Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro 35mm Primes
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro 35mm Primes
USER REVIEWS
[May 27, 2001]
Grega Poljsak
Intermediate
Strength:
-solid construction
Weakness:
-not a constant aperture when focusing, but it doesn't matter if you have TTL metering This is a great lens. Don't let the price fool you, pictures are very sharp, sharpnes is comparable to my Nikon 50mm f1.8. Autofocus is good when used in general shooting and with limit switch on. When used in macro mode, you'll have to switch to manual focusing anyway, so it doesn't really matter that AF is slow and hunts at close ranges. What is a little odd here is switching between AF and MF. You have to switch two switches: the one on your camera, and another one on the lens(at least for Nikon users). The lens is pretty compact and really very well built. I like the focal length of 105mm because this makes this lense very usefull for macro photography, portrait photography and nature photography. Three lenses in one and it performs outstanding in all cases, except you might want to use a difusser when shooting portraits, as this lens is too d*** sharp! Can't be beaten regarding quality and/or price. Customer Service not needed Similar Products Used: None |
[May 25, 2001]
AL
Casual
Strength:
Fast, cheap, liteweight and handsome . Exceptionally sharp.
Weakness:
Noisy and tortoise like AF.The gold ring attracts unnecesssary attention. The AF is so slow and noisy. If you're trying to capture that bee hovering over the flower ,make sure somebody is available to sent you to the nearest emergency dept, you'll be swarmed by the whole nest in no time. I almost thought I bought a broken lens. My other Sigmas are not as noisy. Use the MF for sensitive subjects. Also great for portraits. Customer Service Not yet. Similar Products Used: Ist Macro lens. |
[May 24, 2001]
Joel Alves
Expert
Strength:
*Very sharp lens
Weakness:
*Slow and noisy AF I use my SIGMA like a portrait lens and backup to my amazing Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro USM that I use for Macro Dental Photo only. Customer Service - - - Similar Products Used: Canon 100mm f/2.8 macro USM, Vivitar 100mm f/3.5 macro, Yashica Dental Eye |
[May 24, 2001]
Kasinee Hemvichian
Casual
Strength:
Macro Capabities
Weakness:
Slow AF I thought about buying this lens a few years back. I was not sure until I read all these reviews, and I have to see for myself. I love the lens since the first time I tried using it. The first photograph I took from this lens came out so beautiful. I was amazed by the sharpness and the macro capabilities. The lens is perfect for both macro and portrait work. I could not be happier with the results. My friends know how much I love this lens. It's worth every penny. See for yourself. Customer Service No need at this point Similar Products Used: None |
[Jun 18, 2001]
Jon Mitchell
Beginner
Strength:
Sharp as a tack
Weakness:
As everyone else says, AF is a little slow but very functional I read all of the reviews on this site and decided I would purchase this lens because I wanted to start some macro photography. Although I am a beginner in photography, the first couple of rolls I exposed were absolutely amazing. The colors were awesome and the lens was the sharpest I have used. To see some of these photos, check my photo.net Macro folder at: http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=128256 Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: First Macro |
[Dec 14, 1999]
Scott
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
105mm f/2.8 EX Macro 1:1 Lens
Strength:
Extremely sharp, well-built, several hundred dollars less than Canon equivalent. Internal focus, with limit switch for AF use. EX finish has been very durable. My overall favorite lens.
Weakness:
Only thing about this lens I don't like is the sliding manual focus ring. I invariably forget to slide it back when switching from AF to MF... My favorite lens. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: None |
[Sep 30, 1999]
j j
Expert
Model Reviewed:
105mm f/2.8 EX Macro 1:1 Lens
Strength:
***SHARP*** Superlatives omitted but appropriate.
Weakness:
Focuses slower than yer gramma Very little difference, other than elegance of lens appearance (Nikon wins), and the price just doesn't compare. If one wanted to do macro auto-focus, and fancy automatic stuff with a macor, one might want the Nikon, but who does that with a macro? Customer Service Why? Similar Products Used: Nikon "Micro". |
[Aug 23, 1999]
Steve
Expert
Model Reviewed:
105mm f/2.8 EX Macro 1:1 Lens
Strength:
Extremely sharp at all apertures. Rugged, less expensive than Nikon, Canon etc.
Weakness:
None Awesome lens, great at macro and ordinary distances. Similar Products Used: None |
[Sep 04, 1999]
David Ramsay
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
105mm f/2.8 EX Macro 1:1 Lens
Strength:
This lens has excellent sharpness throughout. Solid build and great value.
Weakness:
None Buy it. This lens is a pleasure to use and a great value! Similar Products Used: None |