WPtouch Pro Theme Preview

Reload

9 responses

  1. John
    January 6, 2011

    Thanks for the review. I have two questions:

    1. What is the change in terms of image quality from photographing with ISO 200 instead of ISO 100?

    2. Between the XZ-1 and the E-PL2, which one would you recommend, and for what? I believe the price is similar, but the E-PL2 (or E-PL1) have larger sensor, and therefore I imagine better photos (at least at higher ISO). So why would anybody buy the XZ-1? The only advantage I can see with the XZ-1 is the smaller size.

    Thanks a lot!

  2. thien
    January 6, 2011

    Will the PP-1 Bluetooth Communication Device work with the EPL-1?

  3. Photo-John
    January 6, 2011

    Thien – I’m not absoluetly sure but I assume the reason the E-PL2 has the new AP2 accessory port is to accomodate the Penpal. So I’m guessing it won’t work with your E-PL1.

    John – The image quality at ISO 200 with the E-PL2 should be very close to the same as ISO 100, although there has to be some difference. Olympus hasn’t changed anything regarding image quality except bumping the ISO range up a bit. ISO 200 with the E-PL2 should be the same as ISO 200 with the E-PL1. Check high-res E-PL1 studio sample photos taken with the E-PL1 in our sample photos section. Those samples should answer your question: http://www.photographyreview.com/samplephotoscrx.aspx

    As for whether the XZ-1 or the E-PL2 is the better camera? That’s really a personal choice. The E-PL2 is a system camera with interchangeable lenses and better image quality. The XZ-1 should have great image quality for a compact camera but it’s not intended to compete with the E-PL2. The XZ-1 is really a high-end pocket camera. It’s a bit big for a pants pocket, but that’s the market it’s amined at – serious photographers who want a ful-featured pocket camera.

  4. thien
    January 6, 2011

    Damn that AP2! Now I have to sell my EPL-1!

  5. Dave
    January 6, 2011

    Quick question-

    How is the actual shooting performance of the camera? One of the more widespread complaints against the other 3 PENs was the slower autofocus or focus hunting in darker light. I read something about Olympus speeding up the focus to compete with the best-in-class for the E-PL2. I believe dpreview had listed AF speed of the E-PL1 right around .5 sec at its best and the comparable GF1 clocked in at arount .25 sec. (these #s might not be exact).

    In any case, my main concern with the E-PL1 was how it was going to hold up with moving subjects or subjects in low-light conditions. I know the Panny 20mm lens was boost to the performance but it would be great to know if there is a real, felt improvement in this area for the E-PL2. Thus far, every hand-on preview I’ve read hasn’t touches the subject. Thanks for any insight you can provide!

  6. PAul
    January 6, 2011

    Very nice, John.
    It makes me even more confident that I should NOT buy the E-P2 to replace my E-P1.
    Instead I am going to wait for the E-P3 to get this enhanced accessory socket.

  7. John
    January 7, 2011

    Thanks! I hope you can add sample photos of the XZ-1 as soon as possible. I really want to compare them to the EPL1.

    Cheers!

  8. Craig
    January 8, 2011

    I have the same questions/concerns as Dave. Wondering what Olympus has done to improve AF and “blackout” performance. The PL1 was serious lagging in the area when compared to the Panasonic GF1 (which I ultimately purchased).

    Can the PL2 compete with the GF1? Also, would love to see you post a follow up video showing the AF performance.

  9. Photo-John
    January 11, 2011

    Craig-
    “Also, would love to see you post a follow up video showing the AF performance.”

    I can do that :-)

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:

Leave a Reply