Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS – First Impressions

Camera Reviews Featured Olympus Point and Shoot Underwater Videos

 
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS – First ImpressionsNote: this article has been updated with a hands-on video intro for the TG-1 that includes some sample video clips and more action photo samples.

A few weeks ago Olympus announced their latest top-of-line rugged waterproof camera, the TG-1 iHS. They made a big move with this camera by giving it an f/2.0 zoom lens (4x 25-100mm f/2.0-4.9). No other waterproof point-and-shoot even comes close to that kind of lens spec. Most waterproof point-and-shoot cameras are in the neighborhood of f/4 to f/6. That large aperture lets in more light for better low light photos and it also means you can take pictures where the background is out of focus – that’s very important for portraits. The TG-1 also has a new 12-megapixel backlit CMOS sensor, which is supposed to deliver better image quality – especially at higher ISO settings. I’m a big fan of rugged, waterproof pocket cameras since I spend a lot of time playing in the mountains. The combination of the f/2.0 lens and new sensor made me very excited and I let Olympus know I wanted to get my hands on the TG-1 as soon as possible. Olympus rushed a camera to me and I took a bunch of pictures with it yesterday so I could get this first impressions article up right away.

Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS With f/2.0 Lens

The Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS has a ton of features, including built-in GPS, scene modes, “Magic” in-camera effect modes, full HD video, a beautiful OLED display and 5 frames per second high-speed burst. The “Tough” in the name is because it’s waterproof to 40 feet deep, shockproof from about 6 feet, crushproof and freezeproof. But this is a first impressions article. If you want to know all about the camera’s features and specs, please read my Olympus TG-1 iHS intro article. The main thing I want to address here is whether the new f/2.0 lens and backlit CMOS sensor make a real difference in image quality. The past couple generations of Olympus waterproof point-and-shoots disappointed me with their image quality and I’m impressed and excited about the aggressive feature spec on the TG-1. It’s about time a camera company stepped up and made a waterproof camera like this.

Here’s a hands-on video intro for the new Olympus TG-1 that I made after this first impressions article was published. I’ve had a chance to use the camera a bit more now and the video includes some sample video clips and more action photos.

Olympus Tough TG-1 Intro Video

YouTube Preview Image

Like I said, I shot a bunch of photos with it yesterday and there’s a photo gallery below you can browse to make your own judgment about the TG-1’s image quality. I shot in a wide variety of conditions and I think image quality really has improved compared to the last couple of years of Olympus waterproof cameras. The photos still don’t look nearly as good as my two favorite premium compact cameras, the Olympus XZ-1 and the Fujifilm X10; or even one of the current Canon ELPH digital pocket cameras. But waterproof digital cameras have never been as good as their non-waterproof siblings. The TG-1 photos are still soft and watercolory when viewed at 100% and you have to watch the exposure because it’s easy to blow the highlights. But my TG-1 photos are clearly better than the last couple of generations of Tough cameras. They look more natural with a subtle tonality that was lacking in previous Olympus waterproofs. The camera seems to be capturing details better and the in-camera noise reduction mushiness isn’t that noticeable unless you really zoom in. The low light image quality has been improved quite a bit as well – as much as two stops, I believe. The image below was deliberately shot at ISO 1600 for testing purposes and so I could freeze the action. It’s a bit soft, but still holds up well – especially considering it was taken with a waterproof point-and-shoot. I made an 8.5×11 inch print from that file and it looked pretty decent. I wouldn’t submit it to a magazine for publication, but it’s certainly Facebook, scrapbook or even 8×10 print-worthy. Especially for a camera that you can keep in your pocket and whip out in the rain, or take to the waterpark. If you can keep it below ISO 800, I think the TG-1 image quality is very good.

Dorothy - Olympus Tough TG-1 - ISO 1600

With as much processing as there is with the TG-1 photos, it’s hard to really say how good the lens is. But the bokeh (the out-of-focus quality) is definitely better than I’m used to seeing from a waterproof point-and-shoot. The shallower depth-of-field you get from the large aperture also helps your subject stand out from the background better. I’m used to waterproof cameras shooting at f/5.6 or smaller (a larger number means a smaller the aperture and more depth-of-field) and everything being sharp, making a lot of photos too busy. The large f/2.0-4.9 aperture minimizes that problem by generally softening the background. However, it’s still a point-and-shoot camera with a tiny sensor so don’t expect anything like digital SLR bokeh, depth-of-field or image quality. The TG-1 is a big improvement for a waterproof point-and-shoot but it’s not anywhere near competing with premium point-and-shoots that have bigger sensors, let alone Micro Four Thirds cameras or DSLRs.

Jenni - Olympus Tough TG-1 - ISO 800

One other feature I want to mention is the TG-1’s five frames per second burst mode. Previous Olympus Tough cameras were pretty pokey with no real burst mode. That was a bummer because these cameras are capturing for capturing outdoor adventures, and that demands a decent burst mode – at least five frames per second. I haven’t tried to shoot any action sequences with the burst mode yet but I did check to make sure that it’s not reduced resolution and it’s not. This will make a real difference when it comes to capturing the perfect high-speed action shot.

My first impressions of the Olympus Tough TG-1 are pretty good. I won’t lie – I was hoping for better image quality. But the new lens, the improved image quality and the faster burst rate add up to a significant improvement over past Olympus Tough cameras. The image quality isn’t awesome – you still have to give up “Tough” and waterproof to get really great image quality from a point-and-shoot. But I will happily continue packing the TG-1 on the mountain bike and in my pocket to see what I can get out of it. I’ll do my best to avoid going over ISO 800, though. Luckily, that shouldn’t be too hard with the f/2.0 lens. Next up – controlled studio test photos, getting the camera out in the rain, shooting some action sequences, some videos and maybe even getting it in the hot tub for some critical bikini testing.


