed to almost 300 seconds.Great customer service!

Similar Products Used:

Fuji GX617

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
4
[Sep 07, 2000]
Jonas Scott
Intermediate

Strength:

Great lenses
35/panorama formats, switchable, mid-roll.
Solid build
Good viewfinder
Easy to focus
Very nice light meter system - basic but dead on accurate.

Weakness:

Incredibly DUMB and awkward format switch
Too little viewfinder info
No slide shows

A delightful camera. Oddly enough I have been using this camera in panorama mode to take portraits with the 90mm lens. It gives an almost cinematic effect. Don't just use it for landscapes. I wish they had 135mm. The camera feels great in hand and is easy to use except for the incredibly dumb, stupid, clumsy god-awful, poorly designed format switch on the back of the camera. Whoever designed that piece should be shot - often! Other than that disaster the camera is a gem. And the photos are brilliant. I would have liked to see more info in the viewfinder but after looking into SLR viewfinders with a billion little bits of data in them, this is quite refreshing. Eye relief is not great and you have to get used to centering your eye just right. Focusing is wonderful and fun. And even handheld, you can get crisp sharp blowups - which is the main reason for not going with a medium format panorama camera. Will you ever use the 35mm frame? I hardly do. But that doesn't bother me. Nice to know it's there - especially with the 90mm lens. I hope Hasselblad doesn't give up on this camera and decides to offer more lenses (35, 135, 75). Haven't tried the 30mm lens. Too expensive. But also, no one ever has it in stock. Even B&H. By the way, Kameraleder makes a BEAUTIFUL ever- ready case for the Xpan - all top quality leather. Makes it even nicer to hold and shoot with. Check out there website. Bottom line: a great value and brilliant lenses. If you like panorama, buy it. But don't forget those head shots.

Customer Service

None needed - but Hasselblad has one of the best customer interface systems around. Very nice, helpfull people.

Similar Products Used:

Leica M6 "Classic"
Contax G1
Konica Hexar

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 03, 2000]
Dominic Collins
Expert

Strength:

The Hasselblad name was the greatest strength, along with (possibly) the 45 mm lens quality.

Weakness:

Other reviewers have noted the 30 sec. longest shutter speed, which could be a problem. But for me the main problems came when I realised how bad the handling was - stupid dials and buttons - too small and fidly.
Not enough information in the viewfinder - the focusing was tricky in most light conditions.
The quality of the shots really weren't that great - too much fall off towards the edge of the frame.

Good Bye and Good Ridence.
My advice would be a Pentax 67II and crop the image later on - better metering, easier to use, better lenses, better value for money, need I go on?
Got rid of it and the s/h prices reflect how poorly the camera is rated - and rightly so.
However, some people I am sure will love it, but PLEASE consider very carefuly and run some films through one before purchasing.

Customer Service

No experience but being a 'Blad I am sure it would have been good.

Similar Products Used:

Linhof 6 xc 17

OVERALL
RATING
2
VALUE
RATING
1
[Oct 26, 2000]
Richard Shaffer
Intermediate

Strength:

The physical size of this camera was one of the main selling points to me. I wanted a panoramic camera which I could take on trips overseas. Weight and size count when traveling by air today, the Xpan fits the bill in this respect.

Weakness:

As with others the lack of double exposure capabilities, and the limited bulb time. After calling the service dept I was told that the newer Xpans have been programed to give more time. Having just purchased mine a week ago I checked, and at this point seem to be getting about 4.5 minutes. Wish there was more.

Having the camera only a week I am still running some test rolls through it. What I see so far is great. I have the 45 & 90mm lenses and both seem very sharp. The real test will be an upcoming trip to Egypt.

Customer Service

Have only spoken to them, but they were very helpful about the bulb feature.

Similar Products Used:

Fuji GX617 w/105 & 300mm lenses

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Oct 29, 2000]
Steve Plattner
Expert

Strength:

Great color saturation, sharpness of all 3 lenses. Size. Manual focus.

Weakness:

Lack of shutter speed readout in viewfinder.
Panoramic/standard format switch. Meter is decent, but not great. Lack of 135mm lens or higher for telephoto work.

I have shot more than 100 rolls with my XPan, mostly in the Southwest, Crater Lake NP, and the summit of Mt. St. Helens. In terms of ease of use and portability, and lens quality (I have all 3 and they are extraordinarily sharp), it's ideal. I have sold my M6TTL, my F5 (great but a boat anchor), and would never go back to a G1 or G2 (spastic autofocus, even the G2).

Customer Service

Exceptionally good. My body had very soft, easily scratchable paint. Hasselblad readily offered to replace the bottom plate and film chamber door, no hesitation. Had camera back in 48 hrs. They were very nice and responsive.

Similar Products Used:

Contax G2
Contax G1
Leica M6TTL

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 11-20 of 33  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com