Home | Login | Register
Camera reviews, digital camera reviews, and photography community

REVIEWS:  Lenses:  35mm Primes:
400mm f/5.6 APO Tele Macro

Sample Images
More Products from Sigma
Link to this page

Sigma 400mm f/5.6 APO Tele Macro


 
Sort by Latest Review >> |  Sort by Best Rating >> |  Sort by Worst Rating >> |  View All >>
Next 5 Reviews >>
Rating
Reviewed by: 

Dirk

( Intermediate)

Review Date
April 5, 2007

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 1 of 17

Price Paid:  $300.00 from eBay

Summary:

Works very well on my Nikon D80, aperture controlled, and also works good with a Kenko 1,4 teleconverter. No CA, no periscopic view, really good quality pictures. Only wish it was a little bit faster (5.6). At F8 absolutely 100% quality !!

Strengths:

Price, built, quality of the pictures, less distortions as new zooms.

Weaknesses:

Weight, not fast

Similar Products Used:

non

Customer Service:

no



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

Maxim Novikov

( Intermediate)

Review Date
February 27, 2006

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 2 of 17

Price Paid:  $0.00 from e-bay

Summary:

The lens is very sharp, well balanced, easy and convenient to use, mechanics works smoothly. When shhoting a 6MP camera, the limiting factor is clearly the sensor, not the lens. It handles so well, even many of hand-held shots are very sharp. Flare is seemingly well controlled - I did a couple of sunset shots and did not see any problems. For this price, there are simply no competitors on the market. Sorry, they discontinued it.

Strengths:

Optical quality Build quality. Balance Built-in shade Tripod collar.

Weaknesses:

rear cap (at least in the Pentax-mount model) is a bad joke, you have to replace it immediately or risk sompromizing te rear lens.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

Maxim Novikov

( Intermediate)

Review Date
February 27, 2006

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Rate this review?

Review 3 of 17

Price Paid:  $0.00 from e-bay

Summary:

The lens is very sharp, well balanced, easy and convenient to use, mechanics works smoothly. When shhoting a 6MP camera, the limiting factor is clearly the sensor, not the lens. It handles so well, even many of hand-held shots are very sharp. Flare is seemingly well controlled - I did a couple of sunset shots and did not see any problems. For this price, there are simply no competitors on the market. Sorry, they discontinued it.

Strengths:

Optical quality Build quality. Balance Built-in shade Tripod collar.

Weaknesses:

rear cap (at least in the Pentax-mount model) is a bad joke, you have to replace it immediately or risk sompromizing te rear lens.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

davejon

( Intermediate)

Review Date
June 8, 2005

Overall Rating
 2 of 5

Value Rating
 3 of 5

Used product for
1 to 3 months

Visitors rate this review
2.50 of 5,
2 votes

Rate this review?

Review 4 of 17

Price Paid:  $400.00 from KEH--used

Summary:

I bought this lens used from KEH to use on my new Nikon D70. At first I thought my pictures were blurry because my tripod wasn't solid enough. After a lot of tests I found two problems. First, it was horrible wide open at f/5.6. It got better at f/8, but that was too slow for what I needed. Second, it had a very bad "front focus" problem. Which meant that, when the lens was set to auto focus, it would actually focus a little in front of the subject it should focus on. This caused serious blur. I spent a lot of time trying to make sure it was a problem with the lens and not the camera. I finally got my hands on another D70 and reproduced the problem with it. Manual focus worked fine. But, it still was horrible at f/5.6. I have the 300mm f/4 Sigma APO Macro lens and it works great, even wide open. I sent this lens back to KEH for repair (under the 60-day warranty) and was told that it is not repairable because the chip in the lens is no longer available. I'm waiting for a refund at this time. I'm now using the Sigma 300mm APO Macro lens with a Kenko Pro 300 1.4x converter. That combination works very well and was much cheaper than having both the 300mm and 400mm. I'm giving this lens a low rating to serve as a warning to those interested in buying one. Since there probably is no repair available make sure you get some kind of return policy in case you get a deffective one like I did.

Strengths:

Probably a good lens if you get one that doesn't have a bad chip and works better wide open.

Weaknesses:

Very soft/blurry wide open. "Front focus" problem Lens cannot be repaired if the chip goes bad.

Similar Products Used:

Sigma 300mm f/4 APO Macro

Customer Service:

Sigma customer service called me to tell me the lens was not repairable, even though KEH sent it to them. The Sigma rep was nice, but there was a serious language barrier. I could not get him to understand that he needs to send the lens back to KEH because they are the one's who sent it to Sigma. I called KEH to warn them that I would probably get the lens from Sigma. They told me just to send it to them if that happens and they would take care of it. KEH customer service is great.



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Rating
Reviewed by: 

Kace

( Casual)

Review Date
March 22, 2005

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5,
1 votes

Rate this review?

Review 5 of 17

Price Paid:  $400.00 from 2nd hand

Summary:

This lens is inevitably a compromise. I wanted a long lens for nature shots, so I'd have liked 500mm. Whatever you're doing you'd like something a little faster than f5.6. BUT at this price point it seems peerless. In fact it's hard to see a rival below GBP1000. Long (and inexpensive) zooms have focussing/clarity issues, f2.8 primes are great but cost you four figures and then some. This is a lens that just does enough and does it well. Good choice for the keen amateur.

Strengths:

Price. Glassware quality. Can just about hand-hold in good light. Price.

Weaknesses:

Heavy. slow f number

Similar Products Used:

Sigma 70-300 APO (fantastic)

Customer Service:

N/A



Would you like to Comment?
Join PhotographyReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
| Next 5 Reviews >>

Latest Pro Reviews:
2008 PMA Tradeshow Coverage
2008 PMA Tradeshow
Camera News:
Get Newsletter!
Enter e-mail address for PhotographyREVIEW
newsletter

 MtbREVIEW.com  RoadbikeREVIEW.com  OutdoorREVIEW.com
 PhotographyREVIEW.com  VideogameREVIEW.com  ComputingREVIEW.com
 AudioREVIEW.com  CarREVIEW.com  GolfREVIEW.com

Copyright ©1996-2008 All Rights Reserved.ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit of Invenda