Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3 APO RF 35mm Zoom

Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3 APO RF 35mm Zoom 

DESCRIPTION

This great lens combines a 5 lens group zoom system with an aspherical lens element to deliver sharp high contrast images throughout the entire zoom range. Using Sigma's unique apochromatic lens design and three SLD glass elements, the aberrations usually found in ultra-telephoto lenses have been eliminated. And with Sigma's new focusing system, the front lens group doesn't rotate, which makes using polarized filters a snap. A convenient built-in rotary tripod mount eliminates vibration during shutter release.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-20 of 41  
[Mar 26, 2006]
Tonys
Expert

Strength:

Price. 500mm zoom lens. It does take great pictures. It works well on my S3. It made me buy a better tripod which has wroked great with other equipment I have. It is a good budget lens that doesn't feel budget and performs better than you might think. It is one of the non Nikon Lens that I really like.

Weakness:

Zoom crrep, not that big of an issue, but put a lock on the thing (Sigma). I hate taking the thing of my tripod and hearing the lens slam down towards the ground as it slides out. I forget sometimes it likes to creep. This has never hurt the lens but the sound sure can unerve you. The filter size makes finding filters a job and when you do the price is a little stunning. I got a good uv filter just for protection and paid over 120 for it. I looked at the polarizer but figured I would sve the money for another lens, it was that expensive.

You probably want find anotther 500mm that works was well for the price, it works well for all the limitations you have read in other reviews. I have found a tripod is mandatory for use with this lens, a good tripod, heavy. It has lens creep which really is not that to much of an issue. I use it mainly on my S3. I have had no problems witht the images using this combanation. This is only when i have it on the tripod. The lens is big but not big, It can get heavy lugging it around on the tripod. It is not the fastes focusing lens but using a 400vr also I can say that lens is not a speed demon either. I think getting into these zoom ranges and what they are used for by most the AF speed is something we live with. I just look at it as a trade off for being able to reach out and this lens will reach out.

I used it once at a wakeboarding event. I placed the tripod where I had a good view of the ramp and did get some great photographs, not alot, but enough that I was pleased with the perfermance of the lens. I could not have got these shots with any other lens because of the distance. So it did what I bought it for. I have not used it on my D200 and most likley will not becasue of reported issues with this camera and Sigma Lens.

If you want to get in this range and do not want to break the bank, this lens will do the job. Once you know the limitations it really is a great lens for a non Nikon lens. I know everyone praises good nikon glass, me included, but there some other options that work when you find them and for a alot less. I am a Nikon dude all the way, but I like to save some money to. I bought this lens for a specific purpose, not everyday use. It is a tool that works when I need it. .

Similar Products Used:

80-400vr, love it.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 13, 2006]
tomthephotographer
Expert

Strength:

Crisp Sharp images. Auto Focus is not as slow as some seem to think. It might be a System thing more than a lens issue.

Weakness:

Heavy, Zoom Creap. No Filters. Lens hood is soft plastic.

Good Price and product. It is my third Sigma lens. Have used this lens on a Canon EOS ELANIIe and now mostly on a Digital Rebal xt. I Wish I could Find a 19 to 200 that was this good.

Customer Service

Great, They are retunning it to work better with my Digital systems.

Similar Products Used:

Canon 70-200 and a couple of nikor lens.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 08, 2004]
ppurpura
Intermediate

Strength:

Price. Good optics for the money

Weakness:

Zoom creep. Tripod is very unbalanced when at 500 mm zoom setting and this therefore hard to adjust vertically, but more likely is that I probably have a lousy tripod.

This lens is a great value for the money. I am not a professional photographer; I just love to take pictures. Therefore I need to get the most value for my money since I am on a modest budget, and this lens gives me exactly that. Using this lens at its 500 mm setting on a Nikon D100 Digital Camera, I took the most beautiful shot of a Tiger Swallow Tail butterfly on a thistle plant. The smaller image size results in an effective zoom of approximately 750 mm. The color was absolutely superb and the focus was sharp. I have also taken many moon shots and achieved very good results. Picture stat’s follow. Focal Length: 500 mm F-Number: F/6.3 Exposure Time: 1/90 sec Metering Mode: Pattern Exposure Program: Normal Exposure Compensation: -1 step So if you want a good quality zoom lens for a modest price, this lens will fill that niche perfectly.

Customer Service

Excellent

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Dec 02, 2003]
still_jj
Expert

Strength:

Cheap, long, and not awful.

Weakness:

I really really would prefer a sharper lens, and yes, I've used this on a heavy 'pod, etc. STOP IT DOWN TO AT LEAST 11. Always

Good if you can stop down and there's no wind. I've seen problems when there was wind, the barrel isn't stiff enough then. It's not GREAT, just good.

