Kodak EasyShare Z980 Review

Camera Reviews Kodak Uncategorized

 
Kodak EasyShare Z980 Image Quality
Photographs from the Z980 look good at first glance. The average Joe (or Jane) is going to be pleased. Smart Capture exposes typical scenes well, and scene modes work well in the situations they’re designed for. Colors are accurate and nicely saturated.

Kodak EasyShare Z980 - Summer Squash

But looking more closely reveals an ugly surprise: The Z980 has an awful lot of noise (which, although technically different, looks a lot like what we called “grain” in the old days of film cameras). Comparing studio sample photos with other cameras I recently reviewed (Sony DSC-H50 and Panasonic Lumix TZ5), shows that the Kodak Z980 is markedly noisier, whether at ISO 100 or 1600. And the DSC-H50 and TZ5 both have similar specs and sensor dimensions. However, the Kodak does have one-third more pixels than those two cameras – 9.1 megapixels compared to the Z980′s 12. Smaller pixels usually mean more noise and that could be the problem. It remains to be seen how the Z980′s noise compares to similar superzooms like the Nikon Coolpix P90 and Olympus SP-590.

Some images also reveal problems that are probably related to the extreme lens length: chromatic aberration that appears as a blue glow on tree branches against a light sky, as well as softness and distortion in the corners. I also spotted some digital oddities, like occasional oversaturated reds and muddy, greenish blotches in shadows. Again, the average amateur probably isn’t going to notice things like these, but more demanding photographers will.

Finally, the Z980′s touted ability to capture RAW image files was a disappointment. In theory, shooting KDC RAW (Kodak Digital Image) rather than JPEG images should give you more color information and a wider dynamic range to work with when your editing your photos on the computer. This is an important consideration for many serious photographers. But in practice, trying to use Kodak’s RAW files turned out to be an exercise in frustration.

While I could successfully import KDC files from my memory card using the Kodak EasyShare Software installed on my computer, I couldn’t do anything with them once they were there. I couldn’t open them in Photoshop CS3. Adobe does have a Camera Raw update for Photoshop CS4 that supports the KDC RAW files. But if you don’t have Photoshop CS4, that’s not much help. I couldn’t edit the KDC files in the Kodak software, either – I got an error message when I tried. Furthermore, I couldn’t import KDC files from my hard drive into the Kodak software.

To try to solve this mystery, I used the 24/7 Live Chat customer support offered on Kodak’s Web site. I spent one hour and two minutes trying to get answers from a representative who a) did not seem to speak English as a first language, and b) seemed to be preoccupied with something else – probably about 20 other chats. With agonizing detail, the chat’s timestamps showed that I typically waited anywhere from two to nine minutes for her to respond to my brief replies. Eventually, she did confirm that Kodak’s software does not support Kodak’s own proprietary file type. Outrageous.

Kodak EasyShare Z980 - Sour Cherries Kodak EasyShare Z980 - Cabin and Antlers Kodak EasyShare Z980 - Fireworks in Butte, America
Kodak EasyShare Z980 - Raspberries Kodak EasyShare Z980 - Ranch Truck Kodak EasyShare Z980 - Early Evening

Click on thumbnails to view sample photos.

next pageKodak EasyShare Z980 Conclusion >>

Introduction Features & Design Camera Experience Image Quality Conclusion

Next page

Related Articles


NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Photo-John says:

    Thanks for the great review, Patia. I think this is your best review yet. I agree that the image quality from this camera leaves something to be desired. Image quality has been improving so much that the studio samples for this camera really show how far behind this camera is. I also think the images look terribly oversaturated. This may be a conscious decision by Kodak as they probably look great on the LCD and to the untrained eye. But that kind of oversaturation means the images are already pushed pretty hard when they come out of the camera, leaving little room for clean post-processing. If this were my camera I’d turn down the in-camera saturation.

  • Patia says:

    Thanks, John. As always, there’s a real trade-off between features, image quality and price. The Z980 is no exception. It will be a great camera for those who want a full-featured camera and a super-long lens at a good price. Average consumers won’t notice the difference in image quality.

  • Thanks for the useful information. Kodak is always known for its high quality products. I am impressed by the design. 12 mp camera is really good. Image quality is very nice. Its a nice performer.

  • Hi!

    Congratulations! Your readers have submitted and voted for your blog at The Daily Reviewer. We compiled an exclusive list of the Top 100 Photography Blogs, and we are glad to let you know that your blog was included! You can see it at http://thedailyreviewer.com/top/photography/3

    You can claim your Top 100 Blogs Award here : http://thedailyreviewer.com/pages/badges/photography

    P.S. This is a one-time notice to let you know your blog was included in one of our Top 100 Blog categories. You might get notices if you are listed in two or more categories.

    P.P.S. If for some reason you want your blog removed from our list, just send an email to angelina@thedailyreviewer.com with the subject line “REMOVE” and the link to your blog in the body of the message.

    Cheers!

    Angelina Mizaki
    Selection Committee President
    The Daily Reviewer
    http://thedailyreviewer.com

  • DC says:

    This looks like a great camera, can’t wait to try it out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*