Kodak Gold Max 800 Print Film
Kodak Gold Max 800 Print Film
|
[Nov 24, 1999]
Ron Salazar
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
Good for general use.
Weakness:
Color contrast vary. Sharpness loss and grainy results (well, what do you expect from high speed film). 1. Recommend for low light situation. Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: Other Kodak product. |
|
[Nov 18, 1999]
Bruce Robinson
Expert
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
It is suitable only for extreme cases of low light - like a campfire.
Weakness:
Extremely contrasty and grainy. Kodak 400 is a much better film...Use the 800 only if absolutely necessary. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Kodak 400. |
|
[Oct 29, 1999]
Rob
Casual
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
I got a free roll. Nice colours.
Weakness:
Lack of sharpness, grain Unimpressed. Most pictures taken with tripod, though often looked blurry. Won't use again Customer Service - Similar Products Used: Many other speeds/makes, no other 800 |
|
[Sep 30, 1999]
j j
Expert
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
I don't.
Weakness:
Grain, saturation, some lattitude problems. Like the 200 and 400 versions of Gold (not Royal Gold) this film has no reason for existance. Just get the NHG2-800 from Fuji instead. I can't think of any reason other than that this film is dirt cheap and NHG2 isn't. Customer Service Why bother. Similar Products Used: NHG 800. |
|
[Sep 28, 1999]
T Deveyra
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
I don't like it...
Weakness:
This film is very grainy and finicky. The exposure has to be very exact. Kind of ironic for a faster film that supposedly should have a bigger lattitude. Even Popular Photography (Aug or Sep 99) issue had the same findings (and numerours complaints about it, which prompted the review). I would not bother with this film. Similar Products Used: Fuji, Kodak |
|
[Sep 27, 1999]
randy johnson
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
great speed !
Weakness:
none a great high speed film if exposed properly. as good as max 400...and it is very good. Customer Service not necessary Similar Products Used: max 400 |
|
[Aug 20, 1999]
Shane
Casual
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
readly avalable
Weakness:
not if you push it its a good print film.but i dont shoot it at the rated speed to often.it pushs pretty good tho. Customer Service never used it Similar Products Used: none |
|
[Aug 19, 1999]
Jose Riveras
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
i dont really like it
Weakness:
can you say grainy took a bunch of rolls on vacation- big mistake, got most of the shots, but you could see the grain for sure (adds mood sometimes, but not intended)- should've gotten 400 and just be more careful, especially with a zoom P&S Similar Products Used: non max 800 |
|
[Aug 14, 1999]
K. Dempsey
Casual
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
This film did extremely well in poor lighting as you find in many indoor sports events.
Weakness:
Photos did appear grainy. Expected a little better quality with action shots than I received. Would not use again until I try some other brands. Similar Products Used: . |
|
[Aug 03, 1999]
Karen Chichester
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
Gold Max ISO 800
Strength:
Good general purpose film when lighting might be an issue.
Weakness:
Prints are a little grainy, but its light range makes up for it. Doesn't seem to reproduce cool colors as accurately as Fuji. Not my first choice of film. I prefer Fuji Superia. But if I need an 800 speed film I get this one. Similar Products Used: Fuji Superia |