Voigtlander BESSA-R Rangefinders
Voigtlander BESSA-R Rangefinders
[Jun 08, 2000]
ben kamphuis
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
BESSA-R Rangefinder
Strength:
simplicity
Weakness:
the use of cheaper materials ehh ... its not (repeat not) a Leica. Customer Service not needed yet Similar Products Used: the big ... example |
[Jun 02, 2000]
domenico giannantonio
Expert
Model Reviewed:
BESSA-R Rangefinder
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None I've just bougth a black Bessa-R; the body is in plastic material! There is not a "green" (as is written in italian instructions) diode in the meter, but it are all red coloured. I have appreciated the low noise level of the shutter and the brightness of finder, better then Leica CL I normally use. Similar Products Used: Leica CL |
[Nov 22, 2000]
Lance Wood
Expert
Strength:
Overall, a well made camera. Reminds me of the Nikon FM2. Great optics, fairly quiet shutter, very reasonable priced.
Weakness:
Screw mounts are not as quick to switch as bayonet mounts. If you are looking for a Leica, this is not one. But for the price of a new Leica M6 you can outfit yourself with a Bessa R, several lenses and film. The optics are on par with many of the Leica lenses. Customer Service Haven't needed to use. Similar Products Used: I've owned Leicas, Contax G's, Nikons, and Pentax. |
[Dec 06, 2000]
Edwardo Morris
Expert
Strength:
Lightweight, compact, sturdy, bright viewfinder & rangefinder patch, makes beautiful images.
Weakness:
Odd quirks. 1) With the 35mm Color Skopar compact lens, the lens itself focuses closer than the rangefinder can move. Thus, you can't use the rangefinder to precisely focus at the lens' closest focusing distance. An avid travel photographer, I bought this camera as a replacement for my beloved Fuji 645S medium format rangefinder camera, which I dropped while on vacation, and for which Fuji no longer supplies spare parts. (Those scurvy knaves!) At first I was skeptical whether I'd be satisfied with a step down from medium format to 35mm, especially as pictures taken with my Nikon FE just couldn't quite compare with the Fuji's. However, the Voigtlander surprised me with its rich, smooth, flattering yet extremely sharp images. True, the camera doesn't have the overall resolving power of the Fuji, or for that matter the Contax G2, which was the Voigt's major competitor to replace the Fuji. But the images are so beautiful, I don't really care. Customer Service None needed. The rangefinder has never slipped out of vertical alignment, either. (I hope I'm not jinxing myself with this statement.) Similar Products Used: Contax G2 |
[Jan 25, 2001]
Mike Elek
Intermediate
Strength:
Wonderfully bright viewfinder. I'll have to check on the RF alignment. Also, the camera uses a metal lens mount and not plastic.
Weakness:
I don't care for that bump on the camera back. And the shutter speed/ISO dial, which I think it too heavily sprung, seems lifted right from an SLR. I feel some extra thought could have gone into this part of the design. I really like this camera, despite a couple of small quibbles. I owned an inexpensive Konica RF many years ago (I don't know what happened to it), as well as traditional SLRs. The one thing that I like about the rangefinder is that the image is very bright and always present. Customer Service none needed so far Similar Products Used: Also own: |
[Jan 31, 2001]
David MacIntyre
Casual
Strength:
* No-nonsense controls.
Weakness:
* Rangefinder alignment issues. I wanted a no nonsense camera and I chose the Voigtlander for several reasons; value for money, portability, full manual operation, lens performance, creative control and unobtrusive looks. The camera has been used worldwide for the past six months or so and has been subjected to fluctuations in temperature/humidity and fairly hefty knocks, yet the picture quality is never less than perfect (unless it's my mistake!!). Even with a cheap flashgun and the focus set to "infinity", it performed as a snapshot camera in restaurants, etc, when passed to someone else to take a picture. Also, the spot metering system has performed well in many different circumstances. If you are a photographic purist or want to get away from the gadgetry that comes with modern SLRs, this camera is definitely for you. However, make sure you check for RF alignment at the time of purchase. It's not a Leica, but it doesn't cost Leica money, so you shouldn't consider the two as direct competition. Customer Service The RF was out of alignment upon receipt (mail order prevented physical check prior to purchase). Customer Service replaced body with a new one within five days. No RF problems since (despite being dropped). Similar Products Used: * Nikon F50. |
[Feb 27, 2001]
Sean OKeefe
Intermediate
Strength:
Superb viewfinder, even though brightlines are manually adjusted. Focussing bright and clear. Lenses kick, the 15mm is awesome, for the $$ it is incredible.
Weakness:
Not made of metal, body seems light. Placement of strap lugs poor. Really nice camera and lenses, a cheaper alternative to Leica. Customer Service Not needed, RF was perfect out of box. Similar Products Used: Leica M4-P, various '70s RFs. |
[Mar 06, 2001]
Matt Jachyra
Professional
Strength:
Good value for you money. Bright and clear viewfinder.
Weakness:
Feels cheap. Meter failure in low light. Ok here it is. As a back up for your Leica it's great. As a begginers camera for you it's great as well. But it feels like a $100 camera ready to fall appart. Jams from time to time. Film loading is kind of hard. But for the money it's a great piece. Customer Service No expirience. But I asked a question once thru their web site and it took the 5 days to answer. Similar Products Used: I own Leica M6 so this is just a back up body. |
[Mar 04, 2001]
Kit Huen
Intermediate
Strength:
Classic looking camera.Very bright finder. Makes one feel he/she is in total control of a camera. No computer chips in the body (except the TTL system - but one is not obligated to put the batteries in). Lighter construction is actually better for the photog. RF does better than SLR in composing a picture. Lense is well made in both optics and craftsmanship. I love that little thumb notch on the batch for gripping the camera. Cheap. Great value.
Weakness:
Strap lugs can be improved. Shutter dial slippery with one finger operation. It should come with a classic brown leather camera case just like old times. What more can be said. If you haven't tried a well made modern RF camera this is your invitation. I'll buy it again. Well, maybe I'll do a little savings and go for the M6 TTL. Customer Service Has not tried the service yet. Hope I'll never have to. Similar Products Used: M2, Hexar (Not the RF), Rollei 35, |
[Mar 10, 2001]
Ron Copley
Expert
Strength:
Aluminium body is sturdy and light. All controls operate positively and efficiently. Just looks darn classy, too.
Weakness:
Strap lug placement! Meter seems to flake out approaching EV1 (this could be subjective). I've owned it since it was released, as well as the brother Bessa-L. I would like the meter diodes to be doubled in the finder and on top like the L, but we can't get it all. Camera is fantastic for street photography and it doesn't scream "Steal me!" like a Contax G2 or a Leica -- especially if you put one of those Russian Industar lenses on it... For the $$$ this is simply a great camera. Customer Service Hope to never find out. Similar Products Used: Own Alpa 10D, Olympus OM-4t, Bessa-L, 'Blad 500C/M. |