Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX Aspherical HSM 35mm Zoom
Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX Aspherical HSM 35mm Zoom
USER REVIEWS
[May 29, 2001]
Francis Fukuyama
Expert
Strength:
the lens is very light and focuses quickly. 17mm is much more useful than many people realize
Weakness:
I have been consistently disappointed in the sharpness of this lens at all focal lengths, especially compared to the Nikon primes and zooms I've used Given the expense of the Nikon version of this lens, I'm happy to have a zoom of this range, but I don't understand earlier comments praising this lens' sharpness Similar Products Used: Nikon 80-200mm 2.8 AF |
[Jun 18, 2001]
Daniel Ruben
Casual
Strength:
price
Weakness:
82mm filter (expensive) if you want a wide zoom, this is it. amazing 104 degrees takes in whole room from corner. much better than all other off-brand equivalents, much cheaper than camera brand. faster than minolta Similar Products Used: None |
[Jul 04, 2001]
Bill Turner
Expert
Strength:
versatile, great focal range, fast for a zoom
Weakness:
poor performance with autozoom flash This is a great, versatile lens for landscapes and interior shots. I have shot over 100 rolls with this lens since I purchased it and have not been disappointed in any way. I highly recommend the lens. Customer Service not needed Similar Products Used: nothing similar |
[Jul 07, 2001]
jonathan
Casual
Strength:
lower price in this range of zoom lens
Weakness:
the focusing ring turns around during focusing it cannot be denied that it's one of affordable ultra-wide angle zoom lens with certain Customer Service i need it now Similar Products Used: none |
[Jul 21, 2001]
Bryan Agan
Casual
Strength:
Super wide angle
Weakness:
Big filters cost big $ Compared to the price of Canon's (and other's) comparable lens, you just can't beat it. I have experienced some distortion at the edges at the 17-19mm end, but this is normal for most zooms in this range. I recently used this lens on a vacation to the Grand Teton National Park, Yellowstone NP, and Arches NP to great effect. It captures so much more of the landscape than similar pictures from my traveling companions' 28 and 35 mm range lenses and the pictures are very, very sharp. I have good results with the filters I have used although they are relatively expensive because of their size. Although it's an AF, for some situations you may want to use it in MF mode as once it's focused in AF, you can't override it. Customer Service none needed Similar Products Used: Sigma 28-70 2.8-4 UC |
[Aug 07, 2001]
Lee Rothman
Intermediate
Strength:
Amazing Crispness wide open or tele end. Nicely made.
Weakness:
So far NONE An amazing buy with performance that eclipsed the Canon 17-35 2.8 in my side by side comparison at a store. I hope it holds up better than some have said as right now it is essentially perfect. This has to be the "preferred" lens for a realistic price on the entire market. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Canon 17-35 2.8L |
[Aug 07, 2001]
Angelo Simo
Professional
Strength:
Price Small Sharp Dam-close to canon
Weakness:
HSM is a joke it clicks This is the second time around with this lens and me. The first one the HSM moter failed on me after one year and I replaced it with a canon 17-35 2.8L. Well the canon is some were in the bottem of the sea I droped it on a shoot the fish must like it and I miss it. Im so pissed off that I droped it. Well thats were the Sigma enters in it is a really good lens I just hope the HSM moter will hold up longer than the first one did. Customer Service So So the guy in the US Similar Products Used: Canon 17-35 |