Olympus OM-Zuiko 16mm f3.5 35mm Primes

Olympus OM-Zuiko 16mm f3.5 35mm Primes 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-12 of 12  
[Aug 17, 1999]
Jan Steinman
Expert
Model Reviewed: OM-Zuiko 16mm f3.5

Strength:

I always thought fish-eyes were "gimmic" lenses, suitable only for wildly distorted images. Was I wrong! I got this as part of a used system I bought, and was going to sell it, but then I began using it. It conveys a wonderful sense of "being inside" the subject, especially up-close and personal. Avoid subjects with straight lines, and no one will even know it's a fish-eye. If you must include straight lines (horizon :-) run the most prominent line through the center, and it will remain straight. I also use it with the Olympus 7mm extension tube to "get inside" flowers. In such cases, be careful not to bump the front element on your subject!

Weakness:

Not specific to this lens, but proper exposure can be a pain with a fish-eye, as so much sky is included that it throws auto-exposure off and blocks up the shadows.

Small, light, and amazingly versatile if you don't abuse it's characteristics! In looking through my portfolio, I'm amazed at how often I use this "gimmic" lens.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Aug 17, 1999]
Warren Kato
Intermediate
Model Reviewed: OM-Zuiko 16mm f3.5

Strength:

A very sharp and contrasty lens. There is little edge falloff in sharpness or contrast. In addition it is very compact and has built in orange and yellow filters.

Weakness:

The special lens cap needs some additional friction to keep it on.

If you need a semi-fisheye, I don't see how you could do better.

Similar Products Used:

Sigma 16mm

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 11-12 of 12  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com