Customer Service

None needed.

Similar Products Used:

Nikor 70-210

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 27, 2003]
xerxes_7
Professional

Strength:

.sharpnes .colour .price .build "though not too pro. type" .case

Weakness:

86c ? AF noise

Great lens , for the price even better !! colours seem to come out rather good , the AF is a bit slow but nothing that would keep u from buyin' this lens,

Customer Service

not yet :)

Similar Products Used:

Canon : 135mm f/2 L , 70-200 f/2.8 L 28-70 f/2.8 L 24mm f/3.5 L "tilt shift" 75-300 f/4-5.6 Usm IS Tokina :28-70 Atx Pro SV

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 09, 2003]
paolopizzi
Expert

Strength:

- Price, price, price, price, price. - Excellent telephoto range. - Optical quality. - APO glass. - Hood and soft case (very nice!) included.

Weakness:

- Slow (needs tripod + fast film or ISO 800 setting on a D100) - Lens creeps, no zoom lock. - Focus ring isn't smooth - 86-mm business end means any filter will be hard-to-find and outrageously expensive. - AF could be faster

This is an excellent telephoto zoom for its price (at least as far as Nikon mounts go), but it's bulky (though not as much as pro lenses of this size) and a bit on the slow side. To compensate for these deficiencies, a sturdy tripod and fast film (400 or, even better, 800) are a must, if you want to get the most out of this lens. Fortunately Sigma provides a quick-release tripod collar that "feels" very professional. The AF is not bad but certainly not a speed champion, meaning that using this lens to shoot flying birds (or airplanes) is not the easiest task in the world (albeit still feasible, as a matter of facts, I've done it with good results.) The optical quality is excellent, the lens is very sharp (especially when stopped down at f/8) from 200 to about 420, but visibly softer at both ends, especially at 500. The construction is nice but of course there's a lot of plastic, although not the cheap/light type seen on Nikkor G lenses. The focus ring is very sensibly located nearest to the camera and therefore easy to access when you focus manually. The zoom ring is not completely smooth but it's not too big of a problem. By my experience, the only other Nikon mount in this price range as good as this one is the Tamron 200-400 f/5.6. I have extensively compared the two and found the Tamron better (and faster @300) in the 200-300 range while the Sigma has an edge from 300 to 400. Yes, of course the Sigma also gives you an extra 400-500 range, but it can only be used until 450 and then it gets too soft for my tastes. The Sigma also wins on color faithfulness, thanks to its APO glass. I read concerns from other reviwers about using a 2x teleconverter with this lens. Well, I found no problems whatsoever coupling this lens to a Tamron MC-7 (7-element 2x TC), although I have heard (but I can't confirm it) that none of the smaller 4-element TC's can be used with this lens. I guess the Sigma APO EX TC's are fully compatible (but of course quite expensive.)

Customer Service

Never used so far. None of my Sigma lenses ever had problems (am I lucky or Sigma gear is actually that reliable?)

Similar Products Used:

- Tamron 200-400 - Nikkor pro-gear (rented)

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 26, 2003]
Lthlwpn1979
Intermediate

Strength:

Great zoom range Rear auto-focus ring in perfect spot Case AND hood included (no such luck with other brands) Quick release tripod collar

Weakness:

Weight, tripod use neccessary Odd sized filters (86C) hard to come by and pricy.

This truly a good lens. The 500mm of zoom allows you to reach out and touch someone. I got a few head shots of bears from a (relatively) safe distance. Even though it's a 500mm, it is fairly easy to transport; it's smaller and lighter that older 500mm lenses I've seen. The focusing ring is near the base of the lense, so you can focus with your thumb and not have to adjust a circular polarizer; should you find one. The pics I took had very good color and definition. The only problems I had came along with taking shots in low light and with using auto-focus in the woods, not the lens's fault. This is a great buy for those who do outdoor work but can't or don't want to get too close to their subjects.

