Voigtlander BESSA-R Rangefinders
Voigtlander BESSA-R Rangefinders
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 12, 2001]
Tan Allan
Beginner
Strength:
Price, Ease of use especially for those who have used a Leica before,
Weakness:
Body not solid like the Leica, the "chrome" body looks kind of cheap looking, LTM screw mount instead of M mount This is a very good camera for those who are new to rangefinders and want an affordable and competent body to try it out. It is cheaper than a mint used M3 or M6 although it comes with the LTM mount. It would be perfect if it comes with M mount. Overall you cannot fault the camera for the price you are paying. The bonus comes in the form of cheap and affordable lenses which are almost as good as the Leica and Contax counterparts. I recommend it for those who are new to rangefinders as well as as a second body to those who already own a Leica with LTM lenses. Customer Service Never used it. Similar Products Used: Contax G1, Leica M6, Canon EOS 50e |
[May 04, 2001]
antonio pinter
Intermediate
Strength:
Cheap, easy to use, great finder.
Weakness:
Cheap finish, lightweight, plastic parts. Meter overxpose by one f-stop (easy to work with this - just double ISO setting) I love the camera, altough I'd have liked to pay 20% more for a better finished a strongly feeling metal camera. Let's say a camera which is on par with the (great) finish of lenses. It is not a Leica, but it is a wonderful piece to rediscover your LOVE for photography. I'm shoothing like a crazy and I am having FUN. I go into the streets, I shoot my kids, I feel like I'd continuosly like to click click and click. And the pictures turn out outstanding, really great glass (I come from Nikon AI - not bad stuff). It's a whole different feeling from SLR, and I love it. Focusing is odd at start if you are used to reflex, but the rangenfinder is bright and easy as any other rangefinder I tried. I am now completely used to it. The M3 I tried isn't better. Customer Service Still did not try Similar Products Used: Leica III |
[May 16, 2001]
Raimon Calders
Intermediate
Strength:
Very well made.
Weakness:
None I have no problem with the rangefinder alignement. The viewfinder is very bright. The camera is a pleasure to use and makes a new feeling to photography.Buy it and happy shooting. Sorry about my English Similar Products Used: Canon EOS 50 (Elan) |
[May 30, 2001]
Tom Wolff
Professional
Strength:
Small quiet quality of
Weakness:
rangefinder is harder to use than Leica.PC connection works sometimes. I really love the camera and can overlook most shortcomings Customer Service good- I had to exchane a lense because of seperation of elements Similar Products Used: Leica |
[Jun 02, 2001]
Tom Pavitt
Professional
Strength:
The rangefinder is very easy to use. Camera simplicity is also a strength. The price.
Weakness:
Only obvious rangefinder camera shortcomings. I bought the camera for a personal use item. It's very light, easy to use. Refreshingly back to basics. I'd wish for a slightly sturdier feeling body but for the price I'm not complaining and the optics are superb. I bought the black one, the 35 mm f1.7 lens and the 75 mm lens. No complaints - maybe I'll buy a wide angle. Customer Service Haven't tried it. Similar Products Used: Various Fuji Rangefinders of different formats. |
[Jun 26, 2001]
Damian Mulinix
Professional
Strength:
Very bright view finder. Nice sized RF patch. Outstanding price and quality.
Weakness:
Terrible spot for strap plugs. Rewind crank a little funky in design. Plastic/rubberized film door.Definitely doesn't have that indestructable feel like an M6 or F5 cameras do. I have been a profesional photojournalist for over 5 years and recently (last year) had wanted to get into a rangefinder for various reasons. One of which is the fact that the RF is such an understated photographic tool. I work to take the most telling photos of people and to do so I must make myself as invisible as possible. Using large SLR outfits this is very hard. Despite how quiet the F5 is, it is still nowhere near as quiet as an RF, such as the Bessa-R. It is a great little camera with some small weaknesses (listed above). I have not used Leica M system before so I cannot attest to the religious experience that people claim to. All I know is that I have had the camera for a short time and I have taken to it fairly quickly and have already taken some very nice images while on assignment. The 35mm 2.5 is a sharp lens, and the fact that you can hand hold the camera and lens down to 1/2 sec. is outstanding and definitely makes up for the quarter stop or whatever it is between itself and the Leica 35mm f 2. Customer Service None yet Similar Products Used: Nikon F - F5 |
[Jun 26, 2001]
Claudio Guglielmone
Expert
Strength:
Voigtlander optics.
Weakness:
Build quality not at top level (but Ok for the price) The real value of this camera really is in its line of lenses, especially the extreme wide-angle 12 mm and 15 mm. I have a Nikkor 15 mm but I use it very seldom because if is very prone to flares: the rangefinder Voigtlander is much easier to use under all lighting situations. The quality of all the optics is very good, especially if you consider the price. Customer Service Not tried yet. Similar Products Used: Contax G1&G2 (owned and sold) |
[Aug 08, 2001]
Igor Baranov
Expert
Strength:
Small, solid, excellent handling and nice viewfinder, precise metering, good controls, very good lenses.
Weakness:
Not very quet, film door can be scratched even by a nail (!?). Rangefinder alignment most likely need to be done. Doesn't feel reliable. I really wanted to like that camera. Rangefinder is a very nice tool to use. I always wanted to own Leica, but traveling with $10000 of equipment in the bag? No, thanks... And Bessa-R seemed to be the one for me. But rangefinder camera is suppose to be a precise instrument that needs brains to be operated but rewards you with superb results, right? I tried two cameras and 15 and 75mm lenses. First body wouldn't operate at all. I took the demo and played with it for 2 weeks. I found a gross misalignment of rangefinder. It actually focuses half an inch past target at 1 meter. Not sure, but probably misses infinity as well, which is already a camera problem, not the rangefinder's. And that film door!!! Catches scratches from everything. I also compared my Nikon lenses (16mm, 20mm, and 85 1.4D). Sorry guy's... Nikon is better. So I am back to Nikon... Customer Service Haven't tried, but be ready to use one. Similar Products Used: Russian made FED and Zorky. Nikon F5, F80. |
[Aug 14, 2001]
Halldor Thormar
Intermediate
Strength:
The optics are first class
Weakness:
Plastic body This camera is great for value. At first it seems to be rather fragile with its plastic rubberized body, but that does not seem to be a problem on most modern SLR's. It is very light and compact, and is truly a great camera for travels. I have two body's with the 25, 35c and the 75 mm lenses. For me that covers most of the range that I use. I still use my large Canon F1 outfit though, but compared to the Bessa it seems like carrying a tank around. The Quality of the lenses is very impressive, and from what I have seen the are in no way second to Leica. One of the things I liked most was the discovery of an all mechanical shutter, because I am fed up with batteries failing. I was a little bit dissapointed with the sound of the shutter release, because I had expected it to be more quiet. First and foremost this camera is great value for money, and real fun to use. Customer Service Not tried Similar Products Used: Leica CL |
[Aug 20, 2001]
Jason Li
Expert
Strength:
fine optics
Weakness:
metering not accurate for low light conditions. I have a Bessa-R body and a Nokton 50 mm lens. I get fine pictures from this cute camera when it works the way a good camera is supposed to. Similar Products Used: None |