Related Content:
All Olympus Digital Camera Reviews
Olympus Digital Cameras Forum
General Digital Cameras Forum
All Olympus News
Olympus Web Site


(Visited 18,926 times, 2 visits today)
About the author: Photo-John

Photo-John, a.k.a. John Shafer, is the managing editor of PhotographyREVIEW.com and has been since the site launched back in 1999. He's an avid outdoor enthusiast and spends as much time as possible on his mountain bike, hiking or skiing in the mountains. He's been taking pictures for ever and ever, and never goes anywhere without a camera.

View all articles by Photo-John

Related Articles

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • Knight Palm says:

    Good job with your review, much appreciated. I do miss the EXIF data in the test images however they are annotated in your text.

    Are there any recommended lens apertures? Best at f/2.0 or does it improve at f/2.8 and f/4.0? Do you see general softness due to diffraction already at f/4.0?

    How does the image stabilization work? IBIS only for still photos, and EIS for video I suppose?

    How does the flash work with eg. group photos? With single portraits?

    How is the handling of the cameras controllers? Can it be done with ski gloves on?

    • Photo-John says:

      Sorry about the EXIF data. I’m not trying to hide anything but I always use the Photoshop “Save For Web” feature for better compression and it strips out the EXIF info. I will take a look at other options to see if I can leave the EXIF in.

      I haven’t used the camera enough to have a sense of what apertures are best. And in a way it doesn’t matter since you can’t manually choose the aperture. There’s also enough in-camera image processing that I don’t think the sharpness of the lens is really obvious. The bokeh is, though. All that aside, f/2.0 looks fine to me and with this kind of camera and sensor, I wouldn’t get too nitpicky

      Control seems fine. There is an option for “Tap Control,” which was specifically designed to use with gloves on. I used it on an older model and if memory serves correct it worked decently.

      Not sure about the IS details. I know it has mechanical image stabilization for stills but I’m not sure what it has for video. I noticed it has a special IS video mode that I believe is for use when you’re recording and moving – like walking or running.

      I will do some more flash testing so I have some better and more varied samples.

      Thanks for the great comment and suggestions!

  • Donna says:

    Would love to see some underwater shots before making up my mind. I would be planning on using it underwater in 20-30ft for 99% of the time (scuba diving).

    • Photo-John says:

      I will try to do some underwater tests soon. However, I’m not a diver so expect them to be pretty simple and shallow. If your main use is going to be diving then you may want to consider a point-and-shoot with an underwater housing. As good as the waterproof point-and-shoots are, they sometimes do fail. A camera with a waterproof housing will be more reliable and go deeper so I think that’s the better choice for serious underwater use.

  • Marten says:

    taking photos in low light, is the screen viewable so you can see what your taking. Just bought the mu 8010 and the screen is almost dark in low light making it almost impossible to see what you are taking, where as my old mju 1030sw will clearly show what you are looking at when comparing the same view. thanks in advance

  • Coralie says:

    We have a Nikon D80 which I love, for the most part. I have been looking at The Olympus Tough camera and the Nikon AW100. which one do you think would be better? I am concerned about th zoom with both cameras considering what I am used t with my other camera. Any help and advise would be greatly appreciated. Or young boys area very active so we need something that can keep up with them.
    Thanks

    • Photo-John says:

      Coralie-
      Since I wrote this first impressions article I’ve added a page of studio sample photos from the TG-1, which I compared closely to my Nikon AW100 studio samples. The TG-1 image quality is definitely better. The burst is also better. Right now, the Olympus TG-1 is my top recommendation for a rugged waterproof camera. I’m waiting to get the Canon PowerShot D20 and that could change things. The Nikon is very good. But in my opinion, the TG-1 is better.

      Here’s a link to the Olympus TG-1 and Nikon AW100 sample photo pages:

      Olympus Tough TG-1 Studio Sample Photos
      Nikon Coolpis AW100 Studio Sample Photos

      And here’s a link to my 2012 Outdoor and Waterproof Camera Guide. If you haven’t seen it already, it’s my comprehensive guide to waterproof P&S cameras, with my personal camera recommendations: http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/outdoor-waterproof-digital-cameras

  • GeoffM says:

    Great, unbiased review, and a great site (my 1st time here, but I’ll be back). I recently purchased the TG-1, and am a photographic hobbyist. My other cameras are the LX5 and the Nikon D40. I think your test pics, as well as mine are perfectly acceptable, compared to larger sensor P&Ss, and especially to other all-terrain P&Ss.

    Have you had the chance or planning to test the lens accessories that are or will soon be available? I’m really interested in the 1.7 telephoto converter.

    Have

  • GeoffM says:

    This is my first purchase of an UW all-terrain camera, and regarding potential leakage, I’m impressed with the double-locking mechanism of the battery and USB compartments, although I have yet to take it in the water (I’ve had this camera for just a few days).

  • Wes says:

    I am a kayaker, sea & whitewater; hence I am looking for a point and shoot for an alternative to my GoPro POV camera. In addition, I need a camera that will serve well as a family camera as well. In your opinion, would the Olympus TG1 be my best purchase or do you have anothe suggestion? Sound quality?

    Thanks for your guidance,
    Wes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*