Kodak Black and White +400 Black and White Film
Kodak Black and White +400 Black and White Film
[Feb 19, 2000]
evan twidwell
Casual
Model Reviewed:
Black and White +400
Strength:
cheap and convenient. can be processed at any one hour lab.
Weakness:
i took a role of shots and they had a horrible greenish cast. the whole batch was ruined. convenient, a beginner may want to try it before using real B&W. I think you just need to find a good lab to process it. Customer Service none Similar Products Used: tri-x 400 |
[Aug 30, 2000]
Roger
Intermediate
Strength:
Can be processed at 1 hour lab. Lots of contrast, very sharp, little grain.
Weakness:
I bought two rolls of this film. I didn't use them both in one day. the first roll came out with the odd "color" tone to the images. The second one came out perfect (took it to a different lab) so I think it might be the fault of the lab and not the film. This film is very convieniant in that it can be dropped off with your color film. The problem with the greenish tone in the prints I think is the fault of the lab not the film. the first roll I shot had that green all over it in every exposure. However, I had it developed at the place I bought it (Target). The second roll I took to a specialty lab (Proex) the prints didn't have any tone other than true black and white. Similar Products Used: Conventional B+W, Tri-X, X-pan, Iford Delta |
[Feb 14, 2001]
Luigi de Guzman
Intermediate
Strength:
Fine grain for the speed, acceptable images in bright light.
Weakness:
ugly blue cast to prints Chromogenic film sucks. Similar Products Used: Real B&W films: |
[Feb 16, 2001]
Michael Kalugar
Intermediate
Strength:
Fine grain, can be taken to a one hour photo processer
Weakness:
green tint when printed on color paper, best printed on b&w If needed the film cna be developed with b&w chemicals (not a very good image though). I have encountered problems when I tried to print on color paper. Best results include C-41 proccessing and printing on b&w paper. Similar Products Used: none |
[Mar 27, 2001]
Richard Saylor
Expert
Strength:
Fine grain, good resolution, good tonality.
Weakness:
Some labs can't make decent prints from it. Excellent general purpose film. It is very convenient and inexpensive to get processed. If a particular lab does a bad job on prints, take the negatives elsewhere. If scanning a negative or print for web use, just greyscale it to get rid of any unwanted color cast. I have some 8x10 enlargements made by a pro lab which compare favorably to any 8x10 I have from conventional B/W films. Similar Products Used: Kodak T400CN, Tri-X, Plus-X, Tmax400 |
[Mar 27, 2001]
Kathy P.
Casual
Strength:
Can be processed at one hour lab, easy to find, good price
Weakness:
horrible red to magenta tint If you're just starting out and want to experiment with black and white you could use this, though I would recommend Tri-X. The color is just too awful for me to recommend this to someone serious about black and white photography. Customer Service none Similar Products Used: Tri-X, TMAX |
[Apr 02, 2001]
J K
Intermediate
Strength:
When taken to a lab which processes it properly, the resuluts are striking. Great contrast and fine grain without the added cost of having B&W developed.
Weakness:
Taking it to the wrong lab will give you a sci-fi colour scheme. Cheap, versatile film with the ease of C-41 Customer Service What am I going to do, get it serviced under warranty? Similar Products Used: Misc. true B&W film |
[Apr 28, 2001]
Adam Clark
Casual
Strength:
Beautiful B+W with the covenience of C-41 colour.
Weakness:
None to my eye. A great way to produce quality B+W prints. Similar Products Used: This was my first B+W film. |
[Aug 04, 2001]
Terrence Town
Intermediate
Strength:
1-hour-processing-- can get your prints back quickly and easily. Pretty forgiving film, enlarges without graininess.
Weakness:
Pretty "flat" film-- by that I mean it is very contrasty with little grain, giving it a very 2-D feel. Also, your prints can come out green or blue tinted. Not a big deal if you are going for enlargements. Well, I guess use of this film really depends on your needs. It is great for getting quick processing of your shots, to sort of test the waters. Also, you do get great contrast (I never use a medium red filter with it, sometimes use a medium yellow) and the grain is nearly invisible. Somehow, though, the 2-D flat images just don't compare to the depth of Tri-X or Ilford B+W films. Not very pushable, I rate at 400 or sometimes MAYBE 600 in low light. Predictable results. For fine art shots, I guess it is OK, but nothing to write home about, but then again the 1-hour-processing feature is great and that sometimes over-rides everything else. Just go to a good lab to get your proofs, and ask them to correct for green/blue if they are printing on color paper. Unlike some of the other reviews, I would not spend the extra to print it on B+W paper... if you want that use a true B+W film. Unlike Ilford's XP2, you won't get sepia, just green/blue tint if it is not color corrected. Give it a shot and see what you think! Customer Service Never had to use it, but their web site is great. Similar Products Used: Tri-X, Ilford HP line, Ilford Delta line, Ilford XP2, Kinica 750 IR. |
[Dec 07, 1999]
George Quiroga
Expert
Model Reviewed:
Black and White +400
Strength:
This film offers the best in convenience (1 hour labs can process it) with sharpness and good tonal range. I've used it to shoot flowers and plants with great success. The lab commented on how impressed they were with the sharpness. It also held the detail in the shadows. I had prints that had superb range from Zone 0 to 9.
Weakness:
A batch I had processed at a different lab had a green cast to the prints. I'm going to use this film for most of my black and white work. But I'm going to stick with the same 1-hour lab that gave me good results. Similar Products Used: None |