Tokina AF 193 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5 35mm Zoom
Tokina AF 193 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5 35mm Zoom
[Feb 08, 2001]
PANAYIOTIS KACHIHTIS
Intermediate
Strength:
FEEL.BUILD QUALITY.VERY GOOD FOR THE MONEY
Weakness:
COULD BE FASTER VERY GOOD PERFORMANCE AND BUILD QUALITY FOR THE MONEY.I REALLY LIKE THIS LENS.WHAT A SMOOTH OPERATION.OF COURSE IT COULD BE FASTER APERTURE WISE BUT THEN AGAIN YOU CAN'T HAVE IT ALL CAN YOU? Customer Service NOT NEEDED YET Similar Products Used: PENTAX 35-80 |
[Feb 09, 2001]
Pat O'Neill
Intermediate
Strength:
Lightweight, compact, versitile, Nice and wide.
Weakness:
lens hood is a joke. A great entry level lens, inexpensive, and light-weight. Produces sharp prints, even to 16X20. Sharpness sweet-spot is f8 - f11, which is ideal for landscape anyway. Customer Service na Similar Products Used: sigma 17-35 |
[Feb 16, 2001]
eric carleson
Intermediate
Strength:
cheap and wide zoom?
Weakness:
everything. the lense tself is erypoorly built and would break with any drop or good bump. the optical quality is about what you should expect for $200. the lense is so plastic that it makes a vivitar sound good. this lense is a very cheap lense. peple who buy this lense generally don't want to shell out 1500 for a pro wide zoom. thats very understandable. but I wouldn't suggest this lense to my worst enemy on my worst day. I would suggest the tokina 20-35 f2.8 cause it's only $550 for that and it has excellent qualities all the way through. or the nikon 18-35 that just came out, or for canon there the 20-35 f3.5-4.5. try to avoid this lense if you can afford it, cause believe me your getting what you pay for. be cheap and thats what you got. Customer Service none. Similar Products Used: 20-40 tamron. 20 35 nikon. 17-35 nikon. |
[Mar 18, 2001]
Patrice LACOUTURE
Intermediate
Strength:
The construction feels very "serious", although lightweight. The rings are really smooth, even the focussing ring (Pentax AF) which is slightly too few braked, but not loose.
Weakness:
Distortion is really noticeable. I had to choose between this lens and the SIGMA 17-35 f/2.8-4.0 EX. Customer Service Not needed, yet... Cross fingers. Similar Products Used: Pentax 28-70 f/4.0 AL for the 28-35 range |
[Mar 14, 2001]
Steve Lutz
Intermediate
Strength:
Light weight, fit and finish very good. Feels sturdy. Optically quite good when stopped down to f/8 or more.
Weakness:
At this price, no real weaknesses. This is a very good value in the ultra wide zoom category. I considered the Sigma 17-35, but this was less than half the price of the Sigma. I also considered the Canon 20-35, but that was $350 used. Simply too much money for the Canon. I have used this Tokina for a couple of weeks, and shot about 8 rolls and have reached the following conclusions: Customer Service not used Similar Products Used: No ultra wide zooms |
[Apr 09, 2001]
Justin Bregar
Expert
Strength:
Cheap, wide coverage, excellent build quality, cheap.
Weakness:
Some light falloff in the corners, some softness also in the corners, heavy. An excellent consumer lens. I didn't want to spend mega-bucks for this focal length since it's not one of my primary lenses, and this fit the bill well. The sharpness is outstanding and the construction is excellent. It sure doesn't feel like plastic to me, but they tell me it is. Customer Service Haven't had any contact with them. Similar Products Used: Nikon AF-S 17-35/2.8, Tokina 20-35/2.8 ATX, Sigma 17-35/2.8-4 |
[Apr 05, 2001]
Steve M
Expert
Strength:
very sharp stopped down excellent color/contrast
Weakness:
hood should be provided with lens This is an OUTSTANDING consumer wide angle zoom lens. Sharpness is good wide open, and excellent stopped down. Distortion levels are modest for a wide zoom. Great for outdoor photography! Customer Service not needed Similar Products Used: Canon 24-85 |
[Apr 26, 2001]
Steven Wrthy
Expert
Strength:
Sharp and contrasty lens. Was purchased to go beyond the range of my Canon 28-105 lens. I shoot with it more than the Canon lens.Tokina blows it away at the 28 and 35 range.
Weakness:
None noted so far. If you want a wide angle zoom and do not want to pay much money, get this lens! While its not an L-series lens, but for the money, its not bad. Also, I did not want to pay the bigger money for the Sigma product in this category. May step up to the Tokina pro AtX version later on, but for now, this lens is more of my primary lens. Customer Service Have not tried yet but rebate took forever to come back! Similar Products Used: None |
[Apr 24, 2001]
Steve Croxton
Expert
Strength:
Decent build quality, inexpensive
Weakness:
Focusing ring has no real feel to it, but that's nit picking. Excellent lens for those who want to add a ultra wide-wide zoom to their arsenal, but don't want to blow a wad on a dedicated lens or pay the inflated price of one of the other second party makers. Auto focus, though a bit noisy, is surprisingly quick. Build quality was also better than I expected after reading reviews here. Money well spent! Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: Sigma 17-35mm |
[May 06, 2001]
Zave Shapiro
Casual
Strength:
Versatile range. No wobbles or rough noises. Low distortion. Smooth controls.
Weakness:
Light build quality. Extra charge for shade. Falloff at wider apertures. My default lens. Good feel, nice performance when stopped down, may really be 19mm at wide end (Vivitar won't go as wide). Fairly quiet and doesn't hunt (on a Canon A2). Build and performance are quite nice - for the money they're great. Similar Products Used: Vivitar 19-35 Series 1 in manual focus. |