Things I like: -Distance to subject is better with the extra focal length, great for jewelry etc, keeps the reflection of lens smaller and less interference with lighting. -Stabilization is good -Sharpness is excellent What I do not like: -Minimum Aperture of f/22 is not enough to get great depth of field, it's OK but at this focal length of 180mm it would be nice to have f/32 or even more (most Sigma lenses seem to be limited to f/22 it seems, with Canon f/32 is standard) -Size and weight are a little much for hand held over long shoots, I do it anyway as that's how I am, hate tripods Overall I like having the lens to compliment my Canon 100 Macro, so far have only used it in the studio, perhaps it will be a great tool beyond that...

print stickers | sticker printing | printing services | business printing

Nightime portraits and close-ups* (In video mode)
Color cuts well with Zeiss Ze's

Needs a Rechip to work for still photos because any recent Canon body will say "Error Code xxxx" however, I did put some tape on the electronic contacts and was able to take stills with it, but that's not why I purchased it.

Also it's fairly heavy so be prepared, though it does have a tripod mount.

I purchased this older Sigma on a whim because I had a need for a good low light macro lens. Most users talk about the Nikon mount version, but I have one of the rarer Canon EOS models.

I didn't want to spend $1,500 for Canon's 180mm (which is actually slower at F/3.5) and since I just needed this for "filming" rather than "stills" I thought I'd give it a shot.

I'm pleased with the results. I've gotten some beautiful close ups for a music video of the lead girl turning the pages of a book and strumming her guitar.

I also used it at night in a subway station and it handled the low light plus the flares from street lights very well.

Now realize I haven't even thought about the Sigma Rechip because my only need at the moment is for video, but one bonus of this lens is that it seems to cut very well with my Zeisses (35mm & 50mm Planar ZE's)

Similar Products Used:

None - the only tele macro I've used.

* image quality
* build quality
* works on new digital bodies

* weight

The first thing you notice about the lens is that it has Sigma's black Zen finish. The Zen finish was intended to give a nice texture to the lens when holding it. And for the most part it succeeds. However, with the nice feel comes a price - it's hard to wipe clean and marks easily. The Zen finish grabs on to cleaning cloth every chance it gets making it hard to wip effectively. The Zen finish also marks due to the rubber used in the finish.

The second thing you notice is the weight (or mass) of the lens. This is a lens where you will need muscles to carry around. You have to remember that no-one said that glass is light. The build quality is excellent. I have the utmost confidence that I can use the lens to take out a would be burglar and be able to mount the lens on my D200 to take their picture.

How does it perform on a camera?

Well, it breaks down into a couple of categories:

* Viewfinder - being a f/2.8 lens, the viewfinder is bright and clear.

* Balance on Camera - on a Nikon D200, it's great. Good balance, and easy to hold. Just be careful with the focusing ring. Being a screwdriver lens, the focusing ring moves when the lens focuses. Therefore, you will need to keep your hands clear of the ring so that it can focus smoothly. Luckily, the lens is large enough for this to happen.

* Hand hold abililty - Normally, an 180mm lens would require a shutter speed of a least 1/180 of a second according to the rule of thumb. On a DSLR like the D200, you should require at least 1/270 of a second due to the smaller APS-C size sensor. Luckily, the size and the shape of the lens makes it every easy to hand hold. I was able to get acceptable results down to 1/80 of second.

* Image quality - the reason to buy the lens. It's sharp - not just in the center but corner to corner.

* Colour - Excellent. Looking at close ups, I did not see any CA.

* Flaring - may be there but I couldn't see any

Miscellaneous points:

a. 9 blade apperature for smooth boken
b. small tripod mount - not removeable
c. Metal lens hood that is threaded
d. Internal Focus - good for filters
e. slow focus - all macros are slow
f. 1:2 ratio


Conclusion

Being an older lens, lots of people out there assume that the performance of this lens is sub-par. But looking at the results, you will see that good glass is good glass regardless of when it was built. If you don't need 1:1 and you are looking for a bargin in the 180mm range, this is definitely recommended - especially if you can get it for a good price on Ebay.

Similar Products Used:

Nikon 105mm f/4 MF Macro
Nikon 60mm f/2.8 AF Macro

Beautifull solid build quality. Excellent optical performance.

Imcompabilty. I hate sigma USA''s simple answer and their lack of responsbility on the imcompabilty issue. Tokina can upgrade their discontinued lens(such as Tokian 100 f2.8 macro), why not sigma?

I hate to let this lens go. It is solid built(much more solid than any sigma current products). Nice optics. Beautiful lens made very sharp and contrasty pictures. But I have to let it go after I sold my last film EOS bodies. This lens doesn''t work on new EOS body, including my only left EOS D30 digital SLR. This lens was sent to sigma for upgrade, but it was sent back to me untouched. They can not upgrade this lens, that simple. Now I have to rely on my 70-200 f2.8 and 500D close up lens for similar macro performance. I have to say it is way worse than the sigma 180 f2.8. You can tell the difference even in the view finder.

Customer Service

A kind of controversy. Sometime you got prompt service, sometime it could take more than one month. In this case, I hate their lackness of responsiblity. Who knows if I am going to buy any more sigma

Similar Products Used:

70-200 f2.8 + 500D

Beautifull solid build quality. Excellent optical performance.

Imcompabilty. I hate sigma USA''s simple answer and their lack of responsbility on the imcompabilty issue. Tokina can upgrade their discontinued lens(such as Tokian 100 f2.8 macro), why not sigma?

I hate to let this lens go. It is solid built(much more solid than any sigma current products). Nice optics. Beautiful lens made very sharp and contrasty pictures. But I have to let it go after I sold my last film EOS bodies. This lens doesn''t work on new EOS body, including my only left EOS D30 digital SLR. This lens was sent to sigma for upgrade, but it was sent back to me untouched. They can not upgrade this lens, that simple. Now I have to rely on my 70-200 f2.8 and 500D close up lens for similar macro performance. I have to say it is way worse than the sigma 180 f2.8. You can tell the difference even in the view finder.

Customer Service

A kind of controversy. Sometime you got prompt service, sometime it could take more than one month. In this case, I hate their lackness of responsiblity. Who knows if I am going to buy any more sigma

Similar Products Used:

70-200 f2.8 + 500D

Super sharp and super fast apochromatic design professional telephoto lens, sharper than the Nikkor 180mm f2.8 I had before.

A bit heavy at 1350g and quite expensive at US $800.

The lens build quality and optics is definitely superior than the competition. Although this model is now discontinued it still is far more superior(and still costlier if you can find one used or brand new) than the Nikkor 180mm f2.8 and Sigma AF180mm f3.5 just released recently.

Customer Service

n/a

Similar Products Used:

Nikkor 180mm f2.8