WPtouch Pro Theme Preview

Reload

4 responses

  1. francois
    January 16, 2012

    Convergence is good! I like how they’re thinking and rethinking things.

  2. Photo-John
    January 16, 2012

    I agree. The next step for camera phones is a better lens. Or – we could maybe have a camera with a phone built in. Still, for me, the Eye-Fi card already gives me all that. The only cost is I have to carry a point-and-shoot camera as well as my phone and I have to take the extra step of transferring the photo from the camera to the phone. That’s a small price to pay for better photos, I think.

  3. PAul
    January 16, 2012

    Polaroid is a total surprise as I didn’t see them as a phone manufacturer (to get the 3G chipset and Android) and had pretty much written them off as a quality camera manufacturer.
    I can see where they’re coming from here, with their backgrond in instant photography, but they’re rather late to the game comparing with other cameras with WiFi functions already doing this (maybe at better quality).
    Bluetooth is rather power hungry and short range, WiFi the competitors already have, what surprises me is that 3G is an option, not standard. If they’re going to stand out from the competition it needs 3G, how many parties where you want to share images will have WiFi?

    I would far prefer this camera to have an 8MP sensor, not cramming more pixels into a small sensor. After all it leads Apple by having optical zoom, all it needs is RAW and Adobe colour space to be more than a toy camera :)
    Having said that, when I had my car accident the registrar in A&E took a photo with his iPhone for the consultant (in the operating theatre two floors away) to check and advise on treatment, likely surgery time and so on. So lower resolution is adequate until someone changes the game by producing higher resolution.

    What makes this different is the programmability, if only there is good support for an API for the camera, that is going to be the key thing in producing apps that make this a killer piece of technology. Without support for the developers to produce the software and services to make this useful, it will flop painfully.
    I’m intrigued at the possibility of a programmable camera, for applications like cataloging work in progress.

    But there is no mention here of phone capability, just smart camera.
    I thought that a version of the tilt screen Samsung would be the first phone/camera crossover with even halfway decent lens and sensor and yet still retaining phone functions.
    Any bets on who will make a decent camera/phone?

  4. Photo-John
    January 16, 2012

    “But there is no mention here of phone capability, just smart camera.”

    Yeah, Paul. As best as I can tell, the Polaroid SC1630 has no phone capability. I sent two e-mails and made two phone calls to their PR people to try to get some questions answered and got no response so I had to go ahead and publish without knowing about phone capabilities. It’s possible that they fudged in their press release because they don’t have any carrier deals yet, It seems to me that if it’s running the Android OS then it can also work as a phone. But maybe I don’t really understand mobile phone tech well. Right now, all I know is that I don’t know :-)

    As far as what this specific device is or isn’t, can or can’t do – to some extent, that’s beside the point. Polaroid is moving things in the right direction with this device. Personally, I don’t think I’d buy a digital camera or a mobile device from Polaroid. But kudos to them for taking the logical next step.

NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:

Leave a Reply