Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4 Zoom-Nikkor 35mm Zoom
Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4 Zoom-Nikkor 35mm Zoom
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 26, 2001]
Park
Casual
Strength:
sharp and neutral image.
Weakness:
pretty slow AF speed Sometime it runs better than 35-70 2.8. Customer Service none Similar Products Used: none in this class |
[Feb 08, 2001]
Mike Gayle
Casual
Strength:
Sharrrrrp Lense
Weakness:
Slow AF Speed Good Lense. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: 35-70 1:2.8D |
[Feb 05, 2001]
Nick Nowak
Intermediate
Strength:
Very, very sharp edge to edge.
Weakness:
Larger and heavier than current lenses in this focal range. This may or may not be a flaw, dependong on your needs. I use this lens on an N80 and the focusing is very accurate and fast enough for my needs. I had no problem tracking cars at the ice race this last weekend. If you are considering some of the newer zooms that go out to 300, you may want to take a look at this lens instead. Although the range isn't as large, your pictures will be far sharper with this lens. If you need the extra 300mm, I have used this lens with a low budget (appr $40 used) Kenko 1.5x converter on my N80 and achieved very decent results (AF was quite slow, but metering still functioned and was spot on. Photos lost a small amount of clarity, but were evenly lit and distortion free from edge to edge). Basically, this zoom produces amazing results throughout it's range. The only lens that would be better is the 80-200/2.8, but that costs four times as much. At a price of $200-250 used, you just can not find a better performing lens in this focal range. BUY IT!!! Customer Service Called Nikon to order the user manual for this lens. Excellent service, received the manual in just a couple of days. Similar Products Used: Nikon AF50/1.8 |
[Apr 22, 2001]
Gerald Ling
Intermediate
Strength:
Sharp (Good optics)
Weakness:
Relatively slow AF I purchased this lens not too long ago and I am very pleased with it. I chose this lens over the 70-300 ED lens mainly due to its built, constant aperture, price and sharpness. It is heavier than the 70-300 ED but then again, its sturdiness makes up for that. I didn't bother about the extra 90mm that the 70-300 ED offered as images tend to be a bit soft in the 200-300 range. I have heard that the use of a tripod remedies this though. AF is a slower than most other lenses I have tried due to it's older design but it is very acceptable on my F100. Although it is slow focusing from macro to infinity, adjustments are just as fast as any other lens when the object is in focus, (not including the AF-S lenses). In my opinion, this is the best bet for people who cannot afford the 80-200 f/2.8. For this price, it is great. By the way, I got the HN-24 (screw-on) lens hood for it and it works great in blocking unwanted light. The lack of the 'D' chip is not a real concern for me as I use this lens outdoors and seldom use a fill-flash. Even when I did, exposure was great and accurate. I notice that the 'D' chip is only very useful when performing a fill-flash. Then again, I could be wrong. This lens performs very well for close-up pictures as well. One of the closest focusing lens in this range available. Customer Service I called Nikon recently regarding the option to program my F100 to leave the film leader out. Customer service was good and pleasant. Similar Products Used: Nikkor 28-105 AF |
[Jun 14, 2001]
Thong Ang Hui
Casual
Strength:
Hey, BTW my version is the Nikon Series E, which is optically the same as this AF zoomer.
Weakness:
heavy at almost 750 gram. hard to hand hold without some support ie a window grill or lamppost get the nikon series E 70-210 f/4.0 if you cant find the AF one. You lose metering though. Customer Service none Similar Products Used: the 70-200 f/4.5-4.6 manaul focus for the FM-10 and FE-10. This is too slow to MF easily. |
[Aug 10, 2001]
F L Au
Intermediate
Strength:
Constant aperture (an extremely rare characteristics for non-f2.8 zoom nowadays), sharpness, high contrast, good color saturation & balance, images have traditional 'Nikon' taste, solid construction (engineering plastics on outside only).
Weakness:
Impractical focussing ring. Old design by today's standard (e.g. rotating front element, could be shorter and lighter). Center of gravity shift when focussing and/or zooming (non-IF design), aggravated by the weight of the lens. This is a rare gem. It is a pity that Nikon did not make an updated version for it. Customer Service Never used. Similar Products Used: Tamron SP 70-210 f3.5; Nikon AIS 80-200 f4; |