Customer Service

not needed

Similar Products Used:

none

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jun 19, 2003]
Michael Allen
Intermediate

Strength:

Good range - distinguished from most lens in this class by being able to go not just to 400mm, but all the way to 500mm. Good clarity Good autofocus operation and acceptable manual focus operation Tripod mount Hood included Case included Four-year warranty Significantly lighter than brighter 400mm or 500mm lens alternatives

Weakness:

Nothing that would cause me to reject this lens for any serious work: Manual focus (although rarely needed) could be better if geared down like Sigma's new 120-300mm f2.8. Small maximum aperture (mitigated by using good low-light films like Provia 400) 86mm objective lens requires very expensive filters (if you feel the need to use any)

I am thoroughly pleased with this lens. I was apprehensive about buying it because I had never handled one or checked it with my N80 body. I was also concerned about comments here regarding its autofocus speed and small maximum aperture. Having now photographed a soccer game and several wildlife subjects (including a black bear under the canopy of dense forest), I have no reservations about recommending this lens to any Nikon users. I suspect versions for other brands are equally suitable. Using Fuji Superia 800 print film, I have gotten very good results - virtually indistinguishable from my more affluent shooting partner's F100 and 80-400 VR combination. The Sigma focuses very accurately as a general rule. In identical situations, my partner's VR searched just as much as my Sigma before settling. Results using Fuji Sensia 100 slide film have also been very good with the camera on a tripod. Admittedly, the aperture is too small to use slow film in low light. But even a $7,000 500mm f4 is going to be limited under these circumstances. I think it's a great lens, even at street prices of $450 to $600. I wish there was a 4.5-star rating to assign to this lens. I can't give it the perfect 5 because there are better lenses than this out there. But 4 stars is under-rated, too.

Customer Service

N/A

Similar Products Used:

Nikkor 80-400 VR Sigma 70-300 Macro Super

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 23, 2003]
PHOTOMONKEY
Professional

Strength:

1. PRICE 2. Fair to good image quality 3. PRICE 4. Sweet spot between 300-40mm 5. PRICE 6. Industrial tripod collar 7. PRICE 8. Customer Service 9. PRICE 10. Great carrying case and hood provided.

Weakness:

1. Optical quality is shy of a pro level, but workable. 2. Full zoom brings on some serious distortion as will 150mm. 3. What is that filter size....82c or something like that - YIKES! 4. Zoom creeps terribly. 5. Slow AF - hunts alot especially in lower light conditions.

Is it fast? Nope! Is it top notch optics? Nope! Is it heavy? A little. Does it take decent pictures? Indeed! Is it professional grade (whatever that means)? Nope! However, it is $609 at B&H and that in itself is an amazing reason for carefully considering the purchase of this fine zoom lens. I bought mine just over a year ago after trying an associate's unit. I liked it, but was a little disappointed with the sharpness near 170mm and at full zoom. I asked him how much he paid for it and he told me...my jaw dropped to the bottom of the canoe we were on! I had reneted a Canon 400mm f4 for this trip and it was like carrying a baby around with me. In the end the proof was in the pudding! The ratio of keeper images to throw-aways was almost identicle for both the L glass and the Sigma. This is not to say that if you have the money and the drive to go pro...it's L glass all the way! However, for those of us on a tight budget this lens will get you seeing visions of hummingbirds, far off boats, airplanes, and just about any other distant object dancing lazily in your mind as you wait for the FedEx person to tap your chamber door and hand over the lens!

Customer Service

Awesome! Called Sigma prior to purchase to confirm compatability with my back-ups, an Elan 7 and Rebel 2000, and engineer was truly helpful.

Similar Products Used:

1. Canon EOS 400mm f/4 L 2. Sigma 50-500 f4/6.3 APO EX HSM 3. Tamron 200-400 f/5.6 LD-IF

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[May 01, 2003]
Lev Boguslavsky
Intermediate

Strength:

sharp, sharp, sharp, sharp... nice looking (haha) zoom range

Weakness:

heavy zoom creep plastic body - too much

I have bought this lens about 2 monhts ago, and since then have made about 10 rolls of film with it and i can say that its AN ABSOLUTELY GREAT PIECE OF OPTICS. knowing myself as a really demanding photographer, this lens didnt disappoint me in almost every aspect. i have pictured many object with this lens: insects, sunsets, people, and mostly flowers. in summary, the sharpness was more than great. it was sharp as a diamond shape. with that, the firld of sharpness was pretty short, and its due to the long focal distance, but with the aperture more than 11 it became deeper. the central sharpness was exellent, e.g. on my pictures with flowers, made from the distance of more than 5 meters from the object, every detail and every point can be seen on every leaf. the colour reproduction is perfect, very natual looking. speaking about technical aspects, there are some weaknesses but not a big problem to me. first, the zoom creep is annoying but doesnt haPPEN if u dont leave the lens with its face down. pretty heave but come on - its 170-500!!!!! the absence of 2.8 aperture makes this lens cheep, but in the most cases its ok, maximum u can use up to 3200 asa. expensive, but great films. outer lens diameter is enormous - i think 82mm, and its bad for filters. everything else was very good. in a few words - this lens worth it, without any BUT.

Customer Service

-

Similar Products Used:

none

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 11-20 of 41